Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 28, 2024
Accepted
February 12, 2025
Published
March 8, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 77 Download : 47

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes consumer preferences and Willingness to Pay (WTP) for organic broiler chicken in the Jabodetabek area. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) method analyzes consumer preferences and WTP based on relevant attributes that are in the market or similar to those in the market. The attributes analyzed were organic label, product form, freshness, taste, and price. These five attributes were selected based on a literature review. The study was conducted on 105 respondents who had experience buying and consuming it. Data were collected online from September to October 2024. The results showed that consumers prefer organic broiler chicken with organic labels, cuts/parts, fresh, and tasty. Conversely, high prices can decrease consumers' utility. Consumers are willing to pay IDR Rp96,883/kg more for organic broilers with organic labels, IDR 22,516/kg for cuts/parts, IDR 34,101/kg for fresh, and IDR 70,634/kg for tasty. This study emphasizes the importance of organic certification in increasing consumer confidence and the provision of organic broilers in practical and fresh forms. Producers and marketers are advised to prioritize product quality and convenience and develop marketing strategies highlighting the superior taste and health benefits of this product.

Keywords

discrete choice experiment organic broiler chicken preference willingness to pay

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Melysa Nabilasari, Harmini, Yanti Nuraeni Muflikh

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Nabilasari, M., Harmini, & Muflikh, Y. N. (2025). Consumer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Organic Broiler Chicken in Jabodetabek. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 24(01), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.24.01.231-250
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aliansi Organis Indonesia. (2020). Statistik Pertanian Organik Indonesia 2019. Bogor: Aliansi Organis Indonesia
  2. Amudha, K., & Thaiyalnayaki, M. (2024). Consumer Involvement And Purchase Pattern Of Organic Food Products In Chennai City. Educational Administration Theory And Practices, 30(1), 687–694. doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.5253
  3. Asante, C., & Weible, D. (2019). Is There Hope for Domestically Produced Poultrymeat? A Choice Experiment of Consumers in Ghana. Agribusiness, 36(2), 281–298. doi: 10.1002/agr.21626
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Penggolongan Pendapatan Penduduk. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik
  5. Bi, X., Gao, Z., House, L. A., & Hausmann, D. S. (2015). Tradeoffs Between Sensory Attributes And Organic Labels: The Case Of Orange Juice. International Journal Of Consumer Studies, 39(2), 162–171. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12164
  6. Cobanoglu, F., Kucukyilmaz, K., Cinar, M., Bozkurt, M., Catli, A. U., & Bintas, E. (2014). Comparing The Profitability Of Organic And Conventional Broiler Production. Brazilian Journal Of Poultry Science, 16(4), 403–410. doi: 10.1590/1516-635x1604403-410
  7. Costa, J., Morgado, C., Fernandes, A., Guerra, M., & Brandao, C. (2019). Profile And Motivations Of Consumers Of Organic Products. Proceedings Of The 2nd International Congress On Engineering And Sustainability In The XXI Century, 174–183. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30938-1_14
  8. Databoks. (2024). Konsumsi Daging Ayam Per Kapita Indonesia Meningkat Pada 2023. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/04/22/konsumsi-daging-ayam-per-kapita-indonesia-meningkat-pada-2023
  9. Departemen Kesehatan RI. (2009). Klasifikasi Umur Menurut Kategori. Jakarta: Ditjen Yankes
  10. Dewi, W. W. A., & Syauki, W. R. (2023). Green Awareness Of Female Consumers Towards Sustainable Products In Indonesia. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 13(1), 129–139. doi: 10.29244/jpsl.13.1.129-139
  11. Fedorova, Z. L., Vakhrameev, A. B., & Makarova, A. V. (2023). The Prospect of Using Chicken Breeds of The Combined Type of Productivity In Organic Poultry Farming. Agrarian Science, 8155(12), 51–56. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2022-365-12-51-56
