Main Article Content

Abstract

The land conversion of rice farming could only be prevented by increasing farming competitiveness. The first step is to map the resource availability supporting paddy farming and income achievement. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze resource availability and income achievement to increase paddy business competitiveness. It used a survey method and observed two populations of farmers producing paddy seed and rice in Tanjung Lago and Rambutan Districts, Banyuasin Regency. Simple random sampling was adopted to determine 130 respondents from two populations, each with 65 rice and paddy seed farmers. The findings showed that resource availability supports farming in tidal land, though it is significantly higher for paddy seed than rice farmers. Regarding income achievements, paddy seed farmers also have higher R/C and B/C values than rice farmers. Income for rice farmers mainly comes from corn, rubber, and oil palm, while paddy seed farmers earn from their farming. This implies that the chance of land conversion into plantations and corn farming is greater for rice than for paddy seed farmers. When this happens on a large scale and in the long term, it impacts national rice production. Therefore, improved resource availability and better integration in production could sustainably increase paddy farming production in tidal land.

Keywords

income index mapping resources

Article Details

How to Cite
Adriani, D., Purbiyanti, E., Novita Sari, S., M Hunza, Dini Damayanthy, & Merna Ayu Sulastri. (2024). Resources Availability And Income Achievement: A Driving Force For Competitiveness Of Rice Farming Products In Tidal Land, South Sumatera, Indonesia. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 23(02), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.23.02.327-350

