Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 7, 2024
Accepted
August 20, 2024
Published
September 18, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 350 Download : 172

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

North Sumatera is the largest producer of arabica coffee in Indonesia with 29%. However, coffee farmers are always faced with various field problems such as high fertilizer prices, declining production and various traditional cultivation practices that cause low productivity levels. So that in maintaining overall cropping it is necessary to know the efficiency of farm management with efficient coffee management it can increase farmer income, improve the quality of life of farmers, absorb labor, reduce costs and create a sustainable system. The method used in this research is to use the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model to determine the efficient value and the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model to determine the efficient influence. The results of this research with the DEA model show that from a total of 133 respondents, the inefficient value is 51%, low efficient 25%, medium efficient 13%, and low efficient 11%. While the OLS model shows that the total cost and total income of farmers can significantly affect the efficiency value, the total production of farmers has no influence on the efficiency value. The research findings imply that improving efficiency requires modernizing technology to overcome traditional management such as the use of superior seeds and fertilizer inputs to increase land production. It also requires the support of relevant policies and institutions that are able to guarantee the availability of production facilities such as superior seeds and fertilizers that are easily available to farmers at affordable prices.

Keywords

arabica coffee efficiency income contribution indigenous people smallholder plantations

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Tri Martial, Ummu Harmain, Ahmad Rizki Harahap, Mitra Musika, Muhammad Arief Tirtana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Tri Martial, Ummu Harmain, Ahmad Rizki Harahap, Mitra Musika, & Muhammad Arief Tirtana. (2024). Enhancing Farm Household Income Through Efficient Arabica Coffee Cultivation In Simalungun, North Sumatera. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 23(02), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.23.02.425-452
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adegbeye., et al. (2020). Sustainable Agriculture Options For Production, Greenhouse Gasses And Pollution Alleviation, And Nutrient Recycling In Emerging And Transitional Nations-An Overview. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 242(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118319
  2. Adenle, A. A., Wedig, K., & Azadi, H. (2019). Sustainable Agriculture And Food Security In Africa: The Role Of Innovative Technologies And International Organizations. Technology In Society, 58(1). 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.05.007
  3. Ahdiningtyas, M., et al. (2023). Efisiensi Teknis Dan Ekonomis Pada Usahatani Padi Di Desa Alang-Alang Kecamatan Tragah Kabupaten Bangkalan. Agricultural Socio-Economic Empowerment And Agribusiness Journal, 1(2), 59-68. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/agrisema/article/view/62663/39368
  4. Andrea E., et al. (2022). Impact Pathways Of Voluntary Sustainability Standards On Smallholder Coffee Producers In Honduras: Price Premiums, Farm Productivity, Production Costs, Access To Credit. World Development Perspectives. 27(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100435
  5. Arief, H., & Nurlina, L. (2021). Pengelolaan Diversifikasi Usaha Berbasis Kopi di Desa Nanggerang Kecamatan Sukasari Kabupaten Sumedang. Media Kontak Tani Ternak, 3(2), 56-63. doi: 10.24198/mktt.v3i2.34986
  6. Ayamga, J. A., Ayawine, A., & Ayentimi, D. T. (2023). Women Empowerment And Food-Nutrition Security In Sierra Leone: The Gender Model Family Approach. Agriculture & Food Security, 12(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40066-023-00445-1
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Statistik Kopi Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik
  8. Bambio, et al. (2018). Land Tenure Security And Investment: Does Strength Of Land Right Really Matter In Rural Burkina Faso? World Development, 111(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.026
  9. Barus, E. F., Priyarsono, D. S., & Hartoyo, S. (2021). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis, Alokatif dan Ekonomi Produksi Kubis di Kabupaten Karo. Jurnal Agrica, 14(2), 116-130. Retrieved from https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/agrica/article/view/4458/pdf
  10. Bopp, C., et al. (2019). The Role Of Farmers’ Intrinsic Motivation In The Effectiveness Of Policy Incentives To Promote Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Journal Of Environmental Management, 244(1), 320-327. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.107
