Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 27, 2021
Accepted
March 27, 2021
Published
March 27, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 195 Download : 1396

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of the effectiveness of the audit committee and the quality of the external auditors on the possibility of financial statement fraud.

The population in this study are non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Based on the purposive sampling method, 104 companies were selected as samples. The sample is categorized into two categories, namely fraud companies and non-fraud firms.

This study found that the independent audit committee, the number of audit committee meetings, the expertise of the audit committee, the gender diversity of the audit committee, the ethnicity of the audit committee, and the quality of the external auditors did not affect the likelihood of financial statement fraud. In addition, company size and leverage do not affect the possibility of fraudulent financial statements. Meanwhile, company performance actually affects the possibility of financial statement fraud.

Keywords

Financial Statement Fraud Effectiveness of Audit Committee and External Auditors Quality

Article Details

How to Cite
Indella, D. R., & Husaini, H. (2021). EFEKTIVITAS KOMITE AUDIT, KUALITAS AUDITOR EKSTERNAL DAN KEMUNGKINAN KECURANGAN PELAPORAN KEUANGAN. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 6(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v6i3.15137
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, S, N., & Nasir, N, M. 2004. Accrual management and the independence of the boards of directors and audit committees. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management Vol. 12, no. 1.
  2. Alwi, Maliah, Wan Ismail Wan Adibah dan Khairul Anuar Kamarudin. 2013. The Effectiveness Of Audit Committee In Relation To Financial Reporting Fraud. The 5th International Conference on Financial Criminology (ICFC).
  3. Amiruddin dan Sundari, Sri. 2012. Fraud: Bagaimana Mendeteksinya?. repository.unhas.ac.id, tanggal 5 Oktober 2014 pukul 19.20.
  4. Anisa, Widia Nur. 2012. Pengaruh Financial Expertise Of Committee Audit Member, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Leverage Terhadap Terjadinya Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan (Studi Pada Perusahaan-Perusahaan Yang Listed (Go Public) Di Bursa Efek Jakarta (Bej) Tahun 2002-2006). Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Dipenogoro.
  5. BAPEPAM LK. 2012. Pembentukan dan pedoman pelaksanaan kerja komite audit. Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan Nomor: KEP-643/BL/2012. www.google.com , tanggal 28 September 2014 pukul 14.00.
  6. Beasley, Mark S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. Accounting Review, 443-465.
  7. Beasley, Mark S, Joseph V Carcello, Dana R Hermanson. 2000. Preventing Fraudulent Financial Reporting. The CPA Journal.
  8. Beneish. Messod Daniel. 1999. The Detection of Earning Manipulation. Financial Analyst Journal.
  9. Beneish, Messod Daniel. 2012. Fraud Detection and Expected Returns. Working Paper Series.
  10. Dwiputri, Intan Izzati. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Pengungkapan Etika Dan Unsur Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kemungkinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Thesis. Jakarta Barat : Binus University.
  11. D’Onza, Giuseppe., Lamboglia, Rita. (2011). Internal Audit and Corporate Governance Conference.
  12. Elder, Randal J, dkk. 2012. Jasa Audit dan Assurance Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia) Buku 1 hal: 19. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  13. Farber, D. B. 2005. Restoring Trust After Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter?. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539-561.
  14. Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS Edisi: 7. Semarang : Badan penerbit UNDIP.
  15. Huang, H. W. dan Thiruvadi, S. 2010. Audit Committee Characteristics and Corporate Fraud. International Journal of Public Information Systems.
  16. Husaini. 2012. Audit Committee Characteristics and Enterprise Risk Management of Indonesian Public Listed Bank. Proccedings The 12th Malaysia Indonesia International Conference on Economics, Mangement, and Accounting. Palembang : Unsri.
  17. Husaini. 2009. Komite Audit dan Audit Internal : Integritas Pengawasan Korporasi. Semarang: UNPAD Press.
  18. International Standards on Auditing (ISA) seksi 240. The Auditor’s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. www.google.com, tanggal 28 September 2014 pukul 15.15.
  19. Jensen, M. C and Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Oktober, 1976, V.3, No.4, pp. 305-360. http://papers.ssrn.com, tanggal 5 Oktober 2014, pukul 19.15.
  20. Kartikarini, Nurrahmah dan Mutmainah, Siti. 2014. Analisis Pengaruh Diversitas Gender Terhadap Voluntary Corporate Governance Disclosure Dalam Laporan Tahunan Perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting Volume 2, Nomor 1.
  21. Kayu, Nariya. 2012. Teori Agensi. dukuntansi.wordpress.com, tanggal 17/11/2014, pukul 20.15
  22. Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG). 2006. Pedoman Umum Good
  23. corporate governance Indonesia, Jakarta. www.google.com, tanggal 5 Oktober 2014, pukul 20.00.
  24. Pamudji, Sugeng dan Trihartati, Aprillya. 2010. Pengaruh Independensi Dan Efektifitas Komite Audit Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting.
  25. Purwati, A. S. 2006. “Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Publik yang Tercatat di BEJ”. Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana Magister Sains Akuntansi UNDIP. Semarang.
  26. Pasal 26 ayat 1-3. UUD 1945. Https://hjrifqah.wordpress.com, tanggal 27/11/2014, pukul. 21.00.
  27. Pertiwi, Dinal Eka. 2013. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Penerapan Manajemen Risiko (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Non Keuangan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Skripsi. Bengkulu : Program Sarjana. Universitas Bengkulu.
  28. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). 2003. Global Economic Crime Survey 2003. http://www.pwc.com/extweb/ncsurvers.nsf, tanggal 12/12/2014, pukul. 21.00.
  29. Rahmanti, Martantya Maudy. 2013. Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Melalui Faktor Risiko Tekanan dan Peluang. Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Dipenogoro.
  30. Rezaee, Z., Crumbley, D. L. and Elmore, R. C. 2004. Forensic Accounting Education: A Survey of Academicians and Practitioners. Social Science Research Network.
  31. Rustiarini, Ni Wayan. 2012. Komite Audit Dan Kualitas Audit: Kajian Berdasarkan Karakteristik, Kompetensi, Dan Aktivitas Komite Audit. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi. sna.akuntansi.unikal.ac.id/makalah/106-SIPE-50 pdf
  32. Sekaran , Uma. 2006. Research Methods for Bussiness. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
  33. Spathis, Charalambos T. 2002. Detecting False Financial Statements Using Published Data: Some Evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 13, h. 53-82.
  34. Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. 2007. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigasi Edisi: 1. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
  35. Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. 2010. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigasi Edisi: 2. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
  36. Thiruvadi, S. 2008. Gender Differences and Audit Committee Characteristics. Working Paper. Http:// digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations. tanggal 5/11/2014, pukul 20.15.
  37. Uzun, H., Szewczyk, S. H., & Varma, R. (2004). Board Composition and Corporate Fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, 33-43.
  38. Wibowo, Rahmat Haryo. 2012. Pengaruh Struktur Governance Dan Etnisitas Terhadap Fee Audit (Studi Pada Perusahaan Yang Listing Di Indeks Kompas 100). Skripsi. Samarinda : Politeknik Bisnis Lamda.