References

  1. Adriani, D., et al. (2017). Technological Innovation And Business Diversification: Sustainability Livelihoods Improvement Scenario Of Rice Farmer Household In Sub-Optimal Land. Russian Journal Of Agricultural And Socio-Economic Sciences, 9(69), 77-88. doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2017-09.10
  2. Adriani, D., et al. (2016). Modal Sosial Rumah Tangga Petani Tanaman Pangan: Mampukah Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani Di Lahan Pasang Surut. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal 2016, (pp. 415-431). Retrieved from Modal Sosial Rumah Tangga Petani Tanaman Pangan : Mampukah Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani Di Lahan Pasang Surut? - PDF Free Download (adoc.pub)
  3. Aldaibat, B. (2017). The Role of Social Capital in Enhancing Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(4), 66-78. Retrieved from https://europub.co.uk/articles/the-role-of-social-capital-in-enhancing-competitive-advantage-A-406632
  4. Antriyandarti, E. (2015). Competitiveness And Cost Efficiency Of Rice Farming In Indonesia. Journal of Rural Problems, 51(2), 74-85. doi: 10.7310/arfe.51.74
  5. Appiah, D.O., Asante, F., Nketiah, B. (2019). Perspectives On Agricultural Land Use Conversion And Food Security In Rural Ghana. SCI, 1(1), 1-14. doi: 10.3390/sci1010014.v1
  6. Cooper, L., & Ellent. (2000). Public Participation And Social Acceptability In The Philippines Eia Process. Journal Of Environmental Assessment Policy And Management, 2(3), 339-367. doi: 10.1142/S1464333200000400
  7. Dewi, R., Kastolani., & Eridiana, W. (2016). Pengaruh Konversi Lahan Pada Pembangunan Jalan Tol Cisumdawa Terhadap Perubahan Status Sosial Dan Ekonomi Petani Di Kecamatan Rangcakalong Kabupaten Sumedang. Jurnal Antologi Pendidikan Geografi, 4(2), 12-25. Retrieved from https://repository.upi.edu/26170/
  8. DFID. (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development. United Kingdom. Retreived from livelihoodscentre.org/documents/114097690/114438878/Sustainable+livelihoods+guidance+sheets.pdf/594e5ea6-99a9-2a4e-f288-cbb4ae4bea8b?t=1569512091877
  9. Dinata, K. (2021). Strategi Peningkatan Indeks Pertanaman Padi Sawah Di Kabupaten Lebong. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 20(2), 305–320. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.20.2.305-320
  10. Djaenudin, D., et al. (2016). Modelling Of Land Allocation Behavior In Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 33(1), (pp. 78-86). doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.059
  11. Ellis. (2000). Rural Livelihoods And Diversity In Developing Countries. Oxford. Oxford University Press. England. Retrived from: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/rural-livelihoods-and-diversity-in-developing-countries-9780198296966?cc=us&lang=en&.
  12. Eriyati., Rosyeti., & Sari, L. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Konversi Lahan di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Ekonomi. 23(3), 134-142. doi: 10.31258/je.23.3.p.134-142
  13. Euler, M., et al. (2016). Oil Palm Expansion Among Smallholder Farmers In Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(3), 658-676. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12163
  14. Ganesh, S., & Shrestha, A. (2005). Analysis Of Livelihood Asset Pentagon To Assess The Performance Of Irrigation Systems. Water International, 30(3), 363-371. doi: 10.1080/02508060508691877
  15. Handayani, E. P., & Isnaini, S. (2023). Analysis Of Chemical Soil Properties And Social Economic Study Of Swampland Rice Productivity. Malaysian Journal Of Soil Science, 27(1), 186-195. Retrieved from https://msss.com.my/mjss/Full%20Text/vol27/V27_15.pdf
  16. Hatta, M., et al. (2023). Food Self-Sufficiency: Managing The Newly-Opened Tidal Paddy Fields For Rice Farming In Indonesia (A Case Study In West Kalimantan, Indonesia). Heliyon, 9(3), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13839
  17. Hidayati, H. Nurul, & R. A. Kinseng, (2013). Konversi Lahan Pertanian Dan Sikap Petani Di Desa Cihideung Ilir Kabupaten Bogor. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 1(3), 222-230. Retrived from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/180248-ID-none.pdf
  18. Ilham, K. (2014). Konversi Lahan Pertanian di Pantai Utara. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES
  19. IPSARD. (2017). Policy Brief on Paddy Land Conversion. Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development (IPSARD). Australia. Retrieved from http://aus4reform.org.vn/en/Library/Restructuring-of-the-Rural-Economy/Publications/policy-brief-on-paddy-land-conversion-437714/
  20. Isa. (2016). Strategi Pengendalian Alih Fungsi Lahan Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Kementrian Pertanian. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian doi: 10.12962/j2716179X.v16i1.8726
  21. Jos T. A, et al. (2010). Agricultural Use Of Wetlands: Opportunities And Limitations. Ann Bot. 105(1), 155–163. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/105/1/155/245730
  22. Kauffman, N. S. (1999). Credit Markets And Land Ownership For Young And Beginning Farmers. CHOICES: The Maganize Of Food, Farm, And Resources Issues 2nd Quarter, 28(2), 1-5. Retrieved from: http://www.choicesmagazine.org/UserFiles/file/cmsarticle_308.pdf
  23. Kusnadi, N., et al. (2011). Analisis Efisiensi Usaha Tani Padi Di Beberapa Sentra Produksi Padi Di Indonesia (Rice Farming Efficiency Analysis In Some Rice Producing Areas In Indonesia). Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 29(1), 25–48. doi: 10.21082/jae.v29n1.2011.25-48
  24. Li, J. L. (2014): Land Sale Venue And Economic Growth Path: Evidence From China’s S Urban Land Market. Habitat Int., 41(1), 307–313. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.001
  25. Mekuria, W, et al. (2018). Competition For Land Resources: Driving Forces And Consequences In Crop-Livestock Production Systems Of The Ethiopian Highlands. Ecological Processes, 7(30), 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s13717-018-0143-7
