Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study (1) The application of 3M Learning Strategies can improve students' Poetry Writing Ability in Indonesian class VIII MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam subjects. (2) The application of 3M learning strategies can improve students' learning achievement in Indonesian class VIII subjects at MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam (3) The effectiveness of the application of 3M learning strategies when compared to conventional learning methods. The type of research used is Classroom Action Research (CAR) with 4 stages, namely 1. Action Planning, 2. Action Implementation, 3. Observation and 4. Reflection. This research was conducted in 3 cycles, namely Cycle 1, Cycle 2 and Cycle 3. The population in this study were students of class VIII MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam totaling 197 people. Sampling is done by total sampling, namely the sample is determined by making the entire population into a sample. The research sample that acts as an action class is class VIII.1 MTs Negeri1 Pagar Alam, totaling 28 students. Data collection techniques using observation sheets and tests. The results of this study are the application of 3M learning strategies can improve students' poetry writing skills and student achievement in class VIII MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam

Keywords

3M Learning Strategy Poetry Writing Ability Learning Achievement

Article Details

Author Biography

Lelariana, MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam

MTs Negeri 1 Pagar Alam

How to Cite
Lelariana. (2022). PENERAPAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN 3M (MENIRU, MENGOLAH DAN MENGEMBANGKAN) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MENULIS PUISI DAN PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA. Diadik: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v12i2.24758

References

  1. Arikunto, S. 2010. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
  2. Hadi, Syamsul. 2008. Pembelajaran Menulis Cerpen dengan Strategi 3M. diakses 13 Maret 2013 http://dalilskripsi.com/content/view/43/2/1/7/
  3. Kosasih, E. 2014. Strategi Belajar dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurukulum. Bandung :Yrama Widya
  4. Pradopo, Rachmad, Djoko. 2007. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
  5. Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
  6. Waluyo, Herman, J. 1991. Teori dan Apresiasi Puisi. Jakarta : ErlanggaArifin, Zainal, 2010, Evaluasi Pembelajaran Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
  7. Beetlestone, Florence. 2011. Creative Learning. Bandung: Nusa Media.
  8. DePorter, Bobbi dan Hernacki, Mike. 2013. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa Learning.
  9. DePorter, Bobbi. 2011. Quantum Learning. Bandung: Kaifa Diva Press.
  10. Muslich, Masnur. 2011. Melaksanakan PTK Itu Mudah. Jakarka: Bumi Aksara PRESS.
  11. Nazir, Mohammad. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  12. Sudjana, Nana. 2006. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
  13. Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D.
  14. Bandung: Alfabeta CV.
  15. Tulannisa, 2014. Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar.
  16. Winarni, Endang Widi. 2009. Mengajar IPA Secara Bermakna. Bengkulu: UNIB.
  17. Winata Putra, H. Udin,S. 1992. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.