Main Article Content

Abstract

[BIO-COMPOSTING OF SOLID OIL PALM WASTE WITH DIFFERENT DECOMPOSERS AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL CRITERIA FOR COMPOST QUALITY ASSESSMENT] The quantity of produced wastes by oil palm industry is increasing and may lead to significant environmental concerns and the use of these wastes as compost is considered to overcome their negative impacts. However, very few studies have been conducted to develop an effective composting process of the biomass waste using different decomposers. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the different physicochemical and biological quality of compost produced by bio-composting of solid oil palm waste with three different commercial decomposers. This study was conducted from September 2021 to November 2021 at the Compost House, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lambung Mangkurat. A certain period of bio-decomposition process was employed by using commercial bio-decomposers. Physicochemical and biological analyses of the composted solid waste were conducted after decomposer application. The experiment consisted of four treatments (i.e., solid oil palm waste + chicken manure, solid oil palm waste + chicken manure + EM4, solid oil palm waste + chicken manure + M21, and solid oil palm waste + chicken manure + Tangguh) and they were arranged in completely randomized design with three replicates. Results showed that quality of all compost met the SNI 400 standard except for pH, organic-C, and C/N ratio for the treatment without bio-decomposer,  pH and C/N ratio for the treatment EM4 bio-decomposer, water content, pH, organic-C, and C/N ratio for M21 bio-decomposer, and pH, organic-C, and C/N ratio for the treatment with Tangguh bio-decomposer, respectively. The maximum germination test obtained was recorded at 70%, 80%, 94%, and 86% in compost media without bio-decomposer, with EM4, 94% with M21, and with Tangguh, respectively. The maximum number of microbes were recorded at 3.2 x 106 µg/g, 2.9 x 105 µg/g, 1.3 x 106 µg/g, and 8.0 x 105 µg/g for compost without bio-decomposer, with EM4, with M21, and with Tangguh bio-decomposer, respectively.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Hafizah, N., Jumar, J., & Saputra, R. A. (2022). BIOPENGOMPOSAN LIMBAH KELAPA SAWIT PADAT DENGAN DEKOMPOSER YANG BERBEDA DAN KRITERIA FISIKOKIMIA UNTUK PENILAIAN KUALITAS KOMPOS . Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 24(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.31186/jipi.24.2.109-119

