Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 15, 2023
Accepted
September 2, 2024
Published
September 11, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 349 Download : 127

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of certified quality seeds is critical to increasing agricultural productivity. However, its use still needs to be improved in Bengkayang Regency, especially in hilly areas that pose unique challenges to agricultural practices. This study analyzed the influence of farmers' attitudes on their decision to use certified quality seed in the region. The research method used a mixed approach, combining descriptive analysis to collect data through a comprehensive questionnaire from farmers who have and have not used certified quality seeds. The sample consisted of 111 farmers in the Bengkayang district, representing a wide range of farming backgrounds and experiences. Fishbein's multi-attribute analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used for in-depth data analysis, which provided vital insights into the factors influencing farmers' decisions. The results showed that farmers positively evaluated several attributes of certified quality seed, indicating confidence in its reliability, yield potential, and relevance to local conditions. These positive attitudes are mainly driven by agricultural motivation, perceived economic benefits, and careful decision evaluation. It is important to note that effective, cognitive, and cognitive attitudes jointly influence farmers' decision-making in selecting certified quality seed, indicating the complexity of the adoption process involving emotional, rational, and behavioral aspects. The results of this study provide valuable information for rice farmers and policymakers at the government level to design effective strategies to increase the use of quality seeds. Recommendations are developing targeted extension programs, improving access to quality seeds, and implementing incentives to encourage wider adoption among farmers in Bengkayang Regency.

Keywords

Attitude Certified Superior Seeds Decision

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Asih Sri Wulandari, Dewi Kurniati, Maswandi Maswandi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Wulandari, A. S., Kurniati, D., & Maswadi, M. (2024). The Influence Of Attitude On Farmers’ Decision-Making Process In Using Certified Quality Seeds In Hilly Areas. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 23(02), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.23.02.501-528
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aisyah, S., Nahraeni, W., & Arsyad, A. (2020). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Program Seribu Desa Mandiri Benih Di Kabupaten Bogor (Studi Kasus Kelompok Tani “Mitra Tani” Desa Karehkel, Kecamatan Leuwiliang-Kabupaten Bogor). Jurnal Agribisains, 6(2), 69-80. doi: 10.30997/jagi.v6i2.3530
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory Of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Asfaw, S., et al. (2012). Impact Of Modern Agricultural Technologies On Smallholder Welfare: Evidence From Tanzania And Ethiopia. Food Policy, 37(3), 283-295. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.013
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review Of Psychology, 52, 1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
  5. BPS. (2022). Kabupaten Bengkayang Dalam Angka 2022. Retrieved from https://bengkayangkab.bps.go.id/publication/2022/02/25/fe2f1189f41f77cac5adc614/kabupaten-bengkayang-dalam-angka-2022.html
  6. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, And The Human Brain. New York: Putnam
  7. Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison Of Convenience Sampling And Purposive Sampling. American Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  8. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts Of Reasoning, Judgment, And Social Cognition. Annual Review Of Psychology, 59, 255-278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
  9. Fisher, M., & Carr, E. R. (2015). The Influence Of Gendered Roles And Responsibilities On The Adoption Of Technologies That Mitigate Drought Risk: The Case Of Drought-Tolerant Maize Seed In Eastern Uganda. Global Environmental Change, 35, 82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.009