  11. BPS Sumatera Utara. 2022. Luas Tanaman Dan Produksi Kopi Arabica Tanaman Perkebunan Rakyat Menurut Kabupaten/Kota.
  12. Bullock, J. M., et al. (2024). Mapping The Ratio Of Agricultural Inputs To Yields Reveals Areas With Potentially Less Sustainable Farming. Science Of The Total Environment, 909(2), 84-96. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168491
  13. Byamugisha., et al. (2023). The Investment Case For Land Tenure Security In Sub-Saharan Africa: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal Of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 14(1), 272–300. doi:10.1017/bca.2023.14
  14. Carolina et al. (2022). Analisis Efisiensi Pemasaran Kopi Robusta. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 10(1), 113–25. doi: 10.29244/jai.2022.10.1.113-125
  15. Cavalaris, C. (2023). Challenges And Opportunities For Cost-Effective Use Of Unmanned Aerial System In Agriculture. Unmanned Aerial Systems In Agriculture, 1(1), 197–229. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-91940-1.00009-8
  16. Chen, G., et al. (2019). Developing Sustainable Summer Maize Production For Smallholder Farmers In The North China Plain: An Agronomic Diagnosis Method. Journal Of Integrative Agriculture, 18(8), 1667–79. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62151-3.
  17. Daba, et al. (2023). Assessment Of Farmers’ Knowledge And Perceptions Of Coffee Yield Reduction Due To Weeds And Their Management In Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(8), 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19183
  18. Eernstman, N., &. Wals, A. E. J. (2009). Interfacing Knowledge Systems: Introducing Certified Organic Agriculture In A Tribal Society. NJAS - Wageningen Journal Of Life Sciences, 56(4), 375–90. doi: 10.1016/S1573-5214(09)80005-5
  19. El B., et al. (2018). Transition Towards Sustainability In Agriculture And Food Systems: Role Of Information And Communication Technologies. Information Processing In Agriculture, 5(4), 456–64. doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2018.06.006
  20. Franco G., et al. (2021). The Migration-Sustainability Paradox: Transformations in Mobile Worlds. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49(1), 98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.013
  21. Gomori, et al. (2023). Using TAPE To Assess Agroecology On Women-Led Farms In The U.S.: Support For Environmental And Social Practices.” Journal Of Agriculture, Food Systems, And Community Development, 13(1), 129–50. doi: 10.5304/jafscd.2023.131.003
  22. Grossman., J. M. (2003). Exploring Farmer Knowledge Of Soil Processes In Organic Coffee Systems Of Chiapas, Mexico. Geoderma, 111,(3–4), 267–87. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00268-9
  23. Gusti., et al. (2022). The Affecting Of Farmer Ages, Level Of Education And Farm Experience Of The Farming Knowledge About Kartu Tani Beneficial And Method Of Use In Parakan Distric, Temanggung Regency. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 19(2), 209–221. doi:10.36762/jurnaljateng.v19i2.926
  24. Hasibuan., et al. (2020). Analisis Konversi Lahan Karet Menjadi Kelapa Sawit Di Desa Permainan Kecamatan Hutaraja Tinggi. Agriland, 8(2), 149–57. doi: 10.30743/agr.v8i2.3080
  25. Hassan., et al. (2024). Effective Extension and Access to Education Drive Optimal Adoption of Climate-Smart Agriculture Interventions in Affected Tidal Floodplains: A Case Study. Heliyon, 10(11), 1-14. Retrieved from https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)07647-3
  26. Herlina., et al. (2019). Analisis Efisiensi Penggunaan Faktor-Faktor Produksi Usahatani Padi Sawah Di Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut Desa Sungai Kakap Kecamatan Sungai Kakap Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Jurnal Social Economic Of Agriculture, 8(1), 22–30.doi: 10.26418/j.sea.v8i1.34129
  27. Herudin., et al. (2021). Konversi Usahatani Karet Menjadi Usahatani Kelapa Sawit Kecamatan Belitang Hilir Kabubaten Sekadau. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 18(1), 27–39. Retrieved from https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jsep/article/download/18459/7537
