Main Article Content

Abstract

This study departs from the observation of the use of digital applications in village forest management, where women are more active in data collection and communication, reflecting the beginning of gender role transformation in village forest management in Kuala Indragiri Sub-district, Indragiri Hilir District. It investigates how digitalization affects women’s participation in village forest management institutions (VFMI) and how sociocultural norms shape the gender digital divide. Using a mixed-methods case study in two mangrove coastal villages - Sapat and Sungai Piyai Village - the research combines surveys, in-depth interviews, participant observation, meaning that the higher the gender digital divide, the lower the role of women in institutions. Men dominating technical applications such as Avenza Maps (mapping), while women limited to administrative or communication tools WhatsApp and KoboToolbox (online surveys). Although limited, women's involvement in training and the use of digital applications is beginning to open space for recognition of their strategic role in village forest governance, reflecting the potential for gender transformation. Affirmative and intersectional strategies are needed, to minimize the reproduction of existing gender gaps. This study contributes to the discourse on inclusive digital transformation by highlighting the importance of overcoming structural and cultural barriers in social forestry programs. The findings also have the potential to be replicated in other coastal communities that face similar challenges in digitalization and gender inequality.

Keywords

Gender Digital Divide Digitalization Forest Management Gender Role Transformmation Village Institutions

Article Details

How to Cite
Herna, H., Kolopaking, L. M., & Hapsari, D. R. (2026). Gender Role Transformation in Village Forest Management Through Digital Applications: a Case Study of Village Forest Management Institution. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 25(01), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.25.01.143-168