  12. Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. (2021). On Linking Socioeconomic Status To Consumer Willingness To Buy And Pay For Organic Food. Journal Of Food Science And Technology, 58(3), 1042–1050. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04618-9
  13. Hasanin, F., Maghraby, O., & Mostafa, A. (2015). Fractionation Of Amino Acids And Fatty Acids Of Fresh Local And Frozen Imported Chicken Meat. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 29(2), 17–22. doi: 10.21608/bvmj.2015.31540
  14. Indrawan, D., Christy, A., & Hogeveen, H. (2021). Improving Poultry Meat And Sales Channels To Address Food Safety Concerns: Consumers’ Preferences On Poultry Meat Attributes. British Food Journal, 123(13), 529–546. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0362
  15. Jayasathya, R., & Rekha, G. (2018). A Study On Consumer’s Preference And Purchase Intention Towards Organic Poultry. International Journal Of Applied Research, 4(3), 308–311. Retrieved from https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2018/vol4issue3/PartE/4-3-27-488.pdf
  16. Jozias, V., Timisela, N. R., & Lawalata, M. (2020). Analisis Segmentasi Pasar Sayuran Organik Di Pulau Saparua Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 17(1), 72–82. doi: 10.20961/sepa.v17i1.42910
  17. Klemeshova, I. Y., Reimer, V. A., Tarabanova, E. V., & Alekseeva, Z. N. (2021). Theoretical Basis of Obtaining Poultry Products of Organic Status. Bulletin Of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University), 2(1), 125–131. doi: 10.31677/2072-6724-2021-59-2-125-131
  18. Kwadzo, G., Dadzie, F., Osei-Asare, Y., & Kuwornu, J. K. M. (2013). Consumer Preference For Broiler Meat In Ghana: A Conjoint Analysis Approach. International Journal Of Marketing Studies, 5(2), 66–73. doi: 10.5539/ijms.v5n2p66
  19. Liu, C., Liu, X., Yao, L., & Liu, J. (2023). Consumer Preferences And Willingness To Pay For Eco-Labelled Eggs: A Discrete Choice Experiment From Chongqing In China. British Food Journal, 125(5), 1683–1697. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-12-2021-1305
  20. Lizin, S., Rousseau, S., Kessels, R., Meulders, M., Pepermans, G., Speelman, S., Vandebroek, M., Van Den Broeck, G., Van Loo, E. J., & Verbeke, W. (2022). The State Of The Art Of Discrete Choice Experiments In Food Research. Food Quality And Preference, 102(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104678
  21. Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., & Carson, R. T. (2010). Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis. Journal Of Choice Modelling, 3(3), 57–72. doi: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9
  22. Ludwig-Borycz, E., Guyer, H. M., Aljahdali, A. A., & Baylin, A. (2021). Organic Food Consumption Is Associated With Inflammatory Biomarkers Among Older Adults. Public Health Nutrition, 24(14), 4603–4613. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005236
  23. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis Of Qualitative Choice Behavior. New York: Academic Press
  24. Michel, L. M., Anders, S., & Wismer, W. V. (2011). Consumer Preferences And Willingness To Pay For Value-Added Chicken Product Attributes. Journal Of Food Science, 76(8), 5469–5477. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x
  25. Mitic, V. C., & Colovic, M. M. (2022). The Basic Features Of Typical Consumers Of Organic Food. Journal Of Agricultural Sciences (Belgrade), 67(4), 433–452. doi: 10.2298/JAS2204433M
  26. Molee, W., Khosinklang, W., Tongduang, P., Thumanu, K., Yongsawatdigul, J., & Molee, A. (2022). Biomolecules, Fatty Acids, Meat Quality, And Growth Performance Of Slow-Growing Chickens In An Organic Raising System. Animals, 12(5), 1–20. doi: 10.3390/ani12050570
  27. Ningrum, A. P. T., Saty, F. M., & Zaini, M. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pembelian Ayam Organik Di Provinsi Lampung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Dan Pendidikan Vokasi Pertanian, 3(1), 237–248. doi: 10.47687/snppvp.v3i1.309
  28. Ofuoku, A. U., & Akusu, M. O. (2016). Preference And Willingness Of Consumers To Pay For Value-Added Poultry Products In Niger Delta Region Of Nigeria. Journal Of Northeast Agricultural University (English Edition), 23(4), 82–92. doi: 10.1016/s1006-8104(17)30011-9
  29. Orme, B. K. (2010). Getting Started Getting With Conjoint Analysi Strategies For Product Design And Pricing Research (2 ed.). Madison: Research Publishers LLC