  28. Hidayati, R. (2021). Efisiensi Teknis Dan Sumber Inefisiensi Teknis Pada Usahatani Padi Organik Di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Bisnis Tani 7(2), 67–77. Retrieved from http://jurnal.utu.ac.id/jbtani/article/view/4339
  29. Hosen., et al. (2017). Analisis Efisiensi, Profitabilitas Dan Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Di Indonesia Periode 2010-2013. Journa Perbanas, 4(3), 207–27. Retrieved from https://journal.perbanas.id/index.php/jkp/article/view/196
  30. Huber., et al. (2023). Marginal Climate Change Abatement Costs in Swiss Dairy Production Considering Farm Heterogeneity and Interaction Effects. Agricultural Systems, 207(10), 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369702486_Marginal_climate_change_abatement_costs_in_Swiss_dairy_production_considering_farm_heterogeneity_and_interaction_effects
  31. Jumiat.i, et al. (2014). Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Kopi Di Kabupaten Tana Tidung (KTT). Agrifor: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian dan Kehutanan, 8(2), 155–64. Retrieved from http://ejurnal.untag-smd.ac.id/index.php/AG/article/view/858/1034
  32. Kehinde., et al. (2021). Heliyon Does Social Capital Improve Farm Productivity and Food Security? Evidence from Cocoa-Based Farming Households in Southwestern Nigeria. Heliyon 7(3), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06592
  33. Kenamon., et al. (2021). Efisiensi Teknis, Struktur Biaya, Dan Pendapatan Penangkaran Benih Padi Inbrida Di Kecamatan Bumi Ratu Nuban Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 9(4), 1-16. doi: 10.23960/jiia.v9i4.5388
  34. Khan., et al. (2023). Climate Change Impact on Sustainable Agricultural Growth: Insights from Rural Areas. Atmosphere, 14(8): 1–14. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/8/1194
  35. Kumar., et al. (2018). Socio-Sentic Framework for Sustainable Agricultural Governance. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28(1), 1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2018.08.006
  36. Kyalo., et al. (2019). Can Economic And Environmental Benefits Associated With Agricultural Intensification Be Sustained At High Population Densities? A Farm Level Empirical Analysis. Land Use Policy, 81(10), 100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.046
  37. Lambrecht., et al. (2024). It Doesn’t Matter at All—We Are Family’: Titling and Joint Property Rights in Myanmar. Land Use Policy, 139(10), 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107089
  38. Lamefa., et al. (2020). Strategy For The Development Of Coffee Agroindustry In Kerinci Regency. Jurnal AIP, 8(2), 85–98. doi: 10.25181/jaip.v8i2.1480
  39. Li., et al. (2023). Moderate Operation Scales of Agricultural Land under the Greenhouse and Open-Field Production Modes Based on DEA Model in Mountainous Areas of Southwest China. Heliyon, 9(11), 10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21290.
  40. Lubis., et al. (2020). Sistem Pemasaran Salak Di Tiga Juhar Farm Desa Rumah Sumbul Kecamatan Tiga Juhar Kabuppaten Deli Serdang Sumatera Utara. Wahana Inovasi, 9(2), 154–61. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uisu.ac.id/index.php/wahana/article/view/3589
  41. Maldayo., et al. (2024). Determinants of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Usage to Achieve SDGs: Misrak Badawacho District, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15(1), 1-15. doi :10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100912
  42. Martial ,T ., & Asaad, M. (2014). Developing Concept of Custumary Based Tree Tenure in North Sumatera Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Sustainable Agriculture Food and Energy (APJSAFE), 2(3), 27–35. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322924094_Asia_Pacific_Journal_of_Sustainable_Agriculture_Food_and_Energy_APJSAFE_Developing_Concept_of_Custumary_based_tree_tenure_in_North_Sumatera_Indonesia
  43. Martial, T., Mhd A., & Indra, G. (2020). The Role of Various Social Economic Variables to Support Sustainable Practices: Study in the Smallholder Rubber Plantations in North Sumatera. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 1614–18. Retrieved from http://www.ijstr.org/final-print/feb2020/The-Role-Of-Various-Social-Economic-Variables-To-Support-Sustainable-Practices-Study-In-The-Smallholder-Rubber-Plantations-In-North-Sumatera.pdf
