Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 23, 2015
Accepted
September 23, 2015
Published
March 1, 2008
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 286 Download : 222

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Estate small landholders of palm oil were developed by converting wetland area. This research was aimed to study conversion of wetland area into palm oil estate, to study palm oil estate profile of farmers, and to formulate the structure of estate production. This research used survey method combining with indepth interviews. Sixty respondents were selected using simple random sampling method and data were analysed using an analytical description. The finding of this research showed that land conversion occurs due to decreasing village economic under wetland agricultural system. Palm oil estate farmers profile differs between two villages, namely Pasar Seluma (Serawai ethnic) and Rawasari (Java ethnic) in terms of land ownership, productivity, and labour relation. Finally, the production structure were also significantly difference with wetland agricultural system in which the  estate agricltural system close to the structure of oil palm industry.

Keywords

land conversion palm oil estate structure of production land conversion palm oil estate structure of production

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Widiono, S. (2008). STUDI KASUS TERBENTUKNYA PERKEBUNAN KELAPA SAWIT RAKYAT PADA DUA DESA SAWAH ETNIS SERAWAI DAN JAWA DI KABUPATEN SELUMA, PROPINSI BENGKULU. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 7(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.7.1.54-71
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ashari. 2003. Tinjauan tentang Alih Fungsi Lahan Sawah ke Non Sawah dan Dampaknya di Pulau Jawa. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi Vol 21, No. 2, Desember. Hal. 83-98.
  2. [BPN Propinsi Bengkulu]. 1989. Inventarisasi Tanah dalam rangka Penyelesaian Hak Tanah pada Lokasi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit atas nama PT AA di Kecamatan Perwakilan Sukaraja, Kecamatan Seluma, Kabupaten Bengkulu Selatan. (Laporan penelitian). Tanpa penerbit.
  3. [BPS]. 2004. Statistik Potensi Desa Propinsi Bengkulu 2003. Katalog BPS 1610.17. Jakarta, BPS.
  4. [Dirjen Perkebunan]. 2001. Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2000. Jakarta, Dirjen Perkebunan.
  5. Fauzi Y, Widyastuti YE, Satyawibawa I, Hartono R. 2003. Kelapa Sawit: Budidaya, Pemanfaatan Hasil dan Limbah, Analisis Usaha dan Pemasaran. Edisi revisi. Jakarta, Penebar Swadaya.
  6. Geertz C. 1983. Involusi Pertanian: Proses Perubahan Ekologi di Indonesia. (terj. cet. ke-2). Jakarta, Bhratara Karya Aksara.
  7. Hayami, Y dan M. Kikuchi. 1987. Dilema Ekonomi Desa: Suatu Pendekatan Ekonomi terhadap Perubahan Kelembagaan di Asia. Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  8. Hechter M. 1989. Rational Choice Foundations of Social Order. Dalam Jonathan H. Turner (ed). Theory Building in Sociology: Assessing Theoritical Cumulation. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi, Sage Publications.
  9. Kartodirdjo S dan Suryo. 1991. Sejarah Perkebunan di Indonesia: Kajian Sosial Ekonomi. Yogyakarta, Penerbit Aditya Media.
  10. Kuhren F. 1990. Struktur Pertanian (terj). Dalam Ulrich Planck (ed). 1990. Sosiologi Pertanian (terj). Jeakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  11. Kustiwan I. 1997. Konversi Lahan Pertanian di Pantai Utara Jawa. Prisma No. 1 Tahun XXVI, Januari. Hal. 15-31.
  12. Mackie JAC. 1980. The Concept of Dualism and Its Application to Indonesia Agriculture. Dalam RG Garnaut dan PT McCawley (eds). Indonesia: Dualism, Growth and Poverty. Canberra, Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU.
  13. Popkin S. 1986. Petani Rasional (terj). Jakarta, Yayasan Padamu Negeri.
  14. Pahan I. 2007. Panduan Lengkap Kelapa Sawit: Manajemen Agribisnis dari Hulu hingga Hilir. Jakarta, Penebar Swadaya.
  15. Rajagukguk,E. 1995. Hukum Agraria, Pola Penguasaan Tanah dan Kebutuhan Hidup. Jakarta, Chandra Pratama.
  16. Scholz U. 1990. Geografi Pertanian di Sumatera. Dalam Ulrich Planck (ed). Sosiologi Pertanian (terj). Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  17. Tetiani A. 2005. Memudarnya Dualisme Ekonomi: Studi Mobilitas Sosial Komunitas Perkebunan Teh Kertamanah, Pengalengan, Jawa Barat. Tesis. Bogor, Sekolah Pascasajana IPB.
  18. Wiradi G. 1978. Rural Development and Rural Institutions: A Study of Institutional Changes in West Java. Rural Dynamic Series No. 6, Bogor, AES.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>