Main Article Content

Abstract

The relationship between schools and communities plays a strategic role in supporting educational quality and institutional sustainability. The principal holds a central managerial position in optimizing this relationship through leadership, communication, and participatory governance. This study aims to analyze the role of the principal in managing school-community relations at SMK Darur Roja Cinere Depok. A qualitative case study approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings reveal that the principal plays a crucial role as a communicator, mediator, and decision-maker in strengthening cooperation with parents and the surrounding community. However, several challenges were identified, including limited community participation, communication gaps, and the absence of structured management mechanisms. The study concludes that optimizing the principal’s role requires strategic leadership, transparent communication, and systematic engagement with stakeholders. These findings contribute to the development of effective school-community management practices in vocational education institutions.

Keywords

educational management, leadership, relations, stakeholder engagement kepemimpinan, hubungan, manajemen pendidikan, partisipasi masyarakat

Article Details

How to Cite
Suhaedi, U. (2025). Optimizing the Role of the School Principal in School–Community Relationship Management at SMK Darur Roja Cinere Depok: Optimizing the Role of the School Principal in School–Community Relationship Management at SMK Darur Roja Cinere Depok. The Manager Review, 7(3), 285–294. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/a46/article/view/47379

References

  1. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2019). Using collaborative inquiry to foster equity within school systems. British Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3502
  2. Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2021). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Urban Education, 56(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919872185
  3. Bush, T. (2018). Leadership and management development in education. Sage Publications.
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
  5. DeMatthews, D. E., Edwards, D. B., & Rincones, R. (2020). Social justice leadership and school–community partnerships. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19862946
  6. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493133
  7. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
  8. Hallinger, P. (2020). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
  9. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2021). Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership & Management, 41(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1880855
  10. Ishimaru, A. M. (2019). From family engagement to equitable collaboration. Educational Policy, 33(2), 350–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691841
  11. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
  12. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.
  13. Li, A., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. (2022). School leadership and stakeholder trust. School Leadership & Management, 42(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2035317
  14. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
  15. Rahman, A., Suyanto, T., & Wiyono, B. B. (2020). Principal leadership and school–community relations. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v27i2.25678
  16. Sanders, M. G. (2018). Principals’ leadership in school–family partnerships. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2017-0025
  17. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
  18. Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2019). Examining integrated leadership systems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18785848
  19. Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  20. Tran, L. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). School leadership in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1723451
  21. Wang, M. T., & Sheikh-Khalil, S. (2019). Does parental involvement matter? Child Development, 90(6), 1976–1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13154
  22. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.