Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 9, 2015
Accepted
September 9, 2015
Published
April 10, 2011
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 118 Download : 131

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was aimed at explaining  one of the conflicts in Lampung Province who developed into a peasant movement.  Interestingly, this peasant movement overran the land and agrarian policy influence to form a new village. Data were obtained from depth interviews and documentary studies. The results found that the structural pressures led to the accumulation of land conflicts crystallize into "sub-culture of peasant opposition." Its social and cultural capital were a base to accelerate the strengthening of peasants' resource mobilization. The momentum of the political opportunities at the beginning of reform responded quickly to the socio-political movements in the form of protests, negotiations and land occupation. Through this movement, the farmers has managed to occupy agricultural land, the agrarian policy changes that benefit farmers and obtained the legality of the formation of a new village Karang Rejo. However, behind this success, the substantive isues of peasants to land ownership was still neglected, so that the struggle of peasants were still not finished.

Keywords

land conflict peasant movement movement outcome

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Hartoyo, H. (2011). TEKANAN STRUKTURAL, PELUANG POLITIK, DAN SUKSES GERAKAN PETANI DI LAMPUNG. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 10(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.10.1.80-93
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Barkan, Steven. E., and Snowden, Lynne. L. 2001. Collective Violence. Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Bartos, J.O., and Wehr, P. 2003. Using Conflict Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Dubet, F., dan Thaler, H.L. 2004. Introduction: The Sociology of Collective Action Reconsidered. Corrent Sociology, July 2004, Vol. 52(4): 557-573 SAGE Publications. Download dari www.sagepublications.com.
  4. Eckstein S (ed). 1989. Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movement. Berkeley: University of California Press. Friatna, Mukri. 2009. Sumsel Urutan Ketujuh Konflik Tanah. Kompas. Com, Senin, 16 Nopember 2009. Dinduh dari http://regional.kompas.com/read/2009/11/16/1607387/sumsel.urutan. ketujuh. konflik.tanah.
  5. Gurr, Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. New Jersey: Princenton University Press.
  6. Hjlmar, Ulf. 1996. Constructivist Analysis and Movement Organizations: Conceptual Clarifications. Acta Sociologica 1996 Vol. 39, pp. 169-186.
  7. Johnston H dan Klandermans B. Editor?s. 1995. Social Movements and Cultur. Monnieapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  8. Marzali, Amri, 2002, Communal Conflicts In Contemporary Indonesia, Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa dan Budaya IAIN Jakarta dan The Knrad Adeneuer Foundation.
  9. McAdam, Doug and David A. Snow. 1997. Social Movements: Reading on The Emergence, Mobilization, and Dynamics. Los Angeles, California: Roxbury Publishing Company.
  10. McAdam, Doug dan Scott, W. Richard. 2002. Organizations and Movements. Makalah dipresentasikan dalam “The Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago”, IL, August, 2002.
  11. McAdam, Doug. 1988. Micromobilization Contexts and Recruitment to Activism. International Social Movement Research 1: 125-54.
  12. Miall, Hugh. 2000. Resolusi Konflik Kontemporer: Penyelesaian, Mencegah, Melola dan Mengubah Konflik Bersumber Politik, Sosial, Agama dan Ras. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  13. Ngadisah. 2003. Konflik Pembangunan dan Gerakan Sosial Politik di Papua. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Raja.
  14. Olzak, Susan and Ryo, Emily. 2004. Organization Diversity, Vitality and Outcomes in the Civil Right Movement: Running Head: Organizational Diversity in the Civil Rights Movement. Makalah disampaikan pada “Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association in San Francisco, 2004.
  15. Rochman, Meuthia Ganie. 2002. An Uphill Struggle: Advocacy NGO’s under Soeharto’s New Order, Jakarta: LabSosio, FISIP-Universitas Indonesia. Silaen, Victor. 2006. Perlawanan Komunitas Lokal pada Kasus Indorayon di Toba Samosir: Gerakan Sosial Baru. Yogyakarta: IRE Press.
  16. Smelser, Neil. 1963. Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press. Surat Kabar Mingguan “Koridor”, Edisi 178, Th. IV, 13 Oktober 2002.
  17. Wahyudi. 2005. Formasi dan Struktur Gerakan Sosial Petani: Studi Kasus Reklaiming/Penjarahan Atas Tanah PTPN XII (Persero) Kalibakar Malang Selatan. Malang: UMM Press.