  30. Priyambodo, C. S., Sastryawanto, H., & Hermawati, D. T. (2019). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Buah Jeruk Di Pasar Keputran Utara, Surabaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio Agribis, 19(1), 85–103. Retrieved from https://journal.uwks.ac.id/index.php/sosioagribis/article/view/690
  31. Probowati, D. D., Supardi, S., & Marwanti, S. (2016). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Dan Strategi Pemasaran Buah Jeruk Keprok Di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 12(2), 120–132. doi: 10.20961/sepa.v12i2.14402
  32. Pujiastuti, R. R. B. C., Hadi, S., & Yusri, J. (2023). Analisis Kesediaan Membayar Ayam Organik Mentah Produksi UD. Rahayu AK Kota Pekanbaru Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 10(1), 680–696. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/agroinfogaluh/article/view/9304
  33. Ragasa, C., Andam, K. ., Amewu, S., & Asante, S. B. (2019). Consumer Demand And Willingness To Pay For Safe Food In Accra, Ghana Implications For Public And Private Sectors’ Roles In Food Safety Management. Social Science Research Network, 1(1), 1–38. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36693.88805
  34. Ragavan, N., & Mageh, R. (2013). A Study on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Towards Organic Products. Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research, 2(1), 111–114. doi: 10.15373/22501991/jan2013/41
  35. Ristanti, E. W., Kismiati, S., & Harjanti, D. W. (2017). Pengaruh Lama Pemaparan Pada Suhu Ruang Terhadap Total Bakteri, PH dan Kandungan Protein Daging Ayam Di Pasar Tradisional Kabupaten Semarang. AGROMEDIA: Berkala Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian, 35(1), 50–57. doi: 10.47728/ag.v35i1.192
  36. Shaba, S. M., Choi, S. H., & Chung, W. H. (2018). Consumers’ Perceptions and Valuation Of An Organic Chicken In Malawi. Korean Journal Of Organic Agricultue, 26(1), 19–31. doi: 10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.1.19
  37. Shin, D. J., Jo, C., Kim, D., Jung, Y., Lee, J. H., Nam, K. C., Choo, H.-J., & Jang, A. (2023). Taste-Related And Volatile Organic Compounds Of Fresh And Frozen–Thawed Chicken Breast Meat. Journal Of Animal Science And Technology, 66(6), 1221-1236 doi: 10.5187/jast.2023.e125
  38. Singhal, N. (2017). A Study Of Consumer Behavior Towards Organic Food And The Moderating Effects Of Health Consciousness. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 16(3), 45–79. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215699
  39. Siva, E., & Chandrachud, S. (2022). Organic Farm Products And Socio Demography: A Study Special Reference With Tiruvannamalai District. International Journal Of Health Sciences, 6(51), 4922–4930. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6ns1.5944
  40. Tan, K. G., Merdikawati, N., Amri, M., & Tan, K. Y. (2016). Analisis Daya Saing Provinsi dan Wilayah Menjaga Momentum Pertumbuhan Indonesia Edisi 2014. Singapura: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd
  41. Thuannadee, A., & Noosuwan, C. (2023). Consumer Meat Preference And Willingness To Pay For Local Organic Meat In Thailand: A Case Study Of Taphao Thong-Kasetsart Chicken. Journal Of Agribusiness In Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(2), 1-16. doi: 10.1108/JADEE-12-2022-0279
  42. Train, K. E. (2014). Discrete Choice Methods With Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  43. Van Loo, E. J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R. M., Meullenet, J. F., & Ricke, S. C. (2011). Consumers’ Willingness to Pay For Organic Chicken Breast: Evidence From Choice Experiment. Food Quality And Preference, 22(7), 603–613. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.003
  44. Wang, Q. J., Dalsgard, J., & Giacalone, D. (2022). Shopping For A Sustainable Future: Two Case Studies On Consumer Perception Of Organic Cotton And Wine. Food Quality And Preference, 96(2), 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104405
  45. Yilmaz, B. (2023). Factors Influencing Consumers’ Behaviour towards Purchasing Organic Foods: A Theoretical Model. Sustainability, 15(20), 1–17. doi: 10.3390/su152014895
  46. Yulianti, Y., & Deliana, Y. (2018). Gaya Hidup Kaitannya dengan Keputusan Konsumen dalam Membeli Minuman Kopi. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 17(1), 39–50. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.17.1.39-50
  47. Yusnita, M. (2010). Pola Perilaku Konsumen dan Produsen. Semarang: Balai Pustaka