Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 1, 2022
Accepted
January 25, 2023
Published
March 16, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 517 Download : 639

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the reasons for not using rice straw in the rice field landscape of Mandikapau Barat Village, Banjar Regency. Landscape ecology data extracted from Google Maps. Types, rice production, farmer profiles, and knowledge of rice straw utilization were identified through interviews. The relationship between profile and reasons for not using rice straw was determined by bivariate analysis. Results showed that fragments’ shape is generally elongated (70%) and others hexagonal (30%). The corridor in dry rice fields is 40-50 cm narrow, while in wet rice fields, the embankment width is about 60-80 cm. The average ownership of rainfed rice fields was about ±3,917.6 m2. From nine rice field fragments observed, the average area was ±14,788.4 m2. The most widely grown local rice varieties are Siam Pandak Laut and Siam Cantik. The local rice production rate reached ±2.6 Ton Ha-1, while rice straw production was ±3.6 Ton Ha-1. Most respondents are women (76%), smallholders (80%), and aged 40-50 years (48%). Most respondents (84%) stated rice straw could not be used and had been passed down from generation to generation (64%). There was a relationship between gender and knowledge of straw utilization (p=0.036<0.050) and reasons for not using rice straw (p=0.021<0.050).

Keywords

farmers knowledge rice field landscape rice straw

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Anang Kadarsah, Noer Komari, Aminuddin Prahatama Putra, Sunardi, Eko Suhartono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Kadarsah, A., Komari, N., Prahatama Putra, A., Sunardi, & Eko Suhartono. (2023). FARMERS’ KNOWLEDGE ON REASONS NOT TO USE RICE STRAW IN PADDY FIELDS (CASE IN MANDIKAPAU BARAT VILLAGE, BANJAR REGENCY, SOUTH KALIMANTAN). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 22(01), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.22.01.1-14
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bardono, S. (2018). Teknologi Pertanian Ramah Lingkungan Turunkan Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca. Retrieved from http://technology-indonesia.com/pertanian-dan-pangan/inovasi-pertanian/teknologi-pertanian-ramah-lingkungan-turunkan-emisi-gas-rumah-kaca/
  2. Bullock, J. M., & Ding, H. (2018). A Guide to Selecting Ecosystem Service Models for Decision-Making (1st edition). World Resources Institute. Retrieved from https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/ESPA Guide to Ecosystem Services Modeling final web.pdf
  3. Diep, N. Q., Sakanishi, K., Nakagoshi, N., Fujimoto, S., & Minowa, T. (2015). Potential For Rice Straw Ethanol Production In The Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Renewable Energy, 74(2), 456–463. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.051
  4. Hysing, E. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities For The Ecosystem Services Approach: Evaluating Experiences Of Implementation In Sweden. Ecosystem Services, 52, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101372
  5. Janiawati, I. A. A. (2014). Sistem Subak Dan Subak Abian Pada Tatanan Lanskap di Bali. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/9766440/SISTEM_SUBAK_DAN_SUBAK_ABIAN_PADA_TATANAN_LANSKAP_DI_BALI_Subak_and_Subak_Abian_system_in_Landscape_Level_of_Bali_
  6. Kadarsah, A., & Huda, N. (2021). Kajian Aspek Lanskap Tumbuhan Avicennia Sp. dan Interaksi Alamiah Penduduk Lokal Dalam Restorasi Ekosistem Mangrove. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 6(3), 1–8
  7. Kadarsah, A., & Krisdianto. (2018). Identifikasi Karakter Lansekap Dan Aktivitas Antropogenik Dalam Upaya Konservasi Kerang Kapah (Polymesoda erosa) Di Pesisir Pantai Desa Tabanio. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 3(1), 293–300
  8. Karyaningsih, S. (2012). Pemanfaatan Limbah Pertanian Untuk Mendukung Peningkatan Kualitas Lahan Dan Produktivitas Padi Sawah. Buana Sains, 12(2), 45–52. doi: 10.33366/bs.v12i2.132
  9. Klik Kalimantan. (2021). Dapat Penghargaan Proklim Utama, Ini Komponen Terpenuhi Desa Mandikapau Barat dan Ponpes Darul Hijrah. Retrieved from https://klikkalimantan.com/19888/dapat-penghargaan-proklim-utama-ini-komponen-terpenuhi-desa-mandikapau-barat-dan-ponpes-darul-hijrah/
