Main Article Content

Abstract

In the era of globalization, it seems that learning programs have not been able to provide satisfactory results where students focus more passively on learning activities, this is due to the monotonous way of learning that is only receiving from a teacher and at the end of the lesson there is less emphasis on concluding learning. So that problems arise in learning such as tense and boring classes which ultimately affect student learning result. This study aimed at knowing the increase of students’ learning accuracy, students’ achievement and describing the effectiveness of the application of the cooperative type script learning model in the subjects of Akidah Akhlak of Grade X IPS students at MAN 1 Pagaralam. The research method used was School Action Research and Quasi-Experimental. The subjects of this study were 36 students of Grade X IPS students of MAN 1 Pagaralam. Data collection techniques were through observation, documentation studies, questionnaires and test questions, while data analysis and interpretation was carried out by tracking processes, field notes, other materials and Different Tests (t-test) of Quasi-Experimental Research (Wilcoxon). The results showed that the application of the cooperative type script learning model can improve the students’ learning accuracy and learning achievement in the very good category, and the cooperative type script learning model in the Akidah Akhlak subject was more effective in increasing the accuracy of learning and students’ achievement compared to conventional methods, so that there was a significant difference in the results of learning accuracy and students’ achievement before and after the implementation of the cooperative type script learning model. The application of this learning model encouraged the change in perception to meet the demands of active, creative, effective, fun, innovative, happy and quality learning.

Keywords

Learning Model Accuracy Learning Achievement

Article Details

Author Biography

Solihantri, Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Lahat

Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Lahat

How to Cite
Solihantri. (2022). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIVE TYPE SCRIPT UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KECERMATAN DAN PRESTASI BELAJAR. Diadik: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v12i2.24760

References

  1. Ahmadi dkk. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Bandung : Nursamedia.
  2. Al-Tabany, Trianto Ibnu Badar. 2014. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
  3. AnasSudjono, 2010. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  4. AndiPrastowo,2013 Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik, Yogyakarta: DivaPress.
  5. Anggell, Beth and Townsend Lisa. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed
  6. Methods Studies. Work Shop Fot The 2011 Society For Social Work And Research Annual Meeting, Institute For Healt, The State
  7. University Of New Jersey
  8. Arikunto, S. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  9. ______. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
  10. Arikunto, S. Dkk. 2010 Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara
  11. Arikunto, Suharsimi, Suhardjono, Supardi. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  12. Benny, APribac,2009. Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran, Jakarta: PT Dian Rakyat.
  13. Chabib Thoha, dkk, 2004. Metodologi Pengajaran Agama, Semarang: Pustaka Pelajar.
  14. Creswell, J.W., 2013, Research Design Quantitative, Qualitatif and Mix Method Approaches. SagePublication.
  15. _______. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
  16. Depdikbud, 1994. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kuruikulum Pendidikan Dasar Soklah dasar. Jakarta: BP Dharma Bakti
  17. DiniRosdianti, 2013. Perencanaan Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan Jasman, Bandung: Alfabeta.
  18. Dwi Mawarti, 2016. Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatife tipe script untuk meningkatkan keterampilan social dan hasil belajar IPS Siswa kelas V C SD Negeri Brantiraya Lampung selatan.
  19. Elaine B. Johnson, 2007. Contextual Teaching & Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna, trj. Ibnu Setiawan Bandung: MLC.
  20. Fachruddin Saudagar dan Ali Idris, 2009. Pengembangan Profesionalitas Guru, Jakarta: GP . Press.
  21. Hamdani, 2010StrategiBelajarMengajar, Bandung:PustakaSetia.
  22. Hamiyah, N. Dan M. Jauhar. 2014. Strategi Belajar-Mengajar di Kelas. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
  23. Hidayati, 2018. Peningkatan keterampilan berbicara melalui pendekatan komunikatif kelas V SD Pedurenan II di Bekasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar. Vol.5, No.2 , diunduh pada 28 April 2021
  24. Hisyam,Zainidkk,2008StrategiPembelajaranAktif,Yogyakarta:PustakaInsanMadani
  25. Harjanto,2011.PerencanaanPengajaran,Jakarta:RinekaCipta
  26. Iskandar Dadang dan Narsim. 2015. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Publikasinya. Cilacap: Ihya Media
  27. Juwono, 2014 .Indikator Kecermatan. http://siswojowono.blogspot.co.id. Diakses 12 Mei 2021.
  28. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2014. Keputusan Menteri Agama RI No. 165 tahun 2014; tentang Pedoman Kurikulum Madrasah 2013 Mata Pelajaran PAI dan Bahasa Arab di Madrasah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  29. Kementrian Agama, 2016. Akidah Akhlak Kelas X MA. Jakarta: Kemenag
  30. Kemmis and Mc Tanggart dalam Iskandar Dadang dan Narsim. 2015. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Publikasinya. Cilacap: Ihya Media
  31. Kusuma, 2019. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran ARIAS dan Cooperative Script terhadap Minat dan Hasil Belajar Matematika, ANARGIYA, Vol.2 No.1, diunduh pada 28 April 2021
  32. Maria Ulfah, 2018. Pengaruh penerepan model cooperative script terhadap hasil belajar siswa di MI Munawariyah Palembang. Skripsi. Palembang UIN Raden Fatah.
  33. Melvin L. Siberman. 2014. Active Learning; 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.
  34. Miftahul A’la. 2011. Pembelajaran Cooperative Script. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Belajar.
  35. Nanang, Hanafiah, dkk, 2010. Strategi pembelajaran,Bandung:Refika AditamadanR.Gloser EDS.
  36. Neuman, W. L., 2014, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Seventh Edition, Pearson Education Limited, United States of America.
  37. Ngalimun,2014. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran, Yogakarta:AswajaPresindo.
  38. Raharjanti, 2016. Kecermatan Siswa Mengamati Kata Kunci pada Soal Cerita Materi Perbandingan Terbalik Nilai. Jurnal Agribisnis Terpada . Vol.1 No.3, diunduh 01 Mei 2021.
  39. Rusman, 2012. Model - Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: RajawaliPers.
  40. Sarwadi, dkk, 2014. Top Quality Psikotes : Superakurat-Superlengkap, Yogyakarta : Trans Idea Publishing.
  41. Samihah Mahmud Gharib, 2006. Membekali Anak Dengan Akidah, Jakarta : Maghfirah Pustaka
  42. Shoimin, 2014. Mode Pembelajaran Inovativ dalam Kurikulum 2013 Yogyakarta: Ar-RuzzMedia.
  43. Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaj Rosdakarya.
  44. Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:Alfebata.
  45. Suprijono,dkk 2012. Cooperative LearningTeoridan AplikasiPAIKEM, Yogyakarta:PustakaBelajar.
  46. Supranto. 2006. Mengukur Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan atau Konsumen. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  47. Trianto, 2011. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep Strategi Dan Implementasinya Dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
  48. _____,2013Model-ModelPembelajaranModernJakarta:PTBumi Aksara.