  10. Hair, J. F., et al. (2010). Multivariate-Data-Analysis-7th-Edition. London: Pearson Education
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables And Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–51. doi: 10.2307/3151312
  12. Ghimire, R., Wen-chi, H., & Shrestha, R. B. (2015). Factors Affecting Adoption Of Improved Rice Varieties Among Rural Farm Households In Central Nepal. Rice Science, 22(1), 35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.006
  13. Prafithriasari, M., & Fathiyakan, G. (2017). Analisis Sikap Dan Kepuasan Petani Dalam Menggunakan Benih Padi Varietas Lokal Pandanwangi (Studi Kasus Di Desa Bunikasih Dan Desa Tegallega Kecamatan Warungkondang). Agroscience (Agsci), 7(2), 290-298. doi: 10.35194/agsci.v7i2.154
  14. Gonzalvo, C. M., Aala, W. J. F., & Maharjan, K. L. (2021). Farmer Decision-Making On The Concept Of Coexistence: A Comparative Analysis Between Organic And Biotech Farmers In The Philippines. Agriculture, 11, 1-20. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11090857
  15. Hernowo, H., Sutanto, A., & Suyono. (2023). Kegiatan On-Farm Dan Off-Farm Sebagai Usaha Di Sektor Pertanian: Persepsi Pemuda Di Kabupaten Purbalingga On-Farm And Off-Farm Activities As A Business In The Agricultural Sector: Perceptions Of Youth In Purbalingga Regency. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 7(2), 472–492. doi: 10.21776/ub.jepa.2023.007.02.5
  16. Hukom, J., Kakisina, L. O., & Sari, R. M. (2019). Analisis Produktivitas Petani Sayuran Daun Di Desa Passo Kecamatan Baguala Kota Ambon. Agrilan: Jurnal Agribisnis Kepulauan, 7(3), 227-240. doi: 10.30598/agrilan.v7i3.902
  17. Hotmarida, S., Ayu, S. F., & Rahmanta. (2020). Factors That Influence The Decision Of Coffee Farmers To Take Credit In North Sumatra. IOP Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science, 454(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012017
  18. Java, W., et al. (2020). Factors Affecting Farmers In Adopting VUB Rice Seeds In Cianjur Regency Factors Affecting Farmers In Adopting VUB Rice Seeeds In Cianjur Regency West Java. International Journal Of Progressive Sciences And Technologies (IJPSAT), 21(2), 239–245. doi: 10.52155/ijpsat.v21.2.1976
  19. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis Of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
  20. Kassie, M., et al. (2013). Adoption Of Interrelated Sustainable Agricultural Practices In Smallholder Systems: Evidence From Rural Tanzania. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 80(3), 525-540. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.007
  21. Latan, H., & Ghozali, I. (2014). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods And Applications Using Warppls 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  22. Lambrecht, I., et al. (2014). Understanding The Process Of Agricultural Technology Adoption: Mineral Fertilizer In Eastern DR Congo. World Development, 59, 132-146. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.024
  23. Lerner, J. S., et al. (2015). Emotion And Decision Making. Annual Review Of Psychology, 66, 799-823. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
  24. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building A Practically Useful Theory Of Goal Setting And Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  25. Loewenstein, G. F., et al. (2001). Risk As Feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
  26. Manda, J., et al. (2016). Adoption And Impacts Of Sustainable Agricultural Practices On Maize Yields And Incomes: Evidence From Rural Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(1), 130-153. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12127
  27. Maredia, M. K., et al. (2019). Farmer Perception And Valuation Of Seed Quality: Evidence From Bean And Cowpea Seed Auctions In Tanzania And Ghana. Agricultural Economics, 50(4), 495-507. doi: 10.1111/agec.12505
  28. Mayalibit, N. F., et al. (2018). Sikap Petani Padi Terhadap Benih Unggul Padi Bersertifikat Di Kecamatan Karangpandan, Kabupaten Karanganyar. Caraka Tani: Journal Of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(2), 116-125. doi: 10.20961/carakatani.v32i2.15090
  29. McGuire, S., & Sperling, L. (2016). Seed Systems Smallholder Farmers Use. Food Security, 8(1), 179-195. doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0528-8
