Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 9, 2021
Accepted
July 27, 2022
Published
September 26, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 502 Download : 560

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The increasing demand for organic vegetables is a business opportunity. Organic farmer groups use this opportunity to supply organic vegetables in the Yogyakarta area. This study aims to determine farmers' motivation level in organic vegetable cultivation and the relationship between internal and external factors with farmer motivation. This research is descriptive. The study focused on the Tranggula Farmers Group and the Merapi Organic Farmers Group as farmer groups that supply organic vegetables in several supermarkets in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The analysis method uses class intervals and Spearman correlation. The motivations in this study include economic, social, and self-actualization motivations. The results showed that farmers' motivation for actualization is a priority in cultivating organic vegetables. There are 63.3% of farmers who have very high actualization motivation, 26.7% of farmers who have very high social motivation, and 16.7% of farmers who have a very high economic motivation. Farmers' motivation level in organic vegetable cultivation is in the high category of 60% and very high at 40%. The experience of farmers has a weak and contradictory relationship with the motivation of farmers to cultivate organic vegetables. Meanwhile, other internal factors, namely age, education, and external factors consisting of the provision of production facilities, assistance, and market guarantees, have no relationship with the motivation of farmers to cultivate organic vegetables.

Keywords

correlation farming experience Indonesia supermarket supplier Yogyakarta

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Retno Lantarsih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Lantarsih, R., Manggala, S., Kadarso, K., & Subeni, S. (2022). MOTIVATION OF FARMER GROUP MEMBERS IN CULTIVATING ORGANIC VEGETABLES. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 21(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.21.2.349-366
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adrianto, R. (2014). Sikap Konsumen Terhadap Beras Organik. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 9(2), 117–126. doi: 10.17358/jma.9.2.117-126
  2. Akmalia, & Barlan, Z. A. (2020). Hubungan Partisipasi Petani Dalam Pertanian Organik Dengan Taraf Hidup (Kasus : Kelurahan Beji , Kecamatan Nguntoronadi , Kabupaten Wonogiri , Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, 4(5), 678–694. doi: 10.29244/jskpm.v4i5.550
  3. Amanda, L., Yanuar, F., & Devianto, D. (2019). Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Tingkat Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Kota Padang. Jurnal Matematika UNAND, 8(1), 179-188. doi: 10.25077/jmu.8.1.179-188.2019
  4. Arifin, M. (2012). Pengendalian Hama Terpadu: Pendekatan Dalam Mewujudkan Pertanian Organik Rasional. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 7(2), 98-107
  5. Arsela, Y., Roessali, W., & Mulyatno, B. (2021). Analysis Of Satisfaction Of Organic Vegetable Farmers Of Bangkit Merbabu Farmer Group Association In Following Business Partnership Program With PT Bloom Agro. Jurnal Agrisep, 20(1), 103–116. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.1.103-116
  6. Astuti, C. C. (2017). Analisis Korelasi Untuk Mengetahui Keeratan Hubungan Antara Keaktifan Mahasiswa Dengan Hasil Belajar Akhir. JICTE (Journal Of Information And Computer Technology Education), 1(1), 1–7. Doi: 10.21070/Jicte.v1i1.1185
  7. Aufanada, V., Ekowati, T., & Prastiwi, W. D. (2017). Kesediaan Membayar (Willingness To Pay) Konsumen Terhadap Produk Sayur Organik Di Pasar Modern Jakarta Selatan. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 3(2), 67–75. doi: 10.18196/agr.3246
  8. Badrudin, R., Nusril, & Aminah, . (2007). Faktor –faktor Sosial Ekonomi Dan Psikologis Yang Berhubungan Dengan Tingkat Partisipasi Anggota Koperasi Citra Baru Sektor Agribisnis. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 6(2), 1–16. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.6.2.1-16
  9. Bakti, I., Novianti, E., Priyatna, C. C., & Budiana, H. R. (2017). Hubungan Antara Karakteristik Individu Petani Dengan Kohesivitas Kelompok Tani Tanaman Obat. PRofesi Humas : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hubungan Masyarakat, 1(2), 153–163. doi: 10.24198/prh.v1i2.10294
  10. Charina, A., Andriani, R., Kusumo, B., Sadeli, A. H., & Deliana, Y. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Petani Dalam Menerapkan Standar Operasional Prosedur (SOP) Sistem Pertanian Organik Di Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 14(1), 68-78. doi: 10.25015/penyuluhan.v14i1.16752
