Main Article Content

Abstract

In trying to get his land the farmer must consider the technical problem, economical and social the culture, the exploitation of agriculture always was linked with what will be produced, how many, here, when, how and where is distributed him. The utilization of the farmer's land as the production factor that was most important in the farming really was influenced by the relations kind between humankind and his land because will be related to in continuation of his farming. The land that was made an effort to get could take the form of his property personally or property of the other person. This research was aimed at identifying and analyzing the exploitation and institutional the agricultural land in rural areas. The method used was survey that was carried out in 12 Patanas villages that were spread in Lampung, West Java, Central Java, East Java, South Sulawesi, and NTB. In three villages, 25 farm households were selected. Results of the research showed the growth index reached 200 to 300, except in the paddy-field land where its irrigation was rotated and in dryland that was cultivated with cassava. The farmer used the superior variety seed, but did not yet apply balanced fertilizing. Fertilizing exceeded the recomendation whereas for other fertilizer (P05 and K20) and relative manure utilization was still under recommendation, in fact some farmers did not use. The productivity of the crop in the rainy season (rice and corn) higher was compared to dry season, except for the potato. Generally the farmer used capital personally, “YARNEN” system was an alternative that often was followed. The price of agricultural product was fluctuating in which the price of the dry season tended to be higher than in the rainy season, the status of the farmer was dominated by owner followed by the sharecropper and the leaser. The sharecropper and the leaser always did not come from the group landless because of the owner, also entered the rented market and sharecropper. The rented system that more stressed the aspect of economics than social more prominent in production centers of the potato.

Keywords

farming institutional the land agroecosystem

Article Details

How to Cite
Supadi, S. (2008). PENGUSAHAAN DAN KELEMBAGAAN LAHAN PERTANIAN DI BERBAGAI AGROEKOSISTEM (KASUS DESA-DESA PATANAS). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 7(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.7.2.19-40

References

  1. [BPS]. 2005. Statistik Indonesia 2004. Jakarta.
  2. Gunawan, M dan E. Pasandaran. 1989. Alokasi Masukan dalam Sistem Sakap. Dalam: Prosiding Patanas Evaluasi Kelembagaan Pedesaan di Tengah Perkembangan Teknologi. Puslit Agro Ekonomi. Hal 19-31.
  3. Harianto dan Katharina. 2005. Pertanian dan Lingkungan. Pelayaran dan Usahatani Lahan Kering Dataran Tinggi. Dalam Krisnamurthi (Ed). Menumbuhkan Ide dan Pemikiran Pembangunan Sistem dan Usaha Agribisnis. 60 Tahun Bungaran Saragih. Pusat Studi Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan. LPPM IPB. Hal 252-264.
  4. Hermanto. 1984. Pola Pemilikan dan Pengusahaan Lahan di Jawa Timur. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi (FAE), Vol. 3 No. 2 Desember 1984. Puslit Agro Ekonomi. Bogor. Hal. 9 -18.
  5. Husodo SY. 2003. Membangun Kemandirian di Bidang Pangan. Suatu Kebutuhan Bagi Indonesia. Artikel Tahun II No. 6 HKTI Jakarta 15 hal.
  6. Ilahauw J, Suwondo dan Widjajanto. 1985. Penguasaan Tanah Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Keketatan Budidaya dalam Mubyarto (Ed). Peluang Kerja dan Berusaha di Pedesaan. BPFE. Yogyakarta. Hal 209-295.
  7. Mosher AT. 1973. Menggerakkan dan Membangun Pertanian. Syarat-syarat Pokok Pembangunan Pertanian. Cetakan ke 4. CV. Yasaguna. Jakarta.
  8. Mubyarto. 1983. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. LP3ES Jakarta.
  9. Nurmanaf AR, Djulin A, Surpriadi, Sugiarto, Supadi, Agustin, Sinuraya dan Budhi. 2004. Analisis Struktur Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Pedesaan. Laporan Penelitian Puslitbang Sosek
  10. Pertanian Bogor.
  11. Saleh C dan Zakaria AK. 1996. Dinamika Distribusi Penguasaan Lahan Pertanian di Pedesaan Sulawesi Selatan. Puslit Sosek Pertanian Bogor.
  12. Sudaryanto T, Rusastra dan Jamal E. 2000. Kebijaksanaan Strategis Pembangunan Pertanian di Pedesaan dalam Mendukung Otonomi Daerah. Prosiding Perspektif Pembangunan Pertanian Pedesaan dalam Era Otonomi Daerah. Puslit Sosek Pertanian, Hal 1-12.
  13. Sugiarto. 1996. Distribusi dan Kelembagaan Penguasaan Lahan di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Puslit Sosek Pertanian.
  14. Sumaryanto dan SM. Pasaribu. 1996. Struktur Penguasaan Tanah di Pedesaan Lampung. Puslit Sosek Pertanian Bogor.
  15. Susilowati SH. 1996. Struktur dan Distribusi Lahan Pertanian (Studi Pedesaan Jawa Tengah). Puslit Sosek Pertanian Bogor.
  16. Susilowati SH, Sugiarto, Zakaria AK, Sudana W, Supriadi H, Supadi, Iqbal M, Suryani E, Syukur M, dan Soentoro. 2000. Studi Dinamika Ekonomi Pedesaan (Patanas). Puslit Sosek
  17. Pertanian Bogor.
  18. Zaini Z, Las I, Suwarno, Haryanto B, Soentoro dan Ananto E.E. 2002. Pedoman Umum Kegiatan Percontohan Peningkatan Produktivitas Padi Terpadu. Badan Litbang Pertanian.