Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 227 Download : 198

Main Article Content

Abstract

The objective of the research is to analyze the effect of government expenditure, economic growth and previous poverty rate on the current poverty rate in Java and Sumatra. The data set was 267 local governments in year 2017.  The method used in this research was multiple regression. Results show that government expenditure and economic growth affect significantly positively the poverty rate. While the previous poverty rate has negative effect on the current poverty rate. Local governments in Java and Sumatra should make appropriate programmes and activities and allocate optimally their expenditures to build the new SMEs and improve the existing SMEs abilities in order to reduce the poverty rate.

 

Keywords :  A Previous Poverty Rate 1, Economic Growth 2, Government Expenditure 3, Poverty Rate 4

Keywords

a previous poverty rate economic growth government expenditure poverty rate.

Article Details

License
  • This statement is a commitment from the author, to respect copyright, both in terms of quoting the work of others, as well as in the use of journal content. 
  • If needed, the author can send a statement of authenticity of the manuscript. With the receipt of an article by the Editor of Convergence: The Journal of Economic Development, the article submitted has the copyright held by Convergence: The Journal of Economic Development Convergence: 
  • The Journal of Economic Development has the right to reproduce and distribute articles that have been published in journals. 
  • The author is not permitted to publish the same article that has been published in this journal.
How to Cite
Rambe, R. A., & Purmini, P. (2020). KEMAMPUAN BELANJA PEMERINTAH DAN PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI DALAM MENURUNKAN TINGKAT KEMISKINAN: BUKTI EMPIRIS DARI SUMATERA DAN JAWA. Convergence: The Journal of Economic Development, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33369/convergence-jep.v2i1.10996
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adisasmita, Rahardjo. (2011). Pengelolaan Pendapatan dan Anggaran Daerah, Edisi Pertama. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  2. Affandi, A., & Astuti, D.P. (2013). Dynamic model of Ibn Khaldun Theory On Poverty: Empirical Analysis On The Poverty In Majority and Minority Muslim Population After The Financial Crisis. Humanomics, 29(2),136-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661311319193
  3. Alisjahbana, A.S., & Murniningtyas, E. (2018). Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia: Konsep, Target dan Strategi Implementasi. Jawa Barat: Unpad Press.
  4. Celikay, F., & Gumus, Erdal. (2017). The effect of social spending on reducing poverty. International Journal of Social Economics, 44 (5), 620-632. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2015-0274
  5. Chambers, D., Wu, Ying., & Yao, Hong. (2008). The impact of Past Growth on Poverty in Chinese Provinces. Journal of Asian Economics, 19, 348-357. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.04.004.
  6. Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorat, S. (2000). Government Spending, Growth and Poverty in Rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4),1038-1051. http://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00101
  7. Fan, S., & Zhang, X.(2008). Public Expenditure, Growth and Poverty Reduction in Rural Uganda. African Development Review, 20(3), 466-496. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2008.00194.x.
  8. Ginting, A.M., & Dewi, G.P. (2013). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan EKonomi dan Pertumbuhan Sektor Keuangan terhadap Pengurangan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 4(2),117-130. https://jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/ekp/article/view/167/112
  9. Gujarati, D.N. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Ekonometrika. Terjemahan (Mc GrawHill), Edisi ketiga, Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  10. Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M., & Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I. (2018). Long-run effects of public expenditure on poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 16, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-017-9360-z
  11. Jayadi, D.S., & Bata, A.G. (2016). Peran Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dalam Menurunkan Kemiskinan di Tingkat Provinsi di Indonesia Tahun 2004-2012. Modus, 28(1), 87-99. https://ojs.uajy.ac.id/index.php/modus/article/viewFile/669/689
  12. Kuncoro, M. (2003). Ekonomi Pembangunan: Masalah dan Kebijakan, Edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YPKN.
  13. Kuncoro, M. (2013). Mudah Memahami dan Menganalisis Indikator Ekonomi. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YPKN.
  14. Madzinová, R. (2017). Impact Of Government Spending On Income Inequality. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 26(2), 210-220. http://steconomice.uoradea.ro/anale/en_index.html
  15. Mahmudi. (2010). Manajemen Keuangan Daerah, Jakarta: Erlangga.
  16. Mankiw, N.G. (2007). Makroekonomi, Edisi keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  17. Olavarria-Gambi, M. (2003). Poverty Reduction in Chile: has Economic Growth been Enough. Journal of Human Development, 4(1), 103-123. http://doi.org/10.1080/1464988032000051504
  18. Perera, L.D.H., & Lee, G.H.Y. (2013). Have Economic Growth and Institution Quality Contributed to Poverty and Inequality Reduction in Asia? Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 71-86.
  19. Sasmal, R., & Sasmal, J. (2016). Public Expenditure, Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(6), 604-618. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-08-2014-0161
  20. Tsai, Pan-Long., & Huang, Chao-Hsi. (2007). Openness, Growth, and Poverty: The Case of Taiwan. World Development, 35(11): 1858-181. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.013
  21. Rambe, A.Roosemarina., & Purmini. (2020). Kemampuan Belanja Pemerintah dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dalam Menurunkan Tingkat Kemiskinan: Bukti Empiris dari Sumatera dan Jawa. Convergence: The Journal of Economic Development, 2(1), 1-15.