Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 17, 2019
Accepted
June 17, 2019
Published
June 17, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 230 Download : 1199

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to identify the academic fraud that occur in the environment college. Academic fraud was identified in this study is a fraud committed by students, faculty and employees. The population in this study were students of the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Bengkulu class of 2011 - 2012. Based on the method Slovin, gained 88 people who serve as research samples. This study uses two methods of data collection, the questionnaire method and interview method. This study found that the highest fraud that has occurred is cheating "cheating" by the students with the category of "moderate", while others identified fraud in the category of "low" and "very low".


Keywords: academic cheating

Article Details

License

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Halimatusyadiah, H., & Nugraha, A. (2019). IDENTIFIKASI TINGKAT KECURANGAN AKADEMIK DI LINGKUNGAN PERGURUAN TINGGI (Studi Pada Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Bengkulu). Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.7.2.35-52
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Colby, B. 2006. Cheating; What is it (online), (http://clas.asu.edu /files/AI%20Flier.pdf, diakses tanggal 14 mei 2015).
  2. Herman. 2008. “Pengaruh Keadilan Organisasi dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kecurangan” .Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang.
  3. Jogiyanto, H.M. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Bisinis. Yogyakarta : BPFE
  4. Karni. 2000. Klasifikasi Fraud. (http://berkatzega.blogspot.com/2014/11/tugas-softskill-2-kecurangan -fraud.html, diakses tanggal 10 april)
  5. Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L.,&Barton, S.M. 2003. Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done it, who does it, and why did theydo it. Electronic Jounal of Sosiology (online) ( http://www.sociology.org /content/vol7.4/lambert etal.html, diakses tanggal 14 mei 2015)
  6. Faisol, Moh. 2013. Akuntansi Forensik dan Fraud Examination, apa dan bagaimana?.Artikel (http://semangadmu.nlogspot.com/2013/10/akuntansi-forensik-dan -fraud.html?m=1, diakses tanggal 27 mei 2015).
  7. Muslimah. 2013. “Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Terhadap Praktik-praktik Kecurangan Akademik ( Akademik Fraud)”. Skripsi. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universsitas Brawijaya, Malang.
  8. Purnamasari. 2013. “Analisis Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akadamik Mahasiswa Pada Saat Ujian dan Metode Pencegahannya”. Skripsi. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
  9. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. Nomor 37 Tahun 2009. Dosen.Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Budaya ( KEMENDIKBUD) Republik Indonesia.
  10. Peraturan Pemerintah Reoublik Indonesia Nomor 53 Tahun 2010. Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Budaya (KEMENDIKBUD) Republik Indonesia.
  11. Rahmalia,Gugus. 2014. “Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Dimensi Fraud Diamond”. Skripsi Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisinis Universits Brawijaya, Malang.
  12. Riski.2004. Pendorong Terjadinya Fraud .(online). (http://download.portalgaruda .org.pdf, diakses 16 juni 2015).
  13. Sanusi. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  14. Sayyid. 2012. Fraud dan Akuntansi Forensik. Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN, Banjarmasin.
  15. Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Tuanakotta. 2010. Akuntansi Forensic dan Audit Investigative. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  17. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 14 Tahun 2005. Kewajiban dan Larangan Dosen. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Budaya Republik Indonesia.
  18. Bintaro, Wahyu., Purwanto, Edy., Noviyani, Indah, Dyah. 2013. Hubungan Self Regulated Dengan Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa. Educational Psycology Journal 2(1) 2013: Jurusan Psikologi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Padang.