Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 23, 2025
Published
December 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 18 Download : 11

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to explore the factors influencing individual decisions regarding the use of e-health applications in Indonesia, specifically in the DKI Jakarta Province, utilizing a modified version of the UTAUT2 model. Despite the conclusion of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine remains a focal point in healthcare delivery. A qualitative approach, supplemented by survey methods, was employed to collect data. The study utilized responses from users of various e- health applications, including Halodoc, Alodokter, Klikdokter, and Riliv, among others. Data were gathered from 420 respondents via an online survey administered through Google Forms. Structural Equation Modeling using Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM) analysis was conducted to test the proposed hypotheses.The findings revealed that factors such as performance expectations, user friendliness, facilitating conditions, habits, hedonic motivation, price-value perception, perceived product superiority, and perceived safety significantly influence users' behavioral intentions to engage with e-health applications. Conversely, social influence and hedonic motivation did not demonstrate a significant effect on users' behavioral intentions. These results provide valuable insights into the preferences and factors that shape the adoption of e-health applications within Indonesian society.

Keywords

e-health applications, Modified UTAUT2 model, price-value perception, perceived product superiority, perceived safety e-health applications Modified UTAUT2 model price-value perception perceived product superiority perceived safety

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ade Akbar Kurniawan, Effed Darta Hadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kurniawan, A. A., & Hadi, E. D. (2024). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Behavior of Using E-Health Applications with Modified Technology Utaut Model 2. The Manager Review, 6(2), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.33369/tmr.v6i2.41265
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdillah, W., & Jogianto. (2015). Partial Least Squares (PLS): An Alternative to Structural Equation Modeling in Business Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
  2. Al-Azzam, M. K., & Alazzam, M. B. (2019). Smart city and smart health framework: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100223
  3. Al-Azzam, M. K., Alazzam, M. B., & al-Manasra, M. K. (2019). mHealth for decision-making support: A case study of eHealth in the public sector. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(5), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100547
  4. Alfansi, L., & Atmaja, F. T. (2009). Service failure and complaint behavior in the public hospital industry: The Indonesian experience. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 21(3), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495140802644554
  5. Alfansi, L., & Daulay, M. Y. I. (2021). Factors affecting the use of e-money in the millennial generation: Research model UTAUT 2. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pemasaran Jasa, 14(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v14i1.8212
  6. Alpay, L. L., Henkemans, O. B., Otten, W., Rövekamp, T. A. J. M., & Dumay, A. C. M. (2010). E-health applications and services for patient empowerment: Directions for best practices in the Netherlands. Telemedicine and E- Health, 16(7), 787–791. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0156
  7. Ami-Narh, J. T., & Williams, P. A. H. (2012). A revised UTAUT model to investigate e-health acceptance among health professionals in Africa. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3(10), 1383–1391.
  8. Annur, C. M. (2022). Survey: Halodoc is the most frequently used health application among mothers in Indonesia. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/12/22/survei-halodoc-jadi-aplikasi-kesehatan- paling-sering-digunakan-ibu-di-indonesia (Accessed June 5, 2022, 21:25 WIB).
  9. Angelia, D. (2021). 10 most frequently used mental health service applications in Indonesian society in 2022. Retrieved from https://goodstats.id/article/10-aplikasi-layanan-kesehatan-mental-paling-sering-digunakan- masyarakat-indonesia-2022-6Fir1 (Accessed June 10, 2023).
  10. Baudier, P., Kondrateva, G., & Ammi, C. (2020). The future of telemedicine cabins? The case of French students’ acceptability. Futures, 122, 102595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102595
  11. Bol, N., Helberger, N., & Weert, J. C. M. (2018). Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities? Information Society, 34(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438550
  12. Boontarig, W., Chutimaskul, W., Chongsuphajaisiddhi, V., & Papasratorn, B. (2012). Factors influencing the intention of Thai elderly to use smartphones for e-health services. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, 479–483. https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268881
  13. Brauner, P., Van Heek, J., & Ziefle, M. (2017). Age, gender, and technology attitude as factors for acceptance of smart interactive textiles in home environments: Towards a smart textile technology acceptance model. ICT4AWE 2017 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006255600130024
  14. Chen, Q. L., & Zhou, Z. H. (2016). Unusual formations of superoxo heptaoxomolybdates from peroxo molybdates.
  15. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 67(3), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2016.03.015
  16. De Veer, A. J. E., Peeters, J. M., Brabers, A. E. M., Schellevis, F. G., Rademakers, J. J. D. J. M., & Francke, A. L. (2015). Determinants of the intention to use e-health by community-dwelling older people. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0765-8
  17. Duarte, P., & Pinho, J. C. (2019). A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption.
  18. Journal of Business Research, 102(February), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.022
  19. Edeh, E., Lo, W.-J., & Khojasteh, J. (2022). Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS- SEM) using R: A workbook. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2108813
  20. Enaizan, O., Eneizan, B., Almaaitah, M., Al-Radaideh, A. T., & Saleh, A. M. (2020). Effects of privacy and security on the acceptance and usage of electronic medical records: The mediating role of trust based on multiple perspectives. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 21, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100450
  21. Enaizan, O., Zaidan, A. A., Alwi, N. H. M., Zaidan, B. B., Alsalem, M. A., Albahri, O. S., & Albahri, A. S. (2020). Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health and Technology, 10(3), 795–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0278-7
  22. Expectancy, P. (2005). The UTAUT questionnaire items. In E-Health Systems Diffusion and Use: The Innovation, the User and the USE IT Model (pp. 93–97). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-423-1.ch005
  23. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2020). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using SmartPLS 3.0 for Empirical Research (2nd ed.). Semarang: Undip Publishing.
  24. Ghozali, I. (2021). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using SmartPLS 3.2.9 for Empirical Research (3rd ed.). Semarang: Undip Publishing.
  25. Ghozali, I., & Kusumadewi, K. A. (2023). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications Using SmartPLS 4.0 for Empirical Research (3rd ed.). Semarang: Undip Publishing.
  26. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., McKee, A., & Perdana. (2018). Blueprint for the Indonesian Payment System 2025. Bank Indonesia: Navigating the National Payment System in the Digital Era. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  27. Gu, D., Khan, S., Khan, I. U., Khan, S. U., Xie, Y., Li, X., & Zhang, G. (2021). Assessing the adoption of e-health technology in a developing country: An extension of the UTAUT model. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211027565
  28. Guo, X., Han, X., Zhang, X., Dang, Y., & Chen, C. (2015). Investigating m-health acceptance from a protection motivation theory perspective: Gender and age differences. Telemedicine and E-Health, 21(8), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.201
  29. Hair, J. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  30. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). The results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.