References

  1. Agroprobiotik. (2017). M21 Dekomposer Formula Membuat Pupuk Organik Alami. Retrieved July 3, 2021, from https://agroprobiotik.com/m21-decomposer-formula-membuat-pupuk-organik-alami/.
  2. Djuarnani, N., Kristian & Setiawan, B. S. (2015). Cara Cepat Membuat Kompos. Cetakan Pertama. AgroMedia Pustaka, Jakarta.
  3. Ekawandani, N. & Kusuma, A.A. (2018). Pengomposan sampah organik (Kubis dan Kulit Pisang) dengan menggunakan EM4. TEDC, 12(1), 38-43. DOI: https://10.31227/osf.io/3gt26.
  4. Eviati & Sulaeman. (2009). Analisis Kimia Tanah,Tanaman, Air dan Pupuk. Balai Penelitian Tanah, Bogor.
  5. Eulis T.M., (2009). Biokonversi Limbah Industri Peternakan. UNPAD Press., Bandung.
  6. Ginting, T., Zuhry, E. & Adiwirman, A. (2017). Pengaruh limbah solid dan NPK tablet terhadap pertumbuhan bibit kelapa sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) di pembibitan utama. Jurnal Online Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Riau, 4(2), 1-15.
  7. Graves, R.E. & Hattemer, G.M. (2000) Chapter 2 Composting. Part 637 Environmental Engineering National Engineering Handbook. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 210-VI-NEH.
  8. Hafifudin, T. (2015). Pengolahan Limbah. Diakses pada 20 Maret 2022. http://pengelolahanlimbah. wordpress.com/category/ekompos-daun/.
  9. Haitami, A. & Wahyudi. (2019). Pengaruh berbagai dosis kompos solid plus (KotakPlus) dalam memperbaiki sifat kimia tanah Ultisol. Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian, 16(1), 56-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/jip.v16i1.2351.
  10. Hajoeningtijas, O.W. (2012). Mikrobiologi Pertanian. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
  11. Haq, A.S., Nugroho,W.A., Lutfi, M.. (2014). Pengaruh perbedaan sudut rak segitiga (600, 900 dan 1200) pada pengomposan sludge biogas terhadap sifat fisik dan kimia kompos. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian Tropis dan Biosistem, 2(3), 225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkptb.
  12. Harada, Y., Haga, K., Osada,T. & Koshino, M. (1993). Quality of compost from animal waste. JAQR, 26(4), 238-246.
  13. Hidayanto, M. (2008). Limbah Kelapa Sawit Sebagai Sumber Pupuk Organik dan Pakan Ternak. Seminar Optimalisasi Hasil Samping Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit dan Industri Olahannya sebagai Pakan Ternak, Puslitbang Peternakan, Jakarta..
  14. Hidayati, Y.A., Harlia, E., Marlina, E.T. (2008). Upaya pengolahan feses domba dan limbah Usar (Vitiveria zizanioides) melalui berbagai metode pengomposan. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Universitas Padjadjaran, 8(1), 87-90.
  15. Imran & Mustaka, Z D.(2020). Identifikasi kandungan kapang dan bakteri pada limbah padatan (Decanter solid) pengolahan kelapa sawit untuk pemanfaatan sebagai pupuk organik. Jurnal Agrokompleks, 20(1), 16-21. DOI: 10.51978/japp.v20i1.196.
  16. Irawan, B. & Padmawati, M. (2014). Pengaruh Susunan Bahan Terhadap Waktu Pengomposan Sampah Pasar pada Komposter Beraerasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Sains dan Teknologi (SNAST). Akademi Kimia Industri St. Paulus Semarang, Semarang.
  17. Isroi. (2007). Pengomposan Limbah Padat Organik. Balai Penelitian Bioteknologi Perkebunan Indonesia, Bogor.
  18. Isroi. (2008). Kompos. Balai Penelitian Bioteknologi Perkebunan Indonesia, Bogor.
  19. Kamal, N. (2012). Karakteristik Dan Potensi Pemanfaatan Limbah Sawit. Skripsi, Teknik Kimia. ITENAS. Bandung.
  20. Pahan, I. (2008). Panduan Lengkap Kelapa Sawit: Manajemen Agribisnis dari Hulu hingga Hilir. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
  21. Pramudyanto, B. (2003). Pemeriksaan Industri dalam Pengendalian Pencemaran. Agung, Semarang.
  22. Saputra, R.A., Gazali, A., Heiriyani, T., Santoso, U., Wahdah, R., Nugraha, I., Mulyana, R. (2019). Kualitas Kompos Limbah Jerami Padi di Wilayah Tungkaran Desa Ulin Kecamatan Simpur dengan Penambahan Kotoran Ternak yang Berbeda. Prosiding Seminar Nasional TAJAK BANUA, 1(1), 1-8.
  23. Selian, A. R. K. (2008). Analisa Kadar Unsur Hara Kalium (K) dari Tanah Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Bengkalis Riau Secara Spektrofotometri Serapan Atom (SSA). Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
  24. Stofella, P.J & Khan, B.A. (2001). Compost Utilization in Holticultural Croping Systems. Lewis Publishers, USA.
  25. Sutanto, R. (2002). Penerapan Pertanian Organik. Pemasyarakatan dan Pengembangannya. Penerbit Kanisius, Jakarta.
  26. Tumimbang, M., Tamod, Z.E. & Kumolontang, W. (2016). Uji kualitatif kandungan hara kompos campuran beberapa kotoran ternak peliharaan. Eugenia, 22(3), 123-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35791/eug.22.3.2016.14106.
  27. Widarti, B.N., Wardhini, W.K. & Sarwono, K. (2015). Pengaruh rasio C/N bahan baku pada pembuatan kompos dari kubis dan kulit pisang. Jurnal Integrasi Proses, 5(2), 75-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/jip.v5i2.200.
  28. Wiparnaningrum, L.P.M. (2013). Uji Potensial Bakteri Selulotik dari Kumbang Tinja (Dung beetles) Sebagai Bio-Toilet. Skripsi. Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
  29. Yuwono, D. (2007). Kompos. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.