  10. Mahmood, A., & Gheewala, S. H. (2020). A Comparative Assessment Of Rice Straw Management Alternatives In Pakistan In A Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment, 11, 21–29
  11. Maneepitak, S., Ullah, H., Paothong, K., Kachenchart, B., Datta, A., & Shrestha, R. P. (2019). Effect Of Water And Rice Straw Management Practices On Yield And Water Productivity Of Irrigated Lowland Rice In The Central Plain Of Thailand. Agricultural Water Management, 211, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.041
  12. Mantaka, I. N., Sendratari, L. P., & Margi, K. (2017). Pengintegrasian Kearifan Lokal Subak Abian Catu Desa Sambirenteng Buleleng Bali Sebagai Sumber Belajar IPS Di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia, 1(2), 85–95. doi: 10.23887/pips.v1i2.2828
  13. Merang, O. P., Lahjie, A. M., Yusuf, S., & Ruslim, Y. (2019). Kesesuaian Tiga Jenis Padi Lokal Pada Lahan Perladangan Gilir Balik Di Desa Setulang. Agrifor, 18(2), 287-296. doi: 10.31293/af.v18i2.4176
  14. Murnita, M., & Taher, Y. A. (2021). Dampak Pupuk Organik dan Anorganik terhadap Perubahan Sifat Kimia Tanah dan Produksi Tanaman Padi (Oriza sativa L.). LPPM UMSB, 15(02), 67–76. doi: 10.31869/mi.v15i2.2314
  15. Prasetyo, L. B. (2017). Pendekatan Ekologi Lanskap Untuk Konservasi Biodiversitas. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan, IPB University.
  16. Rembang, J. H. W., Rauf, A. W., & Sondakh, J. O. M. (2018). Karakter Morfologi Beberapa Padi Sawah Lokal di Lahan Petani Sulawesi Utara. Bul. Plasma Nutfah, 24(1), 1–8. doi: 10.21082/blpn.v24n1.2018.p1-8
  17. Rochani, S. (2020). Kupas Tuntas Limbah Jerami Padi Untuk Pakan Ternak. Retrieved from http://dkpp.jabarprov.go.id/post/603/kupas-tuntas-limbah-jerami-padi-untuk-pakan-ternak
  18. Safitri, N. D. (2018). Potensi Gas Rumah Kaca Pada Lahan Padi Sawah di Kabupaten Sleman Bagian Barat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia). Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/9509
  19. Santivañez, T., Granados, S., Herrera, M., Nahmías, F., & Caprile, S. (2016). Food Losses and Waste in Latin America and The Caribbean. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/i5504e/i5504e.pdf
  20. Sereenonchai, S., & Arunrat, N. (2022). Farmers’ Perceptions, Insight Behavior And Communication Strategies For Rice Straw And Stubble Management In Thailand. Agronomy, 12(1). doi: 10.3390/agronomy12010200
  21. Suci, I. (2020). Analisis Implementasi Program Kampung Iklim Untuk Meningkatkan Derajat Kesehatan Masyarakat Di Korong Pasa. Jurnal Kependudukan Dan Pembangunan Lingkungan, 1(1), 39–47
  22. Sulistyaningsih, C. R. (2019). Pengolahan Limbah Jerami Padi dengan Limbah Jamu Menjadi Pupuk Organik Plus. Jurnal Surya Masyarakat, 2(1), 58. doi: 10.26714/jsm.2.1.2019.58-68
  23. Tripathi, N., Hills, C. D., Singh, R. S., & Atkinson, C. J. (2009). Biomass Waste Utilisation In Low-Carbon Products : Harnessing A Major Potential Resource. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41612-019-0093-5
  24. Vera, I. A. De. (2018). Correlation Of Rice Waste Utilization To Pangasinan Men And Women Farmers Environmental Awareness, Willingness, Knowledge And Lifestyle. Journal of Gender Studies, 1(1), 1–10
  25. WHO & CBD. (2015). Connecting Global Priorities: Biodiversity and Human Health. Switzerland: WHO Press
  26. Wulandari, W., Herman, & Fatonah, S. (2013). Potensi Pertumbuhan Dan Produksi Hasil Empat Varietas Padi Lokal Terhadap Tanah Mineral Dan Tanah Gambut. (Skripsi, Universitas Riau, Riau, Indonesia). Retrieved from https://repository.unri.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/3616/Karya Ilmiah Wuri Wulandari.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  27. Yonavilbia, E. (2021, November 2). Desa Mandikapau, Satu Dari Delapan Desa Tanpa Kemiskinan se-Indonesia. Retrieved from https://infopublik.id/kategori/nusantara/577554/desa-mandikapau-satu-dari-delapan-desa-tanpa-kemiskinan-se-indonesia
  28. Zhang, B., Tian, H., Ren, W., Tao, B., Lu, C., Yang, J., Banger, K., & Pan, S. (2016). Methane Emissions From Global Rice Fields: Magnitude, Spatiotemporal Patterns, And Environmental Controls. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 30 (9), 1246–1263. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13280