  30. Mghweno O. N., Mishili, F. J., & Nchimbi-Msolla, S. (2020). Farmers’ Decision To Purchase Quality Declared Seeds In Kongwa District, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 19(2), 203–215. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/tjags/article/view/205098
  31. Muange, E. N., Schwarze, S., & Qaim, M. (2014). Social Networks And Farmer Exposure To Improved Crop Varieties In Tanzania. Agricultural Economics, 45(6), 715-725. doi: 10.1111/agec.12117
  32. Mustika, M., Fariyanti, A., & Tinaprilla, N. (2019). Analisis Sikap Dan Kepuasan Petani Terhadap Atribut Asuransi Usahatani Padi Di Kabupaten Karawang Jawa Barat. Forum Agribisnis, 9(2), 200–214. doi: 10.29244/fagb.9.2.200-214
  33. Nasution, M. P., & Pinem, L. J. (2020). Analisis Sikap Dan Kepuasan Petani Dalam Menggunakan Benih Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis) Bersertifikat Di Kabupaten Labuhan Batu Utara. Agrimor, 5(3), 40–44. doi: 10.32938/ag.v5i3.856
  34. Novita, D., Sari, L. A., & Hendrawan, D. (2020). Persepsi Dan Tingkat Kepuasan Petani Dalam Penggunaan Benih Padi Bersertifikasi Di Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Agrica, 13(2), 136–143. doi: 10.31289/agrica.v13i2.3989
  35. Nurhesti A., Bakri, M., & Firdamayanti, E. (2022). Analisis Faktor Sikap Petani Tidak Menggunakan Benih Padi Bersertifikat Di Desa Olang Kecamatan Ponrang Selatan Kabupaten Luwu. Wanatani, 2(1), 27–35. doi: 10.51574/jip.v2i1.68
  36. Pao, A., & Enteding, A. S. (2019). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Sikap Petani Dalam Menggunakan Benih Padi Bersertifikat Di Desa Beteleme Kecamatan Lembo, Kabupaten Morowali. Agrobisnis, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.32529/ja.v2i1.633
  37. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model Of Persuasion. Advances In Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  38. Purba, T., Tarigan, K., & Supriana, T. (2022). Analisis Sikap Dan Preferensi Petani Terhadap Penggunaan Benih Padi Varietas Unggul di Kabupaten Langkat Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Agrica, 15(1), 35–47. doi: 10.31289/agrica.v15i1.5169
  39. Saengavut, V., & Jirasatthumb, N. (2021). Smallholder Decision-Making Process In Technology Adoption Intention: Implications For Dipterocarpus Alatus In Northeastern Thailand. Heliyon, 7(4), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06633
  40. Santoso, A. (2023). Rumus Slovin: Panacea 1 Masalah Ukuran Sampel. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 4(2), 24–43. doi: 10.24071/suksma.v4i2.6434
  41. Sativa, R. D. O., Ibrahim, J. T., & Sutawi, S. (2021). Analysis Of Taking Decision Of Farmers In Choosing Rice Cultivars: Case Of Pakel District, Tulungagung, Indonesia. E3S Web Of Conferences, 226, 1-9. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202122600037
  42. Shiferaw, B., et al. (2014). Adoption Of Improved Wheat Varieties And Impacts On Household Food Security In Ethiopia. Food Policy, 44, 272-284. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.09.012
  43. Simluhtan. (2022). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Penyuluhan Pertanian. Retrieved from https://app3.pertanian.go.id/simluh/
  44. Slovic, P., et al. (2007). The Affect Heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
  45. Spielman, D. J., & Kennedy, A. (2016). Towards Better Metrics And Policymaking For Seed System Development: Insights From Asia's Seed Industry. Agricultural Systems, 147, 111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.015
  46. Suyudi, S., & Mamoen, H. M. I. (2021). Farmers’ Motivation In Mendong Farming. Journal Of Agri Socio-Economics And Business, 3(1), 43–58. doi: 10.31186/jaseb.3.1.43-58
  47. Theresia, V., Fariyanti, A., & Tinaprilla, N. (2016). Pengambilan Keputusan Petani Terhadap Penggunaan Benih Bawang Merah Lokal Dan Impor Di Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat. AGRARIS: Journal Of Agribusiness And Rural Development Research, 2(1), 50–60. doi: 10.18196/agr.2125
  48. UPTPSB. (2021). Laporan Capaian Kinerja UPT Pengawasan Dan Sertifikasi Benih Dinas Tanaman Pangan Dan Hortikultura Provinsi Kalimantan Barat. Retrieved from https://distan.kalbarprov.go.id/sites/default/files/Laporan%20Kinerja%20Tahun%202021.pdf