  44. Mosallanezhad, B., et al. (2023). Metaheuristic Optimizers to Solve Multi-Echelon Sustainable Fresh Seafood Supply Chain Network Design Problem: A Case of Shrimp Products. Alexandria Engineering Journal 68(1), 491–515. Doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.01.022
  45. Nirmala, B., & Hardjanto, A. (2022). Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Kopi Robusta di Desa Purwabakti Kecamatan Pamijahan Kabupaten Bogor. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Resource and Environmental Economics, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29244/ijaree.v1i1.40137 Retrieved from https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ijaree/article/view/40137
  46. Nurhayati, N. (2020). Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.) Di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat. Rawa Sains: Jurnal Sains Stiper Amuntai, 10(1): 45–57. doi: 10.36589/rs.v10i1.117
  47. Olutumise., et al. (2024). Unlocking Sustainable Agriculture: Climate Adaptation, Opportunity Costs, and Net Revenue for Nigeria Cassava Farmers. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). 15-29. doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00249-8
  48. Paloma., et al. (2020). Pengaruh Aksesibilitas Pembiayaan Terhadap Pendapatan Petani Kopi Di Lembah Gumanti, Kabupaten Solok. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis 19(2): 301–14. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.19.2.301-314
  49. Petrescu-Mag., et al. (2024). Causes And Solutions For Fruit And Vegetable Waste: A Participatory Approach With Romanian Farmers For Sustainable Agriculture. International Journal Of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2329391
  50. Rahmawati. (2014). Analisis Efisiensi, Profitabilitas, Kesehatan BUS Di Indonesia Periode 2010 - 2013. Jurnal Ilmu Ekon Islam, 4(3), 207–227. Retrieved from https://journal.perbanas.id/index.php/jkp/article/download/196/20/220
  51. Rahmi, A., et al. 2022. Strategi Peningkatan Daya Saing Pengembangan Agribisnis Kopi Di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Riset Perkebunan, 3(1), 18–26. doi: 10.25077/jrp.3.1.18-26.2022
  52. Ramadhani. (2011). Analisis Efisiensi, Skala Dan Elastisitas Produksi Dengan Pendekatan Cobb-Douglas Dan Regresi Berganda.” Jurnal Teknologi, 4(1), 61–68. Retrieved from https://ejournal.akprind.ac.id/index.php/jurtek/article/view/868
  53. Santiasih, et al. (2021). Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Jagung Anggota Dan Non-Anggota Kelompok Tani Di Kecamatan Marga Tiga Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agribisnis, 9(2), 130-142. doi: 10.23960/jiia.v9i1.4965
  54. Sari. (2018). Analisis Keuntungan Dan Efisiensi Penggunaan Biaya Usahatani Kopi Rakyat Robusta Di Kecamatan Sumber Wringin Kabupaten Bondowoso. Agribest 2(01): 61–69. doi: 10.32528/agribest.v2i1.1380
  55. Sarmo, S., Darwini, S., & Andilolo, I. R. (2021). Diversifikasi Produk Dan Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Kopi Product Diversification And Calculation Of Coffee Production Cost. Buletin Swimp, 1(2), 77-83. Retrieved from https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=3401129&val=29845&title=The%20DIVERSIFIKASI%20PRODUK%20DAN%20PERHITUNGAN%20HARGA%20POKOK%20PRODUKSI%20KOPI
  56. Sasrido, M., Tanjung, F., & Mutiara, V. I. (2022). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Gambir di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Menggunakan Model Kumbhakar. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(3), 2207-2215. doi: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2711
  57. Slovin, M. J. (1960). Sampling. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc
  58. Sudiawan, R., Dasipah, E., & Sukmawati, D. (2022). Analisis Efisiensi Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Hasil Produksi Usahatani Padi Organik Di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 8(2): 848–65. doi: 10.25157/ma.v8i2.7343
  59. Sugiyono. (2019). Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA
