Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to examine influenceof control authorities and business strategy towards information
management accounting systems (SI AM) on the company pharmacy in Palembang. The population used in the study
in the i that is p erusahaan f armasi in Palembang. Samples in research use respon en Pharmaceutical company
Manager in Palembang that understands the systems account information tansi was man ajemen (SI AM). Data
research results processed by downloading will double the ber linear esi regr yan g showed positive and significant
effect of controling formal management accounting information system (SIAM). Control authority in formal
influential positif and significantly limited management accounting information system (SIAM). Influential business
strategy positively and significantly to management accounting information system (SIAM).


Keywords: Control Authority, Business Strategy, Management Accounting Information System.

Article Details

How to Cite
Marietza, F., & Siahaan, C. G. A. (2016). Pengaruh Kontrol Otoritas dan Strategi Bisnis Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen (SIAM) Pada Perusahaan Farmasi Di Palembang. Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.6.2.185-196

References

  1. Abernethy, M. A. & Guthrie, C. H. ( 1994). An Empirical Assessment of the “fits” Between Stra tegy and Management In formation S ystem Design. Accounting and Finance, Vol.34, pp .49
  2. Agbejule, A. ( 2005). The relationship between management accounting systems and perceived environmental uncertainty on managerial performance : a research note. Accounting and Business Research, 35( 4).
  3. Ahmasafari, Chitranigrum. 1995. Analisis Pengaruh Interaksi Antara Sistem Akun tansi.
  4. Bordnar, George H (1995), Accounting information System, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
  5. Chia, Y.M. (September 1995) , Decentralization, Managament Accounting S ystem Information Characteristic And Their Interaction Effects on Managerial Performance : A Singapore Study, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, pp. 811- 830.
  6. Cyer t. R. M., & March. J. G. (1963) . A beha vioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliff s. NY: Prentice Hall.
  7. Govjndarajan . V. ( 1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business unit level: integrating admin istrative mechanism with strategy. Academy of management Journal, 31(4), 828-853.
  8. Gross, Edward dan Amitai Etzioni, 1985, Organization in Society, Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Pr etice-Hall.
  9. Gul, F.A., dan Yew Ming Chia (1994), The Effect Of Management Accoun ting Systems, Perceived Environment Uncertainty And Decentralization On Managerial Performance: A Test Of Three Way Intera ction, Accounting, Organization.
  10. Laksmana, A., & Muslichah. 2002. Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi, Saling Ketergantungan, Karakteristik Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Kin erja Manajerial. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan, 4 ( 2), 106- 125.
  11. Luft, J., & Shields, M. (2003). Mapping management accounting: making structural models from theory – based empirical research. Accounting Organ izations and Society, 28, 169 –250.
  12. Miles, Raymond E., and Charles C.Snow. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGr aw-Hill, 1978.
  13. Mowen, Maryanne M & Hansen, Don . R ( 2009). Akuntansi manajerial, Jakarta, SalembaEmpat.
  14. Nazaruddin, Ietje (1998), Pengaruh Desentra¬lisasi dan Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Mana jerial, Jurnal Riset Akun tansi Indonesia, Vol.1, No. 2, Juli, pp 141- 162
  15. Ramlia I shak, Iskandar Denny. 2014. Control authority, business strategy, and the characteristics of management accounting information systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Scien ces 164.
  16. Tjahjono, H. K., & Stevany, H. A. (2008). Pengaruh partsisipasi dan ketidakpastian Tugas Dalam Pengembangan sistem Informasi Manajemen Pada Kinerja Sistem Informasi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta , 1- 18.
  17. Young, D. W., & Saltman, B. (1985) . The Hospital Power Equilibrium, Physician Behavior and Cost Control. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
  18. Yuristisia, C. ( 2011). Pengaruh Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Variabel Moderasi Strategi Bisnis, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty (PEU), Dan Desentralisasi (Case Study:Perusahaan Manu faktur Di Pro v. JAMBI ).
  19. Zimmerman, J. (1997) . Accounting for Decision Making and Control. Boston : Irwin/McGr aw Hill