Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 22, 2023
Published
July 31, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 277 Download : 245

Main Article Content

Abstract

The police online performance management system termed SMK is an electronic application to appraise work performances of the police officers in Indonesia. The system is to accommodate the reform policy made by the Indonesian National Police headquarter and have to implemented to all work units. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to describe the implementation of the police performance management system electronically consisted of the performance planning, performance monitoring, performance implementation, performance evaluation and submission of objections to the performance appraisal. The police officers who worked at the Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation in Bengkulu Regional Police headquarter were chosen as the subject for the study. A set of questionnaires was distributed to the subject as the respondents to collect information about their perceptions on the SMK implementation. Data gathered were analyzed using the descriptive statistics of mean, percentage, and frequency. The results indicate that systematically, the Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation followed the procedures of the performance appraisal very well on the five aspects assessed. However, practically, some procedures were missing. The aspect of performance planning was according to the procedure but from the indicators planned was written and formulated by the staff of each unit referred to the assessment indicators for the past period. The performance monitoring aspect was carried out from time to time, which was at the end of each semester. The implementing of the procedural assessment had been based on the assessment indicators in the form of generic factors and specific factors that have been agreed upon. The Evaluation of the performance appraisals, both the outstanding polices and the polices committing violations had been carried out in accordance with the rules. No one submitted the objections regarding the performance evaluation results. It needs a strong commitment to obey the rules. The implications and the suggestions are discussed.


 


Keywords:  Performance Management System, Performance Assessment, Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation, Regional Police

Keywords

Performance Management System, Performance Assessment, Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation, Regional Police Performance Management System Performance Assessment Directorate of Special Criminal Investigation Regional Police

