Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2020
Accepted
May 19, 2021
Published
September 30, 2021
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 281 Download : 512

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the vertical rice market integration between the rice market at the farmer level and the rice market at the wholesale trader level. This research uses monthly rice price for farmers and wholesaler from January 2013-July 2020 obtained from the Central Bureau of Statistic Indonesia. The results of the cointegration test indicate a long-term balance relationship between price changes at the farm level and prices at the wholesaler level. The estimation results of the vector error correction model show that the short-term balance relationship only occurs between changes in wholesale prices affected by changes in wholesale rice prices three months ago, premium rice prices at the farmer level three months ago and medium rice prices at the farmer level one month ago. The change in rice prices at the farmer level was only the premium rice price which was influenced by changes in the price of rice at the wholesale level three months ago.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Muhlis .

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Muhlis, M., & Nababan, B. O. (2021). INTERGRASI PASAR BERAS VERTIKAL ANTARA PETANI DAN PEDAGANG GROSIR DI INDONESIA. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.20.2.227-238
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aryani, D. 2012. Integrasi Vertikal Pasar Produsen Gabah dengan Pasar Ritel Beras di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi. 11(2): 225-238
  2. Asmarantaka, R. W. 2009. Pemasaran Produk-Produk Pertanian. Bunga Rampai Agribisnis: Seri Pemasaran. Bogor: IPB Press
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. 2019. Statistical yearbook of Indonesia 2019. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistika
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. 2020. Rata-rata Harga Beras di Tingkat Pedagang Besar/Grosir Indonesia. (diakses 25 Agustus 2020). https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/963
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia. 2020. Harga Beras di Penggilingan Menurut Kualitas. (diakses 25 Agustus 2020).
  6. https://www.bps.go.id/subject/36/hargaprodusen.html#subjekViewTab5.
  7. Dewi, N. dan Saputra, A. J. 2017. Analisis Struktur Perilaku dan Kinerja Pasar (Stucture, Conduct and Market Performan) Komoditi Padi Di Desa Bunga Raya dan Desa Kemuning Muda Kecamatan Bunga Raya Siak. Indonesia Journal of Agricultural Economics (IJAE). 19(1): 42-56
  8. Crucini, M. J., Shintani, M., dan Tsuruga, T. 2010. The Law of One Price Without the Border: the Role of Distance Versus Sticky Price. The Economic Journal. 120: 462-480
  9. Gluschenko, K. 2018. Spatial Integration of Siberian Regional Markets. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 85667
  10. Haryani, D. dan Mulyaqin, T. 2013. Kajian Analisis Margin Pemasaran dan Integrasi Pasar Gabah/Beras di Provinsi Banten. Buletin Ikatan. 3(1): 56- 69
  11. Irawan, A. dan Romayanti, D. 2007. Analisis Integrasi Pasar Beras di Bengkulu. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 25(1): 37-54
  12. Kusumaningsih, A. 2015. Analisis Integrasi Pasar Beras di Indonesia. Buletin Bisnis dan Manajemen. 1(2): 130-141
  13. Lihan Irham. 2014. Kajian Struktur Pasar Gabah dan Beras di Indonesia. Jurnal Neo-Bis. 8(1): 63-76
  14. Mankiw, N. G. 2011. Principles of Economics (6th ed). Mason (OH): South-Western Cengage Learning
  15. Meyer, J. dan Von, C. S. 2004. Asymmetric price transmission: survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 55(3): 581-611
  16. Nainggolan, L. B. dan Soetjipto, W. Analisis Efektivitas Kebijakan Harga Pembeliah Pemerintah (HPP) Beras. Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi. 11(2): 126- 142
  17. Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 24 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Harga Pembelian Pemerintah (HPP) Untuk Gabah Atau Beras. 16 Maret 2020
  18. Saragih, A. E. dan Rifin, N. T. A. 2017. Rantai Pasok Produk Beras di Kecamatan Cibeber Kabupaten Cianjur. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis. 14(3): 218- 228
  19. Siswanto, E. dan Sinaga, B. M. 2018. Dampak Kebijakan Perberasan Pada Pasar Beras dan Kesejahteraan Produsen dan Konsumen Beras di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. 23(2): 93-100
  20. Tomek, W. G. dan Robinson, K. L. 1990. Agricultur Product Prices. 2nd edition. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
  21. World Bank. 2011. Perkembangan, Pemicu Dan Dampak Harga Komoditas: Implikasinya Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia. Laporan Perkembangan Sektor Perdagangan. World Bank. Jakarta. Maret 2011
  22. Yuliana, R., et al. 2019. Dampak Perubahan Harga Pangan Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga di Indonesia. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 37(1): 25-45
  23. Zunaidah, A. D., Setiawan, B. dan Anindita, R. 2015. Analisis Integrasi Pasar Apel. Jurnal Habitat. 26(3): 183-194