Main Article Content

Abstract

The background of this research is the contribution of tax revenue from the Small Micro and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) sector which is still less than the national tax revenue although the amount of tax revenue from the UMKM sector continues to grow. This condition occurs after the government issued special tax rates for MSMEs through Government Regulation Number 46 of 2013 and most recently amended through Government Regulation Number 23 of 2018. The sources of this research are the MSMEs taxpayers in Tegal City, Tegal Regency, and Brebes Regency which consist of industry players, store building owners, food stall owners, transportation service actors, workshop owners, gold shop owners, and fishing tool shop owners. This research was made using a qualitative research design with a qualitative descriptive approach. The conclusion obtained from this research is that MSMEs tax compliance is influenced by the determinants of the modernization of the taxation system (e-System), the financial condition of taxpayers, financial records, service from tax officers, the level of tax awareness, transparency of information on the use of tax results, the level of understanding of taxpayers. Taxes, tax systems, tax sanctions, and annual tax return forms. The theoretical benefit of this research is that it can be used as a reference in the development of further research, increasing knowledge about the theory related to tax compliance and the factors that affect the level of compliance of MSMEs in carrying out their tax obligations. The practical benefit of this research is that it can provide input for the Government to design regulations that can be understood by all levels of society and supported by simple and applicable instruments. As well as being able to contribute to MSMEs so that they can participate in national development through fulfilling honest and open tax obligations

Keywords

Tax Tax Compliance Micro Small Medium Enterprise Taxpayers Tax Office

Article Details

How to Cite
Supriyono, A., Utami, I., & Muktiyanto, A. (2021). EXPLORATION OF TAX COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION ON MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.1.33-52

References

  1. Ananda, P. R. D., Kumadji, S., & Husaini, A. (2015). Pengaruh Sosialisasi Perpajakan, Tarif Pajak, dan Pemahaman Perpajakan Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi pada UMKM yang Terdaftar sebagai Wajib Pajak di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Batu). Jurnal Perpajakan (JEJAK), 151(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132886.
  2. Diamastuti, E. (2018). Ke (Tidak) Patuhan Wajib Pajak: Potret Self Assessment System. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 20(3), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2016.v20.i3.52.
  3. Diatmika, I. P. G. (2013). Penerapan Akuntansi Pajak Atas PP No. 46 Tahun 2013 Tentang PPh Atas Penghasilan Dari Usaha Wajib Pajak Yang Memiliki Peredaran Bruto Tertentu. Jurnal Akuntansi Profesi, 3(46), 113–121.
  4. Directorate General of Taxation. (2017a). Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-01/PJ/2017 tentang Penyampaian Surat Pemberitahuan Elektronik.
  5. _______________________. (2017b). Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-05/PJ/2017 tentang Pembayaran Pajak Secara Elektronik.
  6. __________________________. (2018). Peraturan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-02/PJ/2018 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Dirjen Pajak Nomor Per-20/Pj/2013 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Dan Pemberian Nomor Pokok Wajib Pajak, Pelaporan Usaha Dan Pengukuhan Pengusaha Kena Pajak.
  7. __________________________. (2019). Peraturan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor PER-02/PJ/2019. In Pajak.go.id. https://pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2019-03/PER - 32.PJ_.2015.pdf
  8. Friskianti, Y., & Handayani, B. D. (2014). Pengaruh Self Assessment System, Keadilan, Teknologi Perpajakan, Dan Ketidakpercayaan Kepada Pihak Fiskus Terhadap Tindakan Tax Evasion. 3(4), 457–465.
  9. Government Regulations. (2013). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 tentang Pajak Penghasilan atas Penghasilan dari Usaha yang Diterima atau Diperoleh Wajib Pajak yang Memiliki Peredaran Bruto Tertentu. Jakarta
  10. Government Regulations. (2018). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2018 tentang Pajak Penghasilan atas Penghasilan dari Usaha yang Diterima atau Diperoleh Wajib Pajak yang Memiliki Peredaran Bruto Tertentu. Jakarta
  11. Hardiningsih, P., & Yulianawati, N. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kemauan Membayar Pajak. Dinamika Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 3(1), 126–142.
  12. Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., Rechberger, S., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Justice perceptions and cooperation of citizens with the tax-authorities: The group engagement model of cooperation. Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl.8.2.179_1
  13. Hidayat, W., & Nugroho, A. A. (2010). Studi Empiris Theory of Planned Behavior dan Pengaruh Kewajiban Moral pada Perilaku Ketidakpatuhan Pajak Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Jurnal Akuntanso Dan Keuangan, 12(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-200205000-00005
  14. Imaniati, Z. Z. (2016). Pengaruh Persepsi Wajib Pajak Tentang Penerapan Kecil , Dan Menengah Di Kota Yogyakarta. E Biling Jurnal Nominal, V(46), 1–13.
  15. Jayanto, P. Y. (2010). Faktor-Faktor Ketidakpatuhan Wajib Pajak. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 2(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v2i1.2487
  16. Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.01.002
  17. Muliari, N. K., & Setiawan, P. E. (2011). Pengaruh persepsi tentang sanksi perpajakan dan kesadaran wajib pajak pada kepatuhan pelaporan wajib pajak orang pribadi di kantor pelayanan pajak pratama denpasar timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 6(1), 1–23.
  18. Nugraheni, A. D., & Purwanto, A. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi (Studi Empiris Pada Wajib Pajak di Kota Magelang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting2, 4(3), 568–581. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/17031
  19. Nurfadilah, P. S. (2018). UMKM Mampu Dongkrak Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Https://Ekonomi.Kompas.Com. https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2018/07/10/200246326/umkm-mampu-dongkrak-pertumbuhan-ekonomi.
  20. Organization For Economic Co-Operation And Development (OECD). (2004). Compliance Risk Management: Managing and Improving Tax Compliance. Centre for Tax Policy and Administration (CTPA), October, Hal: 1-73. https://www.oecd.org/tax/administration/33818656.pdf
  21. Ritonga, A. A. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak & Perpajakan Indonesia. Pustaka El Manar.
  22. Sa’diya, Maulida Alfi Lofiana. Handayani, Siti Ragil. Effendy, I. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 untuk Wajib Pajak yang Memiliki Peredaran Bruto Tertentu (Studi Pada KPP Pratama Malang Utara). Jurnal Perpajakan (JEJAK), 10(1), 1–7.
  23. Supriyati. (2017). Tax Compliance Dan Tax Evasion: Tantangan Demokratisasi Wajib Pajak. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i2.9218
  24. Tjiali, W. (2015). Analisis Penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 Terhadap Terhadap Pertumbuhan Jumlah Wajib Pajak Dan Penerimaan Pph Pasal Analysis of Application Government Regulationnumber46Year2013 At Growth of. Jurnal EMBA, 3(4), 369–376.
  25. Trihatmoko, H., & Mubaraq, M. R. (2020). Pengaruh Pemahaman Akuntansi dan Pemahaman Perpajakan terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak pada KPP Pratama MAdiun. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(9), 2231–2243. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i09.p05