References

  1. Acilar, A., & Sæbø, Ø. (2023). Towards Understanding the Gender Digital Divide: a Systematic Literature Review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 72(3), 233–249. DOI: 10.1108/GKMC-09-2021-0147
  2. Anam, K., M Kolopaking, L., & A Kinseng, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of Social Media Usage within Social Movement to Reject the Reclamation of the Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 8(1), 64–81. DOI: 10.22500/8202028955
  3. Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The Gender Digital Divide in Developing Countries. Future Internet. 6(4), 673–687. DOI: 10.3390/fi6040673.
  4. Anugrah, D., Muin, A. V. F., Irlan, I., Tomasina, M. A., Azila, N., Sirimorok, N., Dungga, N. E., & Alam, S. (2022). Injustice against Women in a Social Forestry Program: Case Studies from Two Indonesian Villages. Forest and Society, 6(2), 723–741. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v6i2.20006
  5. Aristoteles, A., Safe’I, R., Syarif, A., Muludi, K., Lumbanraja, F.R. (2022). Pendamping Pengembangan E-Commerce di KWTH Kartini, Desa Kubu Batu, Kabupaten Pesawaran Pada Era Digitalisasi Dalam Peningkatan Ekonomi Masyarakat. Buguh Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 2(3), 45-60. DOI: 10.23960/buguh.v2n3.1173.
  6. Arwida, S. D., Maharani, C. D., Basnett, B. S., & Yang, A. L. (2017). Gender Relevant Considerations for Developing REDD+ Indicators: Lessons Learned for Indonesia. Gender Relevant Considerations for Developing REDD+ Indicators: Lessons Learned for Indonesia, 168(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006398
  7. Asaniyah, N. (2017). Pelestarian Informasi Koleksi Langka: Digitalisasi, Restorasi, Fumigasi. Buletin Perpustakaan, 57(1), 85–94. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/Buletin-Perpustakaan/article/view/9105
  8. Begum, F., Lobry de Bruyn, L., Kristiansen, P., & Islam, M. A. (2022). Forest Co-Management in the Sundarban Mangrove Forest: Impacts of Women’s Participation on Their Livelihoods and Sustainable Forest Resource Conservation. Environmental Development, 43(1), 100731-100748. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100731
  9. Beneito-Montagut, R., Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2022). Emerging Digital Inequalities: A Comparative Study of Older Adults’ Smartphone Use. Social Media and Society, 8(4), 90-115. DOI: 10.1177/20563051221138756
  10. Bergstén, S., Andersson, E., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2020). Same-Same but Different: Gendering Forest Ownership in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 115(1), 102162-102183. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102162
  11. Bitzer, V., Moździerz, M., Kuijpers, R., Schouten, G., & Juju, D. B. (2024). Gender and Forest Resources in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Literature Review. Forest Policy and Economics, 163(1), 103226-103242. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103226.
  12. Bokonda PL, Ouazzani-Touhami K, Souissi N. (2020). A Practical Analysis of Mobile Data Collection Apps. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM),14(13), 9-18. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v14i13.13483
  13. Bonett, D. G., & Wright, T. A. (2000). Sample Size Requirements for Estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman Correlations. Psychometrika, 65(1), 23–28. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294183
  14. Bryan, E., Alvi, M., Huyer, S., & Ringler, C. (2024). Addressing Gender Inequalities and Strengthening Women’s Agency to Create more Climate-Resilient and Sustainable Food Systems. Global Food Security, 40(5), 100731-100749. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100731
  15. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1265. DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  16. Creswell, J. W. ., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. SAGE
  17. Creswell, J. W. ., & Poth, C. N. . (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. SAGE
  18. Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of Normality Tests in Terms of Sample Sizes under Different Skewness and Kurtosis Coefficients. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397–409. DOI: 10.21449/ijate.1101295
  19. Denwood, T., Huck, J. J., & Lindley, S. (2023). Paper2GIS: Improving Accessibility Without Limiting Analytical Potential in Participatory Mapping. Journal of Geographical Systems, 25(1), 37–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10109-022-00386-6
  20. Dewi, K. H., Raharjo, S. N. I., Desmiwati, Hendarto, K. A., Aminah, A., Wisudayati, T. A., Royani, H., Hasibuan, A. D. S., & Sari, D. R. (2020). Roles and Voices of Farmers in the “Special Purpose” Forest Area in Indonesia: Strengthening Gender Responsive Policy. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 26(4), 444–465. DOI: 10.1080/12259276.2020.1844972
