Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 7, 2021
Accepted
October 7, 2021
Published
October 7, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 4667 Download : 9037

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) describe the implementation of Multigrade Learning (PKR), (2) describe teacher obstacles in Multigrade Learning (PKR), (3) describe the efforts of teachers in Multigrade Learning (PKR) at SDN 127 Kaur District. The method used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects of this study were the principal and 3 teachers of SD N 127 Kaur. The technique of collecting data by means of interviews, observation and documentation. Data analysis in this study used an interactive method (analysis of Interactive Model), specifically data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The conclusions of this study are: (1) Implementation of multigrade learning at SD N 127 Kaur has not been able to increase students' interest in learning. (2) Obstacles experienced by PKR teachers are lack of learning spaces and infrastructure. (3) the efforts of the teacher in overcoming obstacles, among others, by utilizing available learning resources and the surrounding environment

Keywords

Keywords Implementation Learning Multigrade

Article Details

License

 

 

How to Cite
Takdir, L. (2021). STUDI IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KELAS RANGKAP DI DAERAH TERPENCIL. Diadik: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v10i2.18279
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anonim. 2015. Sekolah Swasta Terancam Tutup. http://beritasore.com/2015 /06/22/sekolah-swasta-terancam-tutup/
  2. Anonim. Media Audio di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Online. http:/www. depdiknas.go.id/Editorial Jurjal P dan K Ed. 38. Htm
  3. Anwas, O.M. 2006. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kelas Rangkap Berbantuan. (http://www.edukasi. net/artikel/index.php?id=96)
  4. Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  5. Azwar, R.C. 2017. Mencerdaskan Kehidupan Bangsa” Belum Ideal Sesuai
  6. Konstitusi.http://www.tribunnews.com/mpr-ri/2017/12/07/capaian-mencerdaskan-kehidupan-bangsa-belum-ideal-sesuai-konstitusi Baharuddin. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  7. Bali Tribune. Jelang Tahun Ajaran Baru - Banyak Sekolah Swasta di Karangasem Terancam Gulung Tikar. http://balitribune.co.id/content/jelang-tahun-ajaran-baru-banyak-sekolah-swasta-di-karangasem-terancam-gulung-tikar
  8. Birch, I & Lally, M. 1995. Multygrade Teaching in Primary Schools. Bangkok: Unesco.: http:/unesdoc.unesco.org/-images/-0010/001038/103817e.pdf
  9. Budiningsih, C.A. 2006. Pembelajaran Pasca Gempa. Makalah Diklat PTK dalam rangka Peningkatan Kinerja Guru di Daerah Pasca Gempa, yang diselenggarakan oleh Lembaga Penelitian UNY, Oktober 2006.
  10. Burnham, J.W. 2007. Educational Leadership and Democracy. Jurnal of Education. Vol. 1 No. 1 Pg. 1 – 20.
  11. Dick, W and Carey, L. 1990. The System Design of Instruction (3rd. Eds.).Tallahassee: Harper Collins Publisher
  12. Djamarah, S.B. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta
  13. Mason, D.A., Burns, R.B., 1996. Teachers’ views of combination classes. Journal of Educational Research 89 (1), 36–45.
  14. Minter, D dan Reid, M. 2007 Ligthening in A Bootle (Lightening Inovation Strategy), ter. Hais Hariyanto, (Jakarta PT. Serambi Ilmu Sumatra)
  15. Moleong, Lexy J. 2009. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
  16. Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Cetakan 2. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Muchtar, Suwarma. 2005. Pendidikan dan Masalah Sosial Budaya. Bandung: Gelar Pustaka Mandiri.
  18. Nata, A. 2011. Perspektip Islam Tentang Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
  19. Poerwadarminto, W.J.S. 1985. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
  20. Rostiyah N.K 2012. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
  21. Ruminiati. 2008. Pengembangan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan SD. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
  22. Slameto. 1995. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  23. Sukmadinata, N. S. 2008. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
  24. Suryosubroto. 2002. Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  25. Sutama. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, PTK, R &D. Kartasura: Fairus Media.
  26. Syah, M. 2000. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Edisi Revisi.Bandung: Rosda Karya.
  27. Taniredja, T,dkk. 2013. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Efektif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  28. Veenman, S. 1995. Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 319_381.
  29. Wardani. I.G.K. 2004. Pemantapan Kemampuan Mengajar. Jakarta: Pusat Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.
  30. Winataputra, U.S. 1998.Pembelajaran Kelas Rangkap (PKR), Jakarta : Universitas Terbuka.
  31. Zaini, H. 2008. Strategi Pe9mbelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Insan Mandiri.