Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 11 Download : 5

Main Article Content

Abstract

Kegiatan pendampingan guru SMP Negeri 6 Kota Bengkulu dalam mengembangkan instrumen tes literasi numerasi berbasis HOTS dengan bantuan aplikasi Kahoot bertujuan meningkatkan pemahaman guru dalam penyusunan instrumen tersebut. Kegiatan ini dilakukan melalui ceramah, demonstrasi, dan pendampingan. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa kegiatan berjalan baik, dengan capaian peserta 80%, tujuan workshop 75%, ketercapaian materi 80%, dan penguasaan materi oleh peserta sebesar 80%.

Keywords

HOTS, Kahoot Literasi Numerasi Pendampingan

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Yusnia Yusnia, Elwan Stiadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Abouhashem, A., Abdou, R. M., Bhadra, J., Santhosh, M., Ahmad, Z., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2021). A Distinctive method of online interactive learning in STEM education. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 13909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413909
  2. Acar. D, Tertemiz, N, Tasdemir, A. (2018). The efects of STEM training on the academic achievement of 4th graders in science and mathematics and their views on STEM training teachers . International Electronic Journal Of Elementary Education, 10(4), 505-513. https://bit.ly/3ALqVaz
  3. Adeyemi, O. B., & Adaramola, M. O. (2014). Mathematical literacy as foundation for technological development in Nigeria. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(5), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-04562831
  4. Agnihotri, D., Kulshreshtha, K., & Tripathi, V. (2021). A study on firms’ communication based on artificial intelligence and its influence on customers’ complaint behavior in Social media environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1116, Article 012180. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1116/1/012180
  5. Ahyan, S., Turmudi, T., & Juandi, D. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research on mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869, Article 012120. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1869/1/012120
  6. Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955-959.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
  8. Alper, B., Riche, N. H., Chevalier, F., Boy, J., & Sezgin, M. (2017). Visualization literacy at elementary school. Proceedings[A1] of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5485-5497). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025877
  9. Anggraeni, G. (2020). Level kemampuan literasi matematis pada buku tematik terpadu untuk siswa kelas 6 tema selamatkan makhluk hidup. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 4(3), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v4i3.14849
  10. Aritonang, I., & Safitri, I. (2021). Pengaruh blended learning terhadap peningkatan literasi matematika siswa [The effect of blended learning on increasing students' mathematical literacy]. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 735-743. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.555
  11. Astuti, N. H., Rusilowati, A., & Subali, B. (2021). STEM-based learning analysis to improve students’ problem-solving abilities in science subject: A literature review. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 10(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V9I2.38505
  12. Ayub, A. F. M., Yunus, A. S. M., Mahmud, R., Salim, N. R., & Sulaiman, T. (2017). Differences in students’ mathematics engagement between gender and between rural and urban schools. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1795(1), Article 020025. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972169
  13. Barry, D. M., Kanematsu, H., Nakahira, K., & Ogawa, N. (2018). A virtual workshop for creative teaching of STEM courses. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 927-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.027
  14. Basuki, I., & Hariyanto. (2014). Asesemen pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
  16. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. https://bit.ly/3Vu1nZ5
  17. Center for Educational Assessment of the Ministry of Education and Culture. (2022). Asesmen kompetensi minimum. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbudristek. https://bit.ly/3HwADl9
  18. Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4
  19. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset [Qualitative Research & Research Design]. Pustaka Pelajar.
  20. English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
  21. Estapa, A.T., & Tank, K.M.(2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, Article 6 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3
  22. Evagorou, M., & Nisiforou, E. F. I. (2020). Engaging pre-service teachers in an online STEM fair during COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 179-186. https://bit.ly/44kuQJ3
  23. Firdaus, A. R., Wardani, D. S., Altaftazani, D. H., Kelana, J. B., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2020). Mathematics learning in elementary school through engineering design process method with STEM approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657, Article 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012044
  24. Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531-548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
  25. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousandstudent survey of mechanics tests data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  26. Hapsari, I. P., Saputro, T. V. D., & Sadewo, Y. D. (2022). Mathematical literacy profile of elementary school students in Indonesia: a scoping review. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation, 2(2), 279-295.https://doi.org/10.46229/elia.v2i2.513
  27. He, X., Li, T., Turel, O., Kuang, Y., Zhao, H., & He, Q. (2021). The impact of STEM education on mathematical development in children aged 5-6 years. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, Article 101795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101795
  28. Himawan, N. A., Jumadi, & Purwanto, E. (2020). Identifikasi kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas xi di man 4 bantul pada suhu dan kalor [Identification of reasoning ability of class xi students in man 4 bantul on temperature and heat]. Edusains, 12(1), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.12784
  29. Indrasari, N., Parno, P., Hidayat, A., Purwaningsih, E., & Wahyuni, H. (2020). Designing and implementing STEM-based teaching materials of static fluid to increase scientific literacy skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(1), Article 050006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000532
  30. Jehlicka, V. & Rejsek, O. (2018). A multidisciplinary approach to teaching mathematics and information and communication technology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1705-1718. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85109
  31. Jošic, S., Pavešic, B. J., Gutvajn, N., & Rožman, M. (2022). Scaffolding the learning in rural and urban schools: Similarities and differences. IEA Research for Education, 13, 213-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85802-5_10
  32. Kefalis, C., & Drigas, A. (2019). Web based and online applications in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(4), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i4.10691
  33. Khusaini, K., & Muvera, M. (2020). Prestasi belajar dan karakteristik orang tua: studi perbandingan sekolah menengah atas perkotaan-pedesaan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 12(2), 296-310. https://bit.ly/Undiksa_jjpe
  34. Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: based on a platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0164-5
  35. Mahdalena, V., & Handayani, L. (2020). Perbedaan pengetahuan belajar siswa di desa dan di kota menggunakan media video [Differences in learning knowledge of students in villages and in cities using video media]. Jurnal Lingkar Studi Komunikasi, 6(2), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.25124/liski.v5i2.3206
  36. Manolitsis, G., Georgiou, G., & Tziraki, N. (2013). Examining the effects of home literacy and numeracy environment on early reading and math acquisition. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 692-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.05.004