  21. D’Ignazio Catherine, Klein LF. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press
  22. Elianur, C. (2017). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi WhatsApp Sebagai Diskusi Antar Pengawas dan Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam. As-Salam, 1(2), 1–14. Retrieved from https://www.jurnal-assalam.org/index.php/JAS/article/view/80
  23. Elias, M., Jalonen, R., Fernandez, M., & Grosse, A. (2017). Gender-Responsive Participatory Research for Social Learning and Sustainable Forest Management. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 26(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2016.1247753
  24. Elliott, T. M., Reed, M. G., & Fletcher, A. J. (2023). Learning from Wildfire: Co-Creating Knowledge Using an Intersectional Feminist Standpoint Methodology. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(6), 1249598-1249612. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1249598
  25. Fajar I. (2021). Kesenjangan Digital Tingkat Ketiga pada Pemuda Pedesaan di Kabupaten Cianjur, Indonesia. Jurnal Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi, Media dan Informatika. 10(1):44. DOI: 10.31504/komunika.v10i1.4260.
  26. Gabrys, J. (2022). The Forest That Walks: Digital Fieldwork and Distributions of Site. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(2), 228–235. DOI: 10.1177/10778004211042356
  27. Gabrys, J., Westerlaken, M., Urzedo, D., Ritts, M., & Simlai, T. (2022). Reworking the political in digital forests: The cosmopolitics of socio-technical worlds. Progress in Environmental Geography, 1(1–4), 58–83. DOI: 10.1177/27539687221117836
  28. Genz, S., & Schnabel, C. (2023). Digitalization is not Gender-Neutral. Economics Letters, 230(8), 111256-111267. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111256
  29. Hafkin, N. J., & Huyer, S. (2008). Women and Gender in ICT Statistics and Indicators for Development. Information Technologies and International Development, 4(2), 25–41. DOI: 10.1162/itid.2008.00006
  30. Heeks R. (2022). Digital Inequality Beyond the Digital Divide: Conceptualizing Adverse Digital Incorporation in the Global South. Inf Technol Dev, 28(4), 688–704. DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2022.2068492.
  31. Henriksen, L. F., Kamnde, K., Silvano, P., Olwig, M. F., Mwamfupe, A., & Gallemore, C. (2023). Strong Collaborative Governance Networks Support Effective Forest Stewardship Council-Certified Community-Based Forest Management: Evidence from Southeast Tanzania. Global Environmental Change, 82(3) 102734-102754. DOI: 1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102734
  32. Hidrobo, M., Kosec, K., Gartaula, H. N., Van Campenhout, B., & Carrillo, L. (2024). Making Complementary Agricultural Resources, Technologies, and Services more Gender-Responsive. Global Food Security, 42(2), 100778-100786. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100778
  33. Isabella, I., Iriyani, A., Lestari, P., D. (2023). Literasi Digital sebagai Upaya Membangun Karakter Masyarakat Digital. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik. 8(3), 167–172. DOI: 10.36982/jpg.v8i3.3236.
  34. Jahel, C., Bourgeois, R., Bourgoin, J., Daré, W., De Lattre-Gasquet, M., Delay, E., Dumas, P., Le Page, C., Piraux, M., & Prudhomme, R. (2023). The Future of Social-Ecological Systems at the Crossroads of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193(3), 122624-122638. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122624
  35. Juwita, R., Rahayu, D., Rohmah, A. N., & Pawae, R. D. (2024). Unlocking Women’s Empowerment towards Digital Inclusivity in East Kalimantan through Digital Competence Evaluation. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 27(3), 260–276. DOI: 10.22146/jsp.78163
  36. Kadel, L. M., Chitale, V. S., & Gurung, K. (2022). Integrating Gender Into Data Services: A Flexible, Multidisciplinary and Reflexive Approach. Frontiers in Climate, 4(3), 1-14. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2022.736200
  37. Linao, P. A., Heimtun, B., & Morgan, N. (2024). Digital Nomadism, Gender and Racial Power Relations. Annals of Tourism Research, 106(3), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2024.103770
  38. Lindgren S. 2017. Simon Lindgren - Digital Media and Society. SAGE
  39. Long, T. Q., Hoang, T. C., & Simkins, B. (2023). Gender Gap in Digital Literacy Across Generations: Evidence from Indonesia. Finance Research Letters, 58(2), 104588-104600. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104588
  40. Maukonen, P., Donn, P., & Snook, L. K. (2020). Addressing Potential Conflict Using Participatory Mapping: Collection of Forest Foods From Timber Trees Around Industrial Concessions in Cameroon. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3(1),1-18. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00072
  41. Morag, I., & Parush, A. (2024). The Effect of Verbal Instructions While Using Digital Indoor Wayfinding Devices on Gender, Performance, and Self-Reported Strategies. Applied Ergonomics, 114(2), 104160-104174. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104160