  11. Dasipah, E., Budiyono, H., & Julaeni, M. (2010). Analisis Perilaku Konsumen Dalam Pembelian Produk Sayuran Di Pasar Modern Kota Bekasi. CEFARS: Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Pengembangan Wilayah, 1(2), 24–37. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unismabekasi.ac.id/index.php/cefars/article/view/98/65
  12. Devi, S., & Hartono Georgius. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Konsumen Dalam Membeli Sayuran Organik. Agric, 27(12), 60–67. doi: 10.24246/agric.2015.v27.i1.p60-67
  13. Djazuli, M. (2014). Manfaat dan Proses Sertifikasi Pangan Organik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pertanian Organik, 1, 83–88. Retrieved from http://balittro.litbang.pertanian.go.id
  14. Edwina, S., Maharani, E., Kusumawaty, Y., Yusri, J., & Yusmini, Y. (2020). Analisis Kelembagaan Kelompoktani Sistem Integrasi Sapi Dan Kelapa Sawit (Siska) Di Kabupaten Pelalawan. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 19(1), 145–166. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.19.1.145-166
  15. Hendrayana, J., Kurniati, D., & Kusrini, N. (2020). Hubungan Karakteristik Dan Tingkat Kesejahteraan Petani Pada Usahatani Karet (Studi Kasus Di Desa Teraju Kecamatan Toba Kabupaten Sanggau). Jurnal Agrica, 13(2), 144–153. doi: 10.31289/agrica.v13i2.4196
  16. Humaidi, E., Asriani, P. S., & Priyono, B. S. (2021). Strategi Keberlanjutan Agribisnis Beras Organik. Jurnal Agrisep: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(01), 207–226. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.01.207-226
  17. Inrawan Wiratmadja, I., Nurjanah, N., & Kurniawati, A. (2017). Model Penerimaan Petani Terhadap Teknologi Sistem Pertanian Organik Di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(1), 81–91. doi: 10.12695/jmt.2017.16.1.6
  18. Lantarsih, R., Suryadi, Sulistiya, & Hariadi, U. (2021). Community Motivation To Build Food Security: A Study In Sumberagung Village, Sleman, Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 662(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/662/1/012009
  19. Mayrowani, H. (2012). Pengembangan Pertanian Organik Di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 30(2), 91–108. doi: 10.21082/fae.v30n2.2012.91-108
  20. Ningsih, K., Sakdiyah, H., Felani, H., Dwiastuti, R., & Asmara, R. (2019). Pelestarian Pertanian Organik Buah Naga : Valuasi Ekonomi Dan Simulasi Kebijakan. Jurnal AGRISEP : Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(1), 89–106. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.89-106
  21. Sari, J., Nurmayasari, I., & Yanfika, H. (2015). Persepsi Petani Terhadap Kinerja Penyuluhan Dalam Pengembangan Padi Organik Di Kecamatan Pagelaran Kabupaten Pringsewu. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 3(4), 432–439. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fp.unila.ac.id/index.php/JIA/article/view/1094/999
  22. Silitonga, J., & Salman. (2014). Analisis Permintaan Konsumen Terhadap Sayuran Organik Di Pasar Modern Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Dinamika Pertanian, 29(1), 79–86
  23. Sukanata, I. K., Dukat, & Yuniati, A. (2015). Hubungan Karakteristik Dan Motivasi Petani Dengan Kinerja Kelompok Tani (Studi Kasus Desa Cisaat Kecamatan Dukupuntang). Jurnal Agrijati, 28(1), 17–34
  24. Suprayitno, A. R., Sumardjo, S., Gani, D. S., & Sugihen, B. G. (2015). Motivasi Dan Partisipasi Petani Dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Kemiri Di Kabupaten Maros Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 8(2), 182–196. doi: 10.25015/penyuluhan.v8i2.9883
  25. Tanasale, A. S. (2015). Motivasi Petani Menggunakan Pupuk Organik. Jurnal Ilmiah UNKLAB, 19(1), 54–59
  26. Wahana, S. (2018). Pertanian Organik Dalam Persepsi Petani Desa Bantaragung Sebagai Penjaga Kelestarian Kawasan Hutan TNGC. Logika, 22(3), 51–57
  27. Widayanti, S., Ratnasari, S., Mubarokah, M., & Atasa, D. (2021). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Generasi Milineal Untuk Melanjutkan Usahatani Keluarga Di Kecamatan Mejayan, Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(2), 279–288. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.2.279-288
  28. Wulandari, S., & Wahyudi, A. (2014). Manajemen Resiko Dalam Pengembangan Pertanian Organik Di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pertanian Organik, 18-19 Juni 2014, 51–60. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.2.279-288
  29. Yosidah, A., Fajeri, H., & Septiana, N. (2020). Tingkat Motivasi Petani Sayur Pada Budidaya Sayur Semi Organik Dan Sayur Organik Di Kelurahan Landasan Ulin Utara, Kota Banjarbaru. Frontier Agribisnis, 4(2), 98–107. doi: 10.20527/frontbiz.v4i2.2910