Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 23, 2019
Accepted
June 25, 2019
Published
June 26, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1507 Download : 1242

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to make case analyze the impact of business ethics, level of audit materiality and audit risk towards auditor opinion. For public accountant engaged in assurance services. The result expected to contribute to the audit process of the client's financial statements in order to improve the performance of public accountants and achieve the goals of public accountants.

              The respondents that used in this research are the public accountant who works in public accountant firms. Data was collected using a questionnaire. Method verification analysis was used to test hypothesis and structural modeling with Partial Least Square application that is SmartPLS 3rd version.

              Result of this research reveals that of the three variables; business ethics, audit materiality, and audit risk, only audit risk that does not have a significant effect on auditor opinion. Audit risk does not have a significant effect on auditor opinion because the public accountant feels a lot and complexity of the data that the auditor must examine and the component influences audit risk.

 

Keywords: ethics, materiality, risk, auditor opinion.

 

Article Details

License

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Laila, C. H., & Novita, N. (2019). PENGARUH KODE ETIK, MATERIALITAS AUDIT DAN RISIKO AUDIT TERHADAP OPINI AUDITOR. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.1.63-82
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arifiyanto, Y. 2009. “Pengaruh Risiko Audit Dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Opini Audit”. Skripsi Jakarta.
  2. Bharata, dan Wiratmaja. 2017. “Pertimbangan Materialitas Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi Pengaruh Etika Profesi Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor”, E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Vol.20.2, Bali.
  3. Emrinaldi, dan Wahyudi. 2014. “ Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Auditor dan Situasi Audit terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Audit Melalui Pertimbangan Materialitas dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor”. Jurnal ilmiah STIE MDP, Vol.3 No.2, Maret.
  4. Endri, dan Harto. 2017. “Pengaruh Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintahan Daerah”, Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting: Volume 6, Nomor 1. Semarang.
  5. Feriyanto, Susilawati dan Dadang. 2017.“Pengaruh Profesionalisme Auditor Dan Pertimbangan Tingkat Materialitas Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberia Opini”, STAR – Study & Accounting Research | Vol XIV No.1, Bandung.
  6. Firdayanti, dan Suwandi. 2016 “ Pengaruh Pengalaman, Risiko Audit, Dan Tekanan Terhadap Ketetapan Pemberian Opini Audit dengan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderating Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik”, Akuntansi Peradaban : Vol.1 No.1 Januari 2016. Makassar.
  7. Ghozali, I. 2015. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  8. Hayes, Gorternaker, dan Wallage. 2017. Prinsip-prinsip pengauditan: International Standards on Audit. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  9. Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia (IAI). 2016. PSA No. 700 Perumusan Suatu Opini dan Pelaporan atas Laporan Keuangan, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  10. McDaniel, Carl dan Gates. 2013. Riset Pemasaran Kontemporer ( Sumiyarto dan Rambat Lupiyoadi, Penerjemah). Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  11. Rukimin, R. 2008. “ Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Electronic Data Processing Audit dan Resiko Audit terhadap Kinerja Audit”. Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.
  12. Soedarso, P. 2018. “ Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Materialitas, Dan Risiko Audit Terhadap Pengendalian Intern Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Opini Audit”, Akademika Vol. 16. No.1, Jakarta.
  13. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik – SA Seksi 320. 2016. “Pengidentifikasian Dan Penilaian Risiko Kesalahan Penyajian Material Melalui Pemahaman Atas Entitas Dan Lingkungannya”. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  14. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Tuanakotta, T. M. 2013. Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
  16. Virgasari, A. 2009. Hubungan Antara Opini Auditor pada Laporan Keuangan Daerah, Pendapatan Asli Daerah(PAD) dan Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU) dengan Kinerja Keuangan Daerah. Skripsi. Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
  17. Wahyudi, Nur, dan Saidi. 2017. “Hubungan Etika Profesi, Keahlian, Pengalaman, Dan Situasi Audit Dengan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Dalam Audit Laporan Keuangan Melalui Pertimbangan Materialitas Dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor”.
  18. Winadi, dan Mertha. “Pengaruh Independensi, Skeptisisme Dan Gender Pada Pertimbangan Materialitas Dan Implikasinya Pada Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor”, E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Vol.19.1, Bali, Agustus 2017.