  42. Nelson, I. L., Hawkins, R., & Govia, L. (2023). Feminist digital natures. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(3), 2096–2109. DOI: 10.1177/25148486221123136
  43. Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson
  44. Ortner SB. (2005). Subjectivity and Cultural Critique. Anthropological Theory. 5(1):31–52. DOI: 10.1177/1463499605050867
  45. Orton J., K., & Prior N. (2013). Digital Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan
  46. Pandya, R. (2023). an Intersectional Approach to Neoliberal Environmentality: Women’s Engagement with Ecotourism at Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(1), 355–372. DOI: 10.1177/25148486221082469
  47. Puspitasari, L., & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital Divides and Mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of Smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 472–483. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.001
  48. Rohmy, A. M., & Nihayaty, A. I. (2023). Green Economy Policies in the Digital Transformation of Forest Management in Indonesia. Environmental Policy and Law, 53(4), 289–302. DOI: 10.3233/EPL-230026
  49. Ruiz, A. P., Martínez, A. C., Toledano, E. G., & Parra, E. L. (2021). Digital Gender Gap in University Education in Spain. Study of a Case for Paired Samples. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(3), 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121096
  50. Suwarti, Soeaidy, M. S., & Suryadi. (2015). Implementasi Perencanaan Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Hutan Desa di Kabupaten Gunungkidul. Unitri, 5(1), 195-203. DOI: 10.33366/rfr.v5i1.67
  51. Togubu, I. F., Nurdin, A. S., & Salatalohy, A. (2022). Analisis Gender Dalam Kehiatan Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat di Kecamatan Malifut di Kabupaten Halmahera Utara. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 5(2), 5063–5070. DOI: 10.47492/jip.v3i2.1772
  52. Turyahikayo, E. (2021). Philosophical paradigms as the bases for knowledge management research and practice. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 13(02), 209–224. DOI: 10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.012
  53. Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). Digital Divide Research, Achievements and Shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. DOI: 1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004
  54. Wahyudi, D., & Kurniasih, N. (2022). Cyberfeminism dan Isu Gender dalam Arus Teknopolitik Modern. SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 4(01), 25-39. DOI: 10.32332/jsga.v4i01.4523
  55. Wajcman, J. (2004). Techno Feminism. Polity Press
  56. Wijoyo, H., Vensuri, H., Widiyanti, Sunarsi, D., Haudi, Dodi, Prasada, Kristianti, L. S., Lutfi, A.M., Akbar, I.R. (2020). Digitalisasi UMKM. Solok: Insan Cendekia Mandiri
  57. Widiono, S., Wahyuni, E. S., Kolopaking, L. M., & Satria, A. (2024). Livelihood Vulnerability of Indigenous People to Climate Change Around the Kerinci Seblat National Park in Bengkulu, Indonesia. Regional Sustainability, 5(4), 16-28. Doi: 10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100181
  58. Xiang, H., Xi, Y., Mao, D., Mahdianpari, M., Zhang, J., Wang, M., Jia, M., Yu, F., & Wang, Z. (2023). Mapping Potential Wetlands by a New Framework Method Using Random Forest Algorithm and Big Earth Data: a Case Study in China’s Yangtze River Basin. Global Ecology and Conservation, 42 (3), 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02397
  59. Xiong, Y., Dai, Z., Long, C., Liang, X., Lou, Y., Mei, X., Nguyen, B. A., & Cheng, J. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Examination of Recent Mangrove Forest Changes in the Western Irrawaddy River Delta, Southeast Asia. CATENA, 234(5), 107601-107623. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107601
  60. Yuliani, F. (2014). KetidaKadilan Gender dalam PembanGunan Pertanian: Studi Pandangan Politik Perempuan anggota legislatif di Kabupaten Kudus. PALASTREN, 7(2), 419–440. DOI: 10.21043/palastren.v7i2.1030
  61. Yuliati, Y., Cahyono, E. D., Maulana, R., & Arissaryadin. (2024). Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program. Gender, Technology and Development, 28(1), 153–177. DOI: 10.1080/09718524.2023.2260654
  62. Yunaningsih A, Indah D, Eryanto Septiawan F. (2021). Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Layanan Publik Melalui Digitalisasi. Altasia : Jurnal Pariwisata Indonesia. 3(1), 9–16. DOI: 10.37253/altasia.v3i1.4336.
  63. Zahra, A., Markum, & Wulandari, F. T. (2024). Analisis Peran Gender dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Desa Aik Bual Kecamatan Kopang Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika, 5(3), 329–336. DOI: 10.29303/geoscienceed.v5i3.342
  64. Zahriyah, A., Suprianik, M. S., Si, M., Parmono, A., & Mustofa, M. S. (2021). EKONOMETRIKA Tekhnik dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Mandala Press