Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan yang mempengaruhi utang perusahaan. Variabel yang digunakan adalah dewan komisaris, komisaris indepen, kepemilikan institusi, ukuran perusahaan, usia perusahaan, dan profitabilitass. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan model analisis linier berganda. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel berupa badan usaha industri manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jumlah sampel yang digunakan adalah 260 observasi. Hasil temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa  dewan komisaris, dan ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap leverage sementara komisaris indepen, kepemilikan institusi, usia perusahaan dan profitabilitass berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap leverage pada perusahaan industri manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI

Keywords

Tata Kelola Perusahaan Utang Perusahaan Teori Keagenan

Article Details

How to Cite
Piettojo, J. J., Murhadi, W. R., & Wijaya, L. I. (2022). Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Utang Perusahaan. The Manager Review, 4(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.33369/tmr.v4i1.21145

References

  1. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
  2. Abor, J. and Biekpe, N. (2005), “Does corporate governance affect the capital structure decision of Ghanaian SMEs?”, working paper, University of Stellenbosch Business School, Bellville, Cape Town.
  3. Berger,A.N., Bonaccorsi di Patti, E., 2006.Capital structure and ?rm performance: a new approach to testing a agency theory and application to the banking industry. J. Bank. Finance 30, 1065 – 1102
  4. Berger, P.G., Ofek, E.L.I., Yermack, D.L., 1997. Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. J. Finance 52, 1411–1438.
  5. Chancharat, N., Krishnamurti, C., Tian, G., 2012. Board structure and survival of new economy IPO ?rms. Corp. Gov.: Int. Rev. 20, 144–163.
  6. Chang, Y.-K., Chou, R.K., Huang, T.-H., 2014. Corporate governance and the dynamics of capital structure: new evidence. J. Bank. Finance 48, 374–385.
  7. Chen, Z., Cheung, Y.-L., Stouraitis, A., Wong, A.W.S., 2005. Ownership concentration, ?rm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pac.-Basin Finance J. 13, 431–449.
  8. Chen, P.F., He, S., Ma, Z., Stice, D., 2016. The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. J. Account. Econ. 61, 121–144.
  9. Detthamrong, U., 2014, Corporate governance, capital structure, and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand, Research in International Business and Finance, 2017, vol. 42, issue C, 689-709
  10. Dimitropoulos, P., 2012, Capital structure and corporate governance of soccer club, Management Research Review, Vol. 37 Iss 7 pp 658-678
  11. Garcia-del-Barrio, P. and Szymanski, S. (2009), “Goal ! Profit maximization versus win maximization in soccer”, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 45-68.
  12. García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I.-M., Martínez-Ferrero, J., 2015. Board diversity and its e?ects on bank performance: an international analysis. J. Bank. Finance 53, 202–214.
  13. Godfred A. Bokpin, Anastacia C. Arko, (2009) "Ownership structure, corporate governance and capital structure decisions of firms: Empirical evidence from Ghana", Studies in Economics and Finance, Vol. 26 Issue: 4, pp.246-256
  14. Graham, J.R. and Harvey, C. (2001), “The theory and practice of corporate ?nance: evidence from the ?eld”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 60, pp. 187-243.
  15. Herlambang, A., Murhadi, W. R., & Susanto, G. A. (2018). The effect of corporate governance on the capital structure: an Indonesian case. In 15th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2018). Atlantis Press.
  16. Hussainey, K. (2009), “The impact of audit quality on earnings predictability”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 340-51.
  17. Jensen M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976), Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), pp. 305-360.
  18. Jensen, M.C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash ?ow, corporate ?nance, and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev. 76, 323–329.
  19. Khaled Hussainey, Khaled Aljifri, (2012),"Corporate governance mechanisms and capital structure in UAE", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 13 Iss: 2 pp. 145 – 160
  20. Kumalasari, G. V., Murhadi, W. R., & Wijaya, L. I. (2019, March). The effect of good corporate governance on capital structure in financial sector firms listed on the Indonesia stock exchange over the period of 2012-2016. In 16th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2019) (pp. 48-51). Atlantis Press.
  21. Kurniasari, I., Murhadi, W. R., & Utami, M. (2016). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Capital Structure In Indonesia Stock Exchange. Proceedings Insyma 13Th, 13, 290-298.
  22. Lakshmi, K. (2009), “Ownership structure and capital structure: evidence from Indian firms”, working paper, King Saud University, Riyad, available at: http://ssrn.com/ abstract¼1344113 (accessed 20 October 2009).
  23. Litov, L.P. (2005), “Corporate governance and ?nancing policy: new evidence manuscript”, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY.
  24. Margaritis, D., Psillaki, M., 2010. Capital structure, equity ownership and ?rm performance. J. Bank. Finance 34, 621–632.
  25. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958), “The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment”, American Economic Review, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 261-97.
  26. Myers, S. (2001), “Capital structure”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 81-1
  27. Titman, S. and Wessels, R. (1988), “The determinants of capital structure choice”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
  28. Wen, Y., Rwegasira, K., Bilderbeek, J., 2002. Corporate governance and capital structure decisions of the Chinese listed ?rms. Corp. Gov.: Int. Rev. 10, 75–83.
  29. Zhang, Q., Chen, L., Feng, T., 2014. Mediation or moderation? The role of R&D investment in the relationship between corporate governance and ?rm performance: empirical evidence from the Chinese IT industry. Corp. Gov.: Int. Rev. 22, 501–517.