Main Article Content

Abstract

Rice agribusiness in Indonesia must be competitive so that food security can be
realized. Therefore, it is necessary to improve performance in each subsystem.
One of the subsystems that needs to be improved is the downstream subsystem,
which is processing grain (drying and rice milling). Snowball sampling
technique was applied to select 60 commercial rice mills in three sub-district.
Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) was used to estimate technical efficiency and
to find the sources of inefficiency of the rice milling business in Cianjur
Regency. The results showed that rice mills in study site was ineffecient. Factors
that are affecting the technical efficiency of rice milling business in Cianjur
Regency are the level of formal education, rice yield, and grain moisture
content. Technical efficiency is positively corelated with the gains of rice milling
business. Profits can be used for reinvestment (especially in milling machines),
so that the efficiency of the rice milling business can be increased. In addition,
the rice byproduct industry needs more attention to increase the benefits of the
rice milling business.

Keywords

Rice milling business SFA Technical efficiency

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, T. A., Kusnadi, N., & Rachmina, D. (2019). EFISIENSI TEKNIS USAHA PENGGILINGAN PADI DI KABUPATEN CIANJUR: PENDEKATAN STOCHASTIC FRONTIER ANALYSIS. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.2.203-218

References

  1. Badan Pusat Statistik (ID). 2012. Pendataan Industri Penggilingan Padi 2012. Jakarta (ID): BPS.
  2. Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O?Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Second Edition. New York (US): Springer.
  3. Debertin D.L. 1986. Agricultural Production Economics. New York (US): MacMillan Publishing Company.
  4. Dinas Pertanian Provinsi Jawa Barat (ID). 2013. Area panen, produktivitas, dan produksi tanaman padi di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Bandung (ID).
  5. Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Production Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Vol 120 No. 3 (1957) : 253-290.
  6. Kusnadi, N., Netti, T., Sri, H.S., Adreng, P. 2011. Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Padi di beberapa Sentea Produksi Padi di Indonesia. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. Vol 29 No. 1 (2011).
  7. Nguyen, T.H.A. 2012. Profitablity and Technical Efficiency of Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Culture and White Leg Shrimp (Penaeus vannemei) Culture in Song Cau District, Phu Yen Province, Vietnam. University of Tromso, Norway.
  8. Putri, T. A. 2013. Kinerja Usaha Penggilingan Padi, Studi Kasus Pada Tiga Usaha Penggilingan Padi di Kabupaten Cianjur, Jawa Barat. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia. Vol 1 No. 2 (2013).
  9. Rachmina, D., Maryono. 2008. Analisis Efisiensi Teknis dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Program Benih Bersertifikat: Pendekatan Stochastic Production Frontier. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Ekonomi Pertanian. Vol 2 (2): 11-20.
  10. Rachman, B., Simatupang, P., Sudaryanto, T. 2004. Efisiensi dan Daya Saing Sistem Usahatani Padi. Prosiding Efisiensi dan Daya Saing Sistem Usahatni beberapa Komoditas Pertanian di Lahan Sawah. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Badang Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.
  11. Sawit, M.H. 2011. Reformasi Kebijakan Harga Produsen dan Dampaknya Terhadap Daya Saing Beras. Jurnal Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian 4(1): 1-13. Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian.
  12. Thahir, R. 2010. Revitalisasi Penggilingan Padi Melalui Inovasi Penyosohan Mendukung Swasembada Beras dan Persaingan Global. Pengembangan Inovasi Pertanian: 3(3):171-183. Bogor (ID): Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pascapanen pertanian.
  13. Wongkeawchan, J., Wiboonpongse, A., Sriboonchitta, S., Huang, W.T. 2000. Comparison of Technical Efficiency of Rice Mill Systems. In Thailand and Taiwan. Taiwan: Chiang Mai University.