Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analysed the receipts, costs, and expenses received by red tilapia seed farmers, as well as the level of production risk, price risk and expenditure risk in KPI Mino Ngremboko. The basic method used in this research was a descriptive method. This research was conducted at KPI Mino Ngremboko. The selection of research locations was conducted purposively. The sampling method used was the census method. The analysis was carried out using the coefficient of variation method. Research results there were production risks, price risk, and risk of spending on red tilapia at KPI Mino Ngremboko. The sources of risk that arise were high fish seed mortality rates, increased feed prices, and limited land to increase production. Variation coefficient value (CV) of production risk, price risk, income risk were relatively low that showed the hatchery of red tilapia has a low risk. Meanwhile, the L value of price risk, production risk, and expenditure risk were positive results and the value was greater than BEP. The value shows that when the hatchery reaches the lowest point in production, price, and income, farmers still avoid losses.

Keywords

Risk Red Tilapia Seeds Mino Ngremboko Variation Coefficient Risk Red Tilapia Seeds Mino Ngremboko Variation Coefficient

Article Details

How to Cite
Andhika, R., Setyowati, N., & Qonita, R. A. (2019). ANALISIS RISIKO USAHA PEMBENIHAN IKAN NILA MERAH DI KELOMPOK PEMBUDIDAYA IKAN MINO NGREMBOKO KECAMATAN NGEMPLAK KABUPATEN SLEMAN. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.2.313-330

References

  1. Aditto, S. 2011. Risk Analysis Of Smallholder Farmers In Central And North-East Thailand. Lincoln University Digital Thesis
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 2017. Statistik Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 2017. Badan Pusat Statistika Daerah istimewa Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. 2017. Konsumsi Ikan Per Tahun. https://bps.go.id/. Diakses pada 4 Juni 2018
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Sleman. 2017. Kabupaten Sleman Dalam Angka 2017. Badan Pusat Statistika Kabupaten Sleman. Yogyakarta.
  5. Darmawi, H. 2014. Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
  6. Ekonomi UI
  7. Firdaus, M. 2008. Manajemen Agribisnis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  8. Harwood, J., R. Heifner, K. Coble, J. Perry, dan S. Agapi. 1999. Managing Risk in Farming Concepts, Research, and Analysis. Agricultural Economic Report no. 774. US Department of Agriculture
  9. Harwood, J., R. Heifner, K. Coble, J. Perry, dan S. Agapi. 1999. Managing Risk in Farming Concepts, Research, and Analysis. Agricultural Economic Report no. 774. US Department of Agriculture
  10. Hernanto, F. 1993. Ilmu Usahatani. Jakarta : Penerbit Swadaya
  11. Kecamatan Pamijahan Kabupaten Bogor. Bogor: Departemen
  12. Kumar, A. dan R. Singh. 2017. Risk Analysis in Sugarcane Production: Evidences from Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra States of India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) pp. 1211-1216
  13. Laanemets. 2011. Price, Yield, and Revenue Risk in Wheat Production in Estonia. Agronomy Research 9 (Special Issue II), 421–426, 2011
  14. Lestari, F.R. 2018. Strategi Pemasaran Ikan Nila Merah Pada Koperasi Mina Ngremboko di Kecamatan Ngemplak Kabupaten Sleman.Skripsi S1 Jurusan Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  15. Nicholson, W. 1995. Mikroekonomi Intermediate dan Aplikasinya. Terjemahan dari Intermediate Microeconomics, oleh Agus Maulana. Jakarta : Binarupa Aksara
  16. Simanjuntak, R. 2013. Risiko Produksi Ayam Ras Pedaging Pada Peternakan di
  17. Soekartawi. 2006. Agribisnis Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta : Rajawali Press
  18. Sofyan, A. 2004. Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Jakarta : Lembaga Fakultas
  19. Sunaryo, T. 2009. Manajemen Risiko Finansial. Salemba Empat, Jakarta
  20. Suratiyah, K. 2015. Ilmu Usahatani. Jakarta : Penebar Swadaya

Most read articles by the same author(s)