Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 19, 2021
Accepted
December 22, 2021
Published
December 30, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 112 Download : 106

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cassava is the third food crops in Indonesia after rice and maize.  Ciseeng Subdistrict selected as the study site because it is one of the centers of cassava production in Bogor Regency.  The method used is mixed methods and its implementation using survey techniques.  Respondents determined intentionally (purposive) with a total of 30 farmers.  Declining interest of farmers is a problem in the cassava farming activities in Ciseeng Subdistrict.  The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics and efficiency of cassava farming income in Ciseeng Subdistrict.  In this study the characteristics described in the descriptive and efficiency of farming income using analysis of R/C ratio.  The results of the analysis showed that the income from cash costs and total costs on cassava farming in Ciseeng Subdistrict has a value greater than zero.  Revenue from cash costs is IDR 17.162.017,14 per hectare and for total costs is IDR 7.901.952,86 per hectare.  The results of the R/C ratio analysis also showed that cassava farming in Ciseeng Subdistrict was worth more than one. The R/C ratio of cash costs is 2,45 and the total costs are 1,38. So it can be said that cassava farming in Ciseeng Subdistrict is efficient or feasible to be developed.

Article Details

License

An author who publishes in the Journal of Agri Socio Economics and Business agrees to the following terms:

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Hasil gambar untuk gambar cc by sa

Journal Agri Socio-Economics and Business is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahmadona, L., & Agustin, R. E. (2021). Income Efficiency Of Cassava Farming In Ciseeng Sub-District Bogor Regency. Journal of Agri Socio Economics and Business, 3(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.31186/jaseb.3.2.81-90
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adeyemo, R., Oke J.T.O., dan Akinola A.A. 2010. Economic Efficiency of Small Scale Farmers in Ogun State, Nigeria. Tropicultural Journal, Vol. 28 (2): 84 – 88.
  2. Addinirwan, Luqman. 2014. Analisis Pendapatan dan Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Ubi Kayu di Desa Galuga Kecamatan Cibungbulang Kabupaten Bogor. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  3. Amanze, B., Eze C.C., dan Eze V. 2010. Factors Influencing the Use of Fertilizer in Arable Crop Production among Smallholder Farmers in Owerri Agricultural Zone of Imo State, Nigeria. Academia Arena Journal, Vol. 2 (6): 90 – 96.
  4. Awoniyi, O.A., Awoyinka Y.A., dan Kehinde, A.L. 2009. Effect of the Presidential Initiative on Cassava and Household Food Security Status in Iwo Zone of Osun State Agricultural Development Programme. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings. Hal: 755 – 760.
  5. Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
  6. Bamidele, F.S., Babatunde R.O., dan Rasheed A. 2008. Productivity Analysis of Cassava-based Production Systems in the Guinea Savannah: Case study of Kwara State, Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 3 (1): 33 – 39.
  7. Dinas Tanaman Pangan, Hortikultura, dan Perkebunan. 2018. Luas Lahan, Produktivitas, dan Produksi Ubi Kayu di Kabupaten Bogor. Distanhorbun Kabupaten Bogor. Bogor. https://distanhorbun.bogorkab.go.id [16 Oktober 2019].
  8. Kementerian Pertanian. 2016. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Sub Sektor Tanaman Pangan: Ubi Kayu. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. Jakarta.
  9. Kuye dan Olufemi Oludayo. 2015. Comparative Analysis of Constraints to Cassava Production by Cassava Farmer Loan Beneficiaries and Loan Non-Beneficiaries in South-South Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 3 (3): 38 – 52.
  10. Muizah, Rofiatul., Suprapti Supardi., dan Shofia Nur Awami. 2013. Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani Ubi Kayu (Manihot esculenta crantz) (Studi Kasus Desa Mojo Kecamatan Cluwak Kabupaten Pati). Jurnal MEDIAGRO, Vol. 9 (2): 55 – 67.
  11. Nandi, J. A., Gunn P., dan Yurkushi E.N. 2011. Economic Analysis of Cassava Production in Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 3 (3): 205 – 209.
  12. Nur Amri, Alfian. 2011. Analisis Efisiensi Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Ubi Kayu (Studi Kasus Desa Pasirlaja, Kecamatan Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor). Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  13. Rahmadona, Lola., Anna Fariyanti., dan Burhanuddin. 2015. Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani Bawang Merah di Kabupaten Majalengka. Jurnal AGRISE, Vol. 15 (2): 73 – 84.
  14. Sayogyo. 1977. Golongan Miskin dan Partisipasi dalam Pembangunan (Poor Household dan Thei Participation in Development). Prisma, Vol. 6 (3): 10 – 17.
  15. Soekartawi. 2016. Analisis Usahatani. UI Press. Jakarta
  16. Suratiyah, Ken. 2015. Ilmu Usahatani. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
  17. Tjiptoherijanto, Prijono. 2001. Proyeksi Penduduk, Angkatan Kerja, Tenaga Kerja, dan Peran Serikat Pekerja dalam Peningkatan Kesejahteraan. BAPPENAS. https://www.bappenas.go.id [16 Oktober 2019].
  18. Udoh, E. J., dan Falake O. 2006. Resource-use Efficiency and Productivity among Farmers in Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, Vol. 2 (4): 264 – 269.