Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper is aimedat analyzing the social capital ofkopay chili farmers in Payakumbuh City. The characteristicsof social capitalon the kopay chili farmerswere analyzed descriptively from 53 farmers selected using snowball sampling. Thesefarmershadwith longexperiencesin conductingkopay chili farmingin Payakumbuh.The result of the study showedthat the social capital of kopay chili farmers consisted of excellent trust, social norms and networks. Social capital variable havinga high level of farmers perceptionare social norm, namely,activities that help each other amongfarmers. Social capital gave abeneficial for farmers in supporting their farmingactivities. Therefore, the government shouldpay attention to social capital indesigning theagriculturaleducationstrategies for improvingthe kopay chili farmersperformances.

 

Keywords

network social norm trust

Article Details

Author Biographies

Revi Ernanda, Program Magister Sains Agribisnis, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor

Mahasiswa

Burhanuddin Burhanuddin, Departemen Agribisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor

Staf Pengajar

Joko Purwiono, Departemen Agribisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor

Staf Pengajar
How to Cite
Ernanda, R., Burhanuddin, B., & Purwiono, J. (2019). KARAKTERISTIK MODAL SOSIAL PETANI CABAI KOPAY DI KOTA PAYAKUMBUH. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.41-52

References

  1. Carpenter JP, Daniere AG, Takahashi LM. (2004) Social Capital and Trust in South-east Asian Cities. Urban Studies. 41(4): 853-874.
  2. Fukuyama F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.
  3. Hasbullah J. 2006. Social Capital (Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia Indonesia). Jakarta: MR-United Press Jakarta.
  4. Hauberer J. 2011. Social Capital Theory. Germany. VS Research. Jocom AG, 2015. Keterkaitan antara Modal Sosial dan Kemiskinan Menurut Tahapan Perkembangan Desa di Provinsi Gorontalo. [disertasi]. Bogor (ID): IPB.
  5. [Kementan] Kementerian Pertanian. 2016. Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Sub Sektor Hortikultura, Cabai Merah. Jakarta : Kementrian Pertanian RI.
  6. Marin A, Hampton KN. 2007. Simplifying the Personal Network Name Generator: Alternatives to Traditional Multiple and Single Name Generators. Filed Methods. 19(2): 163-193.
  7. Nazir M. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Bogor (ID): Ghalia Indonesia.
  8. Noor J. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. Putnam R. 1993. The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Community Life. The American Prospect. 13(1): 35-42
  9. Rahmadi PZ, Santoso B. 2016. Modal Sosial Petani Sawah Berlahan Sempit dalam Pemenuhan Nafkah Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi. 5(1): 62-73. Rooks G, Oerlemans LAG,
  10. Buys AJ, Pretorius MW. 2005. Industrial Innovation
  11. in South Africa: A comparative study, South African. Journal of Science. 101:149–150.
  12. Sawitri D, Soepriadi IF. 2014. Modal Sosial Petani dan Perkembangan Industri di Desa Sentra Pertanian Labupaten Subang dan Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. 25(1): 17-36.
  13. Suandi. 2007. Modal Sosial dan Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Keluarga di Daerah Perdesaan Provinsi Jambi [disertasi]. Bogor (ID); IPB.
  14. Syahra, Rusdi. 2003. Modal Sosial Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya. 5(1): 1 – 22. Triyoga E. 2014. Dampak Modal Sosial terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia [disertasi].
  15. Bogor (ID): IPB. Vipriyanti NU. 2007. Studi sosial ekonomi tentang keterkaitan antara modal sosial dan pembangunan ekonomi wilayah studi kasus di empat Kabupaten di
  16. Provinsi Bali [disertasi]. Bogor (ID):IPB.
  17. Wafa A. 2003. Urgensi Keberadaan Social Capital dalam Kelompok-kelompok Sosial. Masyarakat: Jurnal Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia. (12): 41-50.