  60. Sularso, et al., (2019). Efisiensi Alokatif Usahatani Padi Organik Lahan Sawah Di Kabupaten Banyumas. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics) 12(3), 1-10. doi: 10.19184/jsep.v12i03.14303
  61. Sumarno, J., Anasiru, R. H., & Retnawati, E. (2020). Sugarcane farm efficiency in Gorontalo Province. J. Penelit. Tanam. Ind. Littri, 26(11). 1-19. doi: 10.21776/ub.habitat.2021.032.2.11
  62. Suprianto & Sarifudin. (2020). Analisis Efisiensi Dan Nilai Tambah Produk Agroindustri Olahan Kerupuk Kulit Sapi (Studi Kasus Di Seganteng Kota Mataram). Journal of Economics and Business, 6(2), 114–33. doi: 10.29303/ekonobis.v6i2.51
  63. Suprianto, S,, & Indah M. (2022). Analisis Efektivitas Dan Efisiensi Pemungutan Retribusi Pasar Di Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 10(3), 322–331. Retrieved from https://e-journallppmunsa.ac.id/index.php/jeb/article/view/1043/1023
  64. Suwanmaneepong, S., et al. (2020). Cost and Return Analysis of Organic and Conventional Rice Production in Chachoengsao Province, Thailand. Organic Agriculture, 10(1), 369–378. doi: 10.1007/s13165-020-00280-9
  65. Tamirat, Negese, & Sanait. (2023). Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Coffee Production in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9(4), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15030
  66. Tokbergenova., et al. (2018). Sustainable Development Agriculture In The Republic Of Kazakhstan. Polish Journal Of Environmental Studies, 27(5), 1923–1933. Retrieved from https://www.pjoes.com/Sustainable-Development-Agriculture-nin-the-Republic-of-Kazakhstan,78617,0,2.html
  67. Toledo-Aceves., et al. (2013). Benefits and Costs of Epiphyte Management in Shade Coffee Plantations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 181(1), 149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.026
  68. Toruan, G.L. (2013). Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Mandailing Natal Dalam Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Batang Gadis, Sumatera Utara Kearifan Lokal. Retrieved from http://gunsalt.blogspot.com/2013/01/kearifan-lokal-masyarakat-hukum-adat.html.
  69. Widaningrum, I., & Aji, J. M. M. (2023). Efisiensi Alokatif Penggunaan Faktor Produksi pada Usahatani Cengkeh di Desa Sawahan Kecamatan Sawahan Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa AGROINFO GALUH, 10(2), 1235-1249. doi: 10.25157/jimag.v10i2.9857
  70. WIjaya, I. M. W., Juliawan, I. P. G. A., & Yastika, P. E. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Dan Pemasaran Bibit Tanaman Budidaya Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19. In Prosiding Seminar Regional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. 1(1), 1-6. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/Prosemreg/article/view/3213/2516
  71. Winarso, R. H., Syafrial, S., & Widyawati, W. (2021). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Multi-Stage Menggunakan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) dan Regresi Tobit pada Usahatani Bawang Merah, Studi Kasus di Desa Torongrejo, Kecamatan Junrejo, Kota Batu, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 5(4), 1191-1205. doi: 10.21776/ub.jepa.2021.005.04.21
  72. Yusuf, et al. (2022). Sustainability of Arabica Coffee Business in West Java, Indonesia: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach. Open Agriculture, 7(1), 820–36. doi: 10.1515/opag-2022-0144
  73. Zamhari, A., Utama, S. P., & Mersyah, R. (2019). Ekonomi Konversi Lahan Sawah Menjadi Kebun Kelapa Sawit Di Kecamatan Kedurang Kabupaten Bengkulu Selatan Provinsi Bengkulu. Naturalis: Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 8(1), 1-8. doi: 10.31186/naturalis.8.1.9156
  74. Zen, F., & Budiasih, B. (2019). Produktivitas dan Efisiensi Teknis Usaha Perkebunan Kopi di Sumatera Selatan dan Lampung. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 18(3), 5-18. doi: 10.21002/jepi.2018.16
  75. Zeweld, et al. (2019). Sustainable Agricultural Practices, Environmental Risk Mitigation and Livelihood Improvements: Empirical Evidence from Northern Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 95(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.002