Main Article Content

Abstract

The The agricultural production risk is greater than non-agriculture risk because agriculture strongly affected by nature such as weather, pest, diseases, temperature, drought, and flooding. The increasing of production through technical efficiency is important to do. The technical efficiency of rice farming can be improved the support or efforts of efficient use of inputs technological innovation. The aim of this study is to analyze the risk of rice farming production in rainfed rice fields. Production risk is analyzed by determining the coefficient of variation. Production risk can be measured by the amount of variance and deviation standard. Technical efficiency is used to analyze the level of technical efficiency. The results showed that rice production risk in rainfed lowland rice in Allepolea Village was greater than the production risk in Bontoa Village and Mattirotasi Village. While for technical efficiency in Mattirotasi Village, it’s more technically efficient for rainfed lowland rice farming than in Bontoa Village and Allepolea Village, Maros Regency.

Keywords

Production Risk Technical Efficiency Rice Farming Rainfed Rice Fields

Article Details

How to Cite
Arifin, A., Zulkifli, Z., Biba, M. A., Pata, A. A., & Sadat, M. A. (2019). RISIKO PRODUKSI DAN EFISIENSI TEKNIS USAHATANI PADI PADA SAWAH TADAH HUJAN DI KABUPATEN MAROS, SULAWESI SELATAN. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(2), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.2.403-411

References

  1. Arifin, 2015. Ketahanan Pangan dan Kontribusi Usahatani Padi pada Sawah Tadah Hujan (Studi Kasus di Desa Allepolea Kecamatan Lau Kabupaten Maros). Jurnal Caliptra 14 (02) : 40 - 46.
  2. Asogwa, BC., Abu, O., dan Ogene, A., 2014. Agricultural Risk Management and Production Efficiency among Peasant Farmers in Benue State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 3 (5) : 373 - 391.
  3. Bokusheva, R., dan Hockmann, H., 2006. Production risk and technical inefficiency in Russian agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics 33 (1) : 93 - 118.
  4. Chavas, JP., dan Shi, G., 2015. An Economic Analysis of Risk, Management, and Agricultural Technology. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 40 (1) : 63 - 79
  5. Indah, LSM., 2015. Analisis Efisiensi Produksi dan Risiko Usahatani Padi Sawah pada Lahan Irigasi Teknis dan Lahan Tadah Hujan di Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana Magister Agribisnis. Universitas Lampung. Bandar Lampung.
  6. Kohansal, MR., dan Aliabadi, MMF., 2014. Impact of Technological Change on Wheat Production Risk in Northwest of Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2 (1) : 17 - 21.
  7. Laanemets, O,. Viira, AH., dan Nurmet, M., 2011. Price, Yield, and Revenue Risk in Wheat Production in Estonia. Agronomy Research 9 (II) : 421 - 426.
  8. Lamusa, A., 2009. Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Alokasi Input Usahatani Padi Sawah di Daerah Impenso Wilayah Taman Nasional Lore Lindu (TNLL) Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Agroland 16 (3) : 251 - 257.
  9. Manihuruk, E., Harianto, dan Kusnadi, N., 2018. Analisis Faktor yang Memengaruhi Petani Memilih Pola Tanam Ubi Kayu serta Efisiensi Teknis di Kabupaten Lampung Tengah. AGRISEP 17 (2) : 139 - 150.
  10. Murniati, K., Mulyo, JH., Irham, dan Hartono, S., 2014. Efisiensi Teknis Usahatani Padi Organik Sawah Tadah Hujan di Kabupaten Tanggamus Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Terapan 14 (1) : 31 - 38.
  11. Muslim, A., 2008. Analisis Tingkat Efisiensi Teknis dalam Usahatani Padi dengan Fungsi Produksi Frontir Stokastik. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan 13 (3) : 191 - 206.
  12. Prihtanti, TM., 2015. Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Padi Organik dan Konvensional : Sebuah Tinjauan Singkat. Prosiding Konser Karya Ilmiah 1: 34 - 41.
  13. Prihtanti, TM., 2014. Analisis Risiko Berbagai Luas Penguasaan Lahan pada Usahatani Padi Organik dan Konvensional. AGRIC 26 (1 & 2) : 29 - 36.
  14. Primilestari, S., dan Edi, S., 2015. Penerapan Teknologi untuk Meningkatkan Produksi Padi Sawah pada Lahan Tadah Hujan Kota Jambi. Prosiding. Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimal. Palembang.
  15. Soltesz, A., Szoke, S., dan Balogh, P., 2013. Analysis of Economic Risks in Sow Production. Journal of Agricultural Informatics 4 (2) : 10 - 21.
  16. Spicka, J., Boudny, J., dan Janotova, B., 2009. The Role of Subsidies in Managing the Operating Risk. AGRIC. ECON 55 (4) : 169 - 179.
  17. Sriyadi, 2010. Risiko Produksi dan Keefisienan Relatif Usahatani Bawang Putih di Kabupaten Karanganyar. Jurnal Pembangunan Pedesaan 10 (2) : 69 - 76.
  18. Suharyanto, Rinaldy, M., dan Ngurah Arya, N., 2015. Analisis Risiko Produksi Usahatani Padi Sawah di Propinsi Bali. Jurnal Agraris. 1 (2) : 70 - 77.
  19. Suharyanto, Mulyo, JH., Darwanto, DH., dan Widodo, S., 2013. Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (PTT) Padi Sawah di Provinsi Bali. Jurnal SEPA 9 (2) : 219 - 230.
  20. Sulewski, P., and Gajewska, AK., 2014. Farmers Risk Perception, Risk Aversion and Strategies to Cope with Production Risk: an Empirical Study from Poland. Studies in Agricultural Economics 116 : 140 - 147
  21. Zakirin, M., Yurisinthae, E., dan Kusrini, N., 2013. Analisis Risiko Usahatani Padi pada Lahan Pasang Surut di Kabupaten Pontianak. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture 2 (1) : 75 - 84.