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Khoiril Akbar, Ridwan Nurazi, Slamet Widodo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Akbar, K., Nurazi, R., & Widodo, S. (2023). Analysis Of The Online Performance Management System (Smk) Implementation In The Directorate Of Special Criminal Reserve Of The Bengkulu Regional Police. The Manager Review, 5(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.33369/tmr.v5i1.29732
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance management. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-hall
  2. Ahanger, T.A., Bhatia, M., & Aldaej, A. (2021). Game theory-based performance assessment of police personnel. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 2021, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-021-03310-W
  3. Alosani, M.S., Yusoff, R., & Al-Dhaafri, H. (2019). The effect of innovation and strategic planning on enhancing organizational performance of Dubai Police. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-06-2018-0039
  4. Amegayibor, G.K. (2021). The effect of demographic factors on employees’ performance: A case of an owner-manager manufacturing firm. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 1(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v1i2.853
  5. Amrullah, A., Suaib, E., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Penempatan sdm polri menuju personil yang profesional pada kepolisian daerah provinsi sulawesi tenggara. Jurnal Administrasi Pembangunan dan Kebijakan Publik, 12(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.33772/publica.v12i1.13298
  6. Anuraga, F.D. (2021). Optimalisasi aplikasi sistem manajemen kinerja (SMK) online dalam rangka mewujudkan sumber daya manusia (SDM) Polda Jatim yang presisi di era Police 4.0. Greenomika, 3(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.55732/UNU.GNK.2021.03.2.7
  7. Anwar, D. (2019). Kamus lengkap bahasa indonesia. Surabaya: Karya Abditama.
  8. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing performance: Performance management in action.
  9. Awing, R. (2015). Sistem informasi personil Polda Sulut Berbasis Web. Politeknik Negeri Manado.
  10. Bhujade, V.V, Lende, S.P., Tadas, T.N., & Hiwarkar, R.R. (2014). eCOPS electronics police record management system. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 2(3), 537–540. https://doi.org/10.17762/IJRITCC.V2I3.3005
  11. Boswell, W.R., & Boudreau, J.W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200023)11:3<283::AID-HRDQ6>3.0.CO;2-3
  12. Bungin, B. (2017). Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
  13. Cederblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications, and suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285572
  14. Comfort, P., Jones, P.A., & McMahon, J.J. (2018). Performance assessment in strength and conditioning. UK: Routledge.
  15. Dessler, G. (2017). Human resource management (15 ed.). UK: Pearson.
  16. Ding, J., Zheng, Q., Wang, X., Zhu, H., & Zhang, J. (2016). Assessment of innovative performance management in Chinese Police System. Public Personnel Management, 45(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026016630368
  17. Djamin, A. (2010). Manajemen pembinaan Polri pendukung keberhasilan manajemen operasional. Sanyata Sumanasa Wira, SespimPolri.
  18. Elaine, D.P. (2014). Performance management: A roadmap for developing implementing and evaluating performance management systems. Effective Practice Guidelines, 1–56.
  19. Farsole, S.R., Kene, S.B., & Bhujade, V.V. (2014). E-Police record management system. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 2(3), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.17762/IJRITCC.V2I3.2998
  20. Fitriawan, M.A.R., & Fitriati, R. (2019). Improving Polri performance management online practices in Polrestabes Surabaya East Java. Administrative Science, 5(1), 1–11.
  21. Frihamdeni, & Suwandi, I.M. (2022). Implementation of a performance evaluation policy for regional police Metro Jaya employees using an online performance management system. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 4(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.22487/jpag.v4i1.331
  22. Gilmore, S. & Williams, S. (2012). Human resource management. UK: Oxford University Press.
  23. Greguras, G.J., Robie, C., Schleicher, D.J., & Goff, M. (2003). A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00141.x
  24. Hardiyansyah. (2012). Sistem administrasi dan manajemen sumber daya manusia sektor publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
  25. Hartanto, D. (2020). Strategi Optimalisasi sistem pembinaan penyidik polri guna meningkatkan kinerja organisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, 12(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.24114/JUPIIS.V12I1.15823
  26. Hofkirchner, W., & Schafranek, M. (2011). General system theory. In Philosophy of Complex Systems (hal. 177–194). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52076-0.50006-7
  27. Homedes, N., & Ugalde, A. (2005). Las reformas de salud neoliberales en América Latina: una visión crítica a través de dos estudios de caso. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 17(3), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892005000300012
  28. Ismawati, E. (2017). Implementation of polri performance management system as performance equipment personnel Polda DIY Performance. Technology University Yogyakarta.
  29. Kompaso, S.M., & Sridevi, M.S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v5n12p89
  30. Kumar, T.K.V. (2021). The influence of demographic factors and work environment on job satisfaction among Police personnel: An empirical study. International Criminal Justice Review, 31(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567720944599
  31. Lum, C., Koper, C.S., & Willis, J. (2017). Understanding the limits of technology’s impact on police effectiveness. Police Quarterly, 20(2), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116667279
  32. Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2008). Human resource management at work : people management and development. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  33. Mathis, R.L., & Jackson, J.H. (2010). Human resource management. Cincinnati, USA: South-Western College Publishing.
  34. Mayastinasari, V., Earlyanti, N.I., & Syafruddin. (2019). Strategi pengelolaan kinerja untuk mewujudkan polri promoter. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(2), 9. http://www.jurnalptik.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/161
  35. Mayastinasari, V., & Suseno, B. (2020). Strenghtening performance of indonesian national police in south sumatera regional police. International Review of Humanities Studies, 5(2), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.7454/irhs.v0i0.261
  36. McIntyre, M.L., Caputo, T., Hodgkinson, T., Wang, L., & Davidson, R. (2021). Using organizational performance assessment to improve service to the community. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2020.1795859
  37. Mehmood, S. (2013). Managing performance through reward system. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 15(2), 64–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1526467
  38. Metcalfe, B., & Dick, G. (2001). Exploring organisation commitment in the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 24(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005854
  39. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis : A methods sourcebook. Logan, UT USA: Jenson Books Inc.
  40. Ndruru, R. K., & Utomo, D. P. (2020). Sistem Pendukung keputusan penilaian kinerja generik anggota Polri di Polda Sumatera Utara menggunakan metode MABAC & Entropy. KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30865/KOMIK.V4I1.2710
  41. Prasetyo, D. (2018). Rekonstruksi penilaian kinerja dalam perspektif sistem manajemen kinerja Polri. STIE Widya Wiwaha Yogyakarta.
  42. Regen, R., Johannes, J., Edward, E., & Yacob, S. (2020). Employee development model and an assessment on the perspectives of work behavior, motivation, and performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 9(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.20525/IJRBS.V9I2.625
  43. Roberts, A., Levy, P.E., Flores, C., & Thoebes, G. (2020). Performance management and workplace affect. In The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573887.026
  44. Scully-Russ, E. (2017). The handbook of human resource development, edited by N.E. Chalofsky, T.S. Rocco, & M.L. Morris. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 29(4), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20202
  45. Setyowadi, B. (2013). Sistem manajemen kinerja polri sebagai upaya peningkatan kinerja personel pada Polres Cilegon. Universitas Indonesia.
  46. Soupata, L. (2005). Engaging employees in company success: The UPS approach to a winning team. Human Resource Management, 44(1), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20046
  47. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  48. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2015). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
  49. Thomas, S.L., & Bretz, R.D. (1994). Research and practice in performance appraisal: Evaluating employee performance in America’s largest companies. SAM advanced Management Journal: 59(2).
  50. Watson, D., Amin, S. N., & Pino, N. (2022). Self-evaluating performance: An analysis of police integrity, professionalism and service provision from the South Pacific. Policing and Society, 32(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1888950
  51. Wibowo. (2017). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  52. Zhang, C.L.T., Yuan, C., Ren, Y., & Wang, S. (2020). The Influence of demographic characteristics on employee promotion: Research based on data mining and game theory. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2020, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8814733