Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 11, 2024
Accepted
December 13, 2024
Published
December 31, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 72 Download : 22

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between Bézout domain, elementary divisor domain, and adequate domain. A Bézout domain is an integral domain D which every finitely generated ideal of D is principal. An integral domain D is called an elementary divisor domain if every matrix over D is equivalent to Smith normal form matrix. An adequate domain D is a  Bézout domain and RP(a,b) exists for all a,b∈D with a≠0. Here the notion RP(a,b) defined as the relatively prime part of a with respect to b. It is found that every elementary divisor domain is a Bézout domain, but the converse is not true in general. It is shown the sufficient conditions for the Bézout domain being an elementary divisor domain. We also find out that every adequate domain is an elementary divisor domain. Furthermore, every one-dimensional Bézout domain is an adequate domain.

Keywords

Adequate domain Bézout domain Elementary divisor domain

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Erlangga Adinugroho Rohi, Syahida Amalia Rosyada, Sri Wahyuni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rohi, E. A., Rosyada, S. A., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). The Relation Between Bézout Domain, Elementary Divisor Domain, and Adequate Domain . Diophantine Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications, 3(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.33369/diophantine.v3i2.37436
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. J.W. Brewer, C. Naude, and G. Naude, “On Bézout domains, elementary divisor rings, and pole assignability”, Communications in Algebra, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 2987-3003, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927878408823140
  2. J.W. Brewer, J.W. Bunce, and F.S. Van Vleck, Linear Systems over Commutative Rings, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1986.
  3. J.W. Brewer, D. Katz, and W. Ullery, “On the pole assignability property over commutative rings”, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, vol. 48, pp. 1-7, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(87)90103-4
  4. J.W. Brewer, D. Katz, and W. Ullery, “Pole assignability in polynomial ring, power series rings, and Prüfer domains”, Journal of Algebra, vol. 106, pp. 265-286, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(87)90031-7
  5. E. Emre, “Regulation of linear systems over rings by dynamic output feedback”, Systems & Control Letters, vol. 3, pp. 57-62, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6911(83)90039-7
  6. E. Emre and P.P. Khargonekar, “Pole placement for linear systems over Bézout domains”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. AC-29, no. 1, pp. 90-91, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1984.1103371
  7. I. Kaplansky, “Elementary divisors and modules”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 66, pp. 464-491, 1949. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1949-0031470-3
  8. B. Zabavsky and A. Gatalevych, “A commutative Bézout domain PM* domain is an elementary divisor ring”, Algebra and Discrete Mathematics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 295-301, 2015.
  9. M.D. Walton, Bézout Domains and Elementary Divisor Domains: Are They the Same? M.Sc. [Theses]. Utah: BYU, 2023. Available: BYU ScholarsArchive.
  10. D.S. Dummit and R.M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, Third Edition, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004.
  11. H. Chen and M.S. Abdolyousefi, “Elementary matrix reduction over Bézout domains”, Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 1-12, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021949881950141X
  12. D. Lorenzini, “Elementary divisor domains and Bézout domains”, Journal of Algebra, vol. 371, pp. 609-619, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.08.020
  13. B.V. Zabavsky, O.V. Domsha, and O.M. Romaniv, “Clear rings and clear elements”, Matematychni Studii, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 3-9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.30970/ms.55.1.3-9
  14. M.X. Larsen, W.J. Lewis, and T.S. Shores, “Elementary divisor rings and finitely presented modules”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 187, pp. 231-248, 1974. https://doi.org/10.2307/1997051
  15. W.C. Brown, Matrices over Commutative Rings, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993.
  16. C. Caldeira and J.F. Queiró, “Invariant factor of products over elementary divisor domains”, Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 485, pp. 345-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2015.07.038
  17. O. Helmer, “The elementary divisor theorem for certain rings without chain condition”, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 49, pp. 225-236, 1943. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1943-07886-X
  18. N. Mahdou and M. Zennayi, “On adequate rings”, Journal of Taibah University for Science, vol. 9, pp. 320-325, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2015.01.006
  19. L. Gillman and M. Henriksen, “Some remarks about elementary divisor rings”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 82, pp. 362-365, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1956-0078979-8
  20. M. Zennayi, “On adequate rings: the basic properties”, Gulf Journal of Mathematics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 48-56, 2015. https://doi.org/10.56947/gjom.v3i3.147
  21. L. Gillman and M. Henriksen, “Rings of continuous functions in which every finitely generated ideal is principal”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 366-391, 1956. https://doi.org/10.2307/1993054
  22. J.W. Brewer, P.F. Conrad, and P.R. Montgomery, “Lattice-ordered groups and a conjecture for adequate domains”, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 31-35, 1974. https://doi.org/10.2307/2039319
  23. R. Gilmer, Multiplicative Ideal Theory, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1972.