  26. Michael E. P. (2004). Building The Microeconomic Foundations Of Prosperity: Findings From The Business Competitiveness Index. New York: Harvard University. Retrieved from https://www.choicesmagazine.org/UserFiles/file/cmsarticle_308.pdf
  27. Milstein, A, et al. (2005). Characterization Of Water Quality In Shrimp Ponds Of Different Sizes And With Different Management Regimes Using Multivariate Statistics Analysis. Aquaculture International, 13(2), 501-518. doi: 10.1007/s10499-005-9001-6
  28. Mukhoriyah, R. (2012). Kajian Nilai Ekologi-Ekonomi Lahan Sawah Dan Kaitannya Dengan Rencana Tata Ruang Di Kota Depok. (Tesis, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Indonesia). Jakarta. Retrieved from https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20315204
  29. Munteanu, C., et al. (2014). Forest And Agricultural Land Change In The Carpathian Region-A Meta Analysis Of Long-Term Patterns And Drivers Of Change. Land Use Policy, 38(1), 685-697.
  30. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.012
  31. Najim, M., et al. (2007). Sustainability Of Rice Production: A Malaysian Perspective. Journal Of Agricultural Sciences– Sri Lanka, 3(1), 1-12. doi: 10.4038/jas.v3i1.8138
  32. Notarianto, D. (2011). Analisis Efisiensi Penggunaan Faktor-faktor Produksi Pada Usahatani Padi Organik dan Padi Anorganik (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Sambirejo, Kabupaten Sragen). (Skripsi, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia). Retrieved from: http://eprints.undip.ac.id/29749/
  33. Odeh, B. (2014). The Role Of Social Capital In Achieving A Competitive Advantage. Alanbar University Journal For Administrative And Economic Sciences, 6(11), 255-272. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/invention.journals/docs/i0604026678
  34. Pearson, S., Gotsch, & Bahri. (2005). Aplikasi Policy Analysis Matrix Pada Pertanian Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
  35. Prasekti, Y. H. (2018). Analisa Ekonomi Usaha Penangkar Benih Padi Ciherang (Di Kelurahan Tamanan Kec. Tulungagung Kab. Tulungagung). Jurnal AGRIBIS, 4(2), 1-11. Retrieved from http://journal.unita.ac.id/index.php/agribisnis/article/view/38
  36. Purbiyanti, E., et al. (2021). Water-System Changes In Swampy Rice Agro-Ecosystems Area And Their Economic Impacts On Farmers In South Sumatra, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 800(1), (pp. 1-8) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/800/1/012030.
  37. Ratmini N. P. S., & Hendra H. (2019). Productivity Of Tidal Swamp Rice Varieties In Diferent Types Of Flooding. In: Herlinda S et al. (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal 2019, (pp. 559-566). Palembang: UNSRI Press. Retrieved from: https://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/lahansuboptimal/article/view/1671
  38. Rodrigues A. M. M. (2018). Resource Availability And Adjustment Of Social Behaviour Influence Patterns Of Inequality And Productivity Across Societies. PeerJ, 6(3), 1-15. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5488
  39. Rondhi, M., et al. (2018). Agricultural Land Conversion, Land Economic Value, And Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study In East Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Land, 7(4), 1-19. doi: 10.3390/land704014
  40. Saragih, S., Lassa, Jonatab., & A. Ramli. (2007). Kerangka Penghidupan Berkelanjutan (Sustainable Livelihood Framework). Jakarta: Center For Development Research. Retrieved from https://www.zef.de/uploads/tx_zefportal/Publications/2390_SL-Chapter1.pdf
  41. Sihaloho, M., et al. (2007). Konversi Lahan Pertanian Dan Perubahan Struktur Agraria. Jurnal Sodality Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 1(2): 253-270. doi:10.22500/sodality.v1i2.5928
  42. Sitko, N. J., & Jayne, T. S. (2014). Structural Transformation Or Elite Land Capture? The Growth Of “Emergent” Farmers In Zambia. Food Policy, 48(2), 2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.05.006
  43. Subekti. (2015). Perlindungan Lahan Pertanian Dalam Mengantisipasi Alih Fungsi Tanah Akibat Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan. Jurnal Yustisia, 4(2), 439-455. Retrived from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/%20viewFile/8662/7750
  44. Susilawati, A., Nursyamsi, D., & M. Syakir. (2016). Optimalisasi Penggunaan Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut Mendukung Swasembada Pangan Nasional. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 10(1), 51-64. Retrieved from https://epublikasi.pertanian.go.id/berkala/jsl/article/view/3363/3396
  45. Susilowati, et al. (2012). Panel Petani Nasional (Patanas): Dinamika Indikator Pembangunan Pertanian Dan Perdesaan. Research Report. Indonesian Center For Agricultural Socio Economic And Policy Studies. Ministry Of Agriculture. Agro Ekonomi, 28(1), 19-31. Retrieved from https://kmc-pengairan.bappenas.go.id/knowledge-management/244
  46. Sutopo, L. (2004). Teknologi Benih. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
  47. The Central Bureau Of Statistics Of South Sumatra. (2022). The Central Bureau Of Statistics Of South Sumatra. Retrieved from https://sumsel.bps.go.id/publication
  48. Wahyunto & F. Widiastuti. (2014). Lahan Sawah Sebagai Pendukung Ketahanan Pangan Serta Strategi Pencapaian Kemandirian Pangan. Jurnal Sumberdaya Alam, 12(1), 17-30. doi:10.2018/jsdl.v8i3.6479
  49. Widiastuti, I., & Inaoka, T. (2015). Small-Scale Freshwater Aquaculture Practices In Indonesia (Farmers' Livelihood And Impacts On Environment). People And Culture In Oceania, 30(30), 73-88. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsos/30/0/30_73/_pdf/-char/ja
  50. Wijayanti, N., Syahdi, M., & Siti, N. (2023). Marketing Strategy of Sumbawa Forest Honey in Sumbawa Regency . Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 22(02), 285–302. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.22.02.285-302
  51. Zahri, I., et al. (2018). Comparing Rice Farming Appearance Of Different Agro-Ecosystems In South Sumatra, Indonesia. Bulgarian Journal Of Agricultural Science, 24(2), 189–198. Retrieved from https://www.agrojournal.org/24/02-03.pdf