Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the investment opportunity set (IOS), audit quality, debt maturity, and institutional ownership on debt costs.
The population of this research is all manufacturing companies listed on the IDX in 2011-2014. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, obtained a sample of 72 companies. Data analysis used OLS (Ordinary Least Square).
The results showed that audit quality has a negative effect on the cost of debt, while the investment opportunity set (IOS), debt maturity, and institutional ownership do not affect the cost of debt.

Keywords

Government characteristics audit findings regional financial performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Robiansyah, A., Kamaludin, K., & Aziza, N. (2021). KUALITAS AUDIT SEBAGAI PENENTU BIAYA HUTANG PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v7i2.15149

References

  1. Abor, J Dan Bokpin, G. A. (2010). Investment Opportunities, Corporate Finance, And Devidend Payout Policy: Evidence From Emerging Markets. Studies In Economic And Finance, Vol. 27, No. 3: Hal. 180-194.
  2. Aivazian, Varouj A.,Ying Ge dan Jiaping Qiu. (2007). Debt Maturity Stucture and Firm Investment. Financial Management, 34 (4), Hal. 107-119.
  3. Atmaja, Lukas Setia.(1999). Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi 2, Andi Offest. Jakarta Berlin, M. (2005). Debt Maturity: What Do Economic Say? What Do CFO Say?.
  4. Federal Reserve Bank Of Philadelphia.
  5. Bhojraj, Sanjeev & Sengupta, Partha. (2003). Effect of corporate on bond ratings and yields: the role of institutional investor and outside directors. Retrieved from: http://ssrn. com/abstract=291056.
  6. Bringham, Eugene F, dan Houston, Joel F, (2001). Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi 8. Jakarta: Erlangga. Hal. 407
  7. Causholli, M & W.R. Knechel (2012). Lending Relationships, Auditor Quality And Debt Cost. Managerial Auditing Journal. Vol.27 Iss.6 Hal.550-572.
  8. Cornett M. M, Marcuss, S.J. & Tehranian, H. (2006). Earnings management, corporate governance, and true financial performance. Retrieved from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=886142.
  9. Crutchley, C. E dan R. S. Hansen. (1999). A Test of the Agency Theory of the Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management Winter, Hal. 36-46.
  10. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economic, Juli 1981, Vol. 3 Hal.183-199.
  11. Diamond, D.W. (1991). Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk. Quarterly Journal of Economic. 106, Hal.709-737.
  12. Elyasiani, E. J. Jia and C. X. Mao. (2010). Institusional Ownership Stability and The Cost Of Debt. Journal of Financial Markets. 13, Hal.475-500.
  13. Fabozzi, F.J. (2007). Bond markets, analysis, and strategies (ed.8). New Jearsey: Prentice Hall.
  14. Fitriyah, Fury K dan Hidayat, Dina. (2011). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Set Kesempatan Investasi, Dan Arus Kas Bebas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal Media Riset Akuntansi, vol.1 (1).
  15. Gaver, J.J., and K.M. Gaver. (1993). Additional Evidence on The Association Between The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend and Compensation Policies, Journal of Accounting and Economics. 16. Hal.125.160.
  16. Ghozali, Prof. Dr. Imam M. Com., Akt. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 21, Update PLS Regresi.Edisi 7. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  17. Hartono, jogiyanto. (1999). Agency Cost Explanation For Deviden Payment. Working paper, UGM
  18. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia (2014). PSAK no.26. Biaya Pinjaman. Jakarta: Graha Akuntan
  19. Indriantoro, Nur dan Bambang Supomo. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Cetakan Kedua. Edisi Juni. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  20. Jensen, MC dan William H Meckling. (1976). Theory of The Firm : Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Juli 1976, Vol. 3 Hal.305-360.
  21. Juniarti & A.A. Sentosa. (2009). Pengaruh Corporate Governance dan Voluntary Disclosure terhadap Biaya Hutang (Cost of Debt). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 11, No. 2, Hal.88-100.
  22. Kartiko, Sigit Wahyu dan Dwi Martani. (2015). Peran Implisit Kualitas Audit dalam Menekan Perilaku Tax Avoidance. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 18, Medan 16-19 September 2015.
  23. Kim. J. B., B. Y. Song., & J. S. L. Tsui. (2007). Auditor Quality, Tenure, and Bank Loan Pricing. Working Paper, Hongkong Polytechnic University.
  24. Lai, Kam-Wah. (2011). The Cost Of Debt When All-Equity firms Raise finance: The Role Of Investment Opportunities, Audit Quality And Debt Maturity. Journal Of Banking & Finance 35, 2011. Hal.1931-1940
  25. Murni, Sri Dan Adriana., (2007). Pengaruh Insider Ownership, Institusional Investor, Deviden Payment, Dan Firm Growth Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta), Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, Vol. 7 No. 1, Februari, Hal.15-24.
  26. Myers, S. (1977). “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”, Journal of Financial Economics 5, PP. 147-176.
  27. Nurmasari, Nuraini Desty (2015). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan Institusional, kebijakan dividen, pertumbuhan Perusahaan, dan profitabilitas terhadap Kebijakan hutang perusahaan (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar Di bursa efek indonesia). Skripsi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Tidak Diterbitkan
  28. Patricia, Mayang, (2014). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Set Kesempatan Investasi, Dan Arus Kas Bebas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Semarang. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro.
  29. Penman, SH. (2001). Financial Statment Analysis And Security Valuation. International Edition. Mcgraw-Hill Irwin. Singapore.
  30. Pittman, J.A. & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor Choice and the Cost of Debt Capital for Newly Public Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 37, February, Hal.113-36.
  31. Prasetyo, Rian Eko Dan Raharja, Surya. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Cost Of Debt Dengan Usia Perusahaan Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi (Studi Pada Perusahaan Yang Melakukan Ipo Di Bei Tahun 2008-2012). Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting. ISSN (Online): 2337-3806, Vol. 2, No. 3, Thn 2013, Hal. 1-12
  32. Rahmawati, Annisa. (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelaporan Keuangan Dan Maturitas Utang Terhadap Efisiensi Investasi. Diponegoro Journal
  33. Accounting. Vol. 3 No.3 Hal.1-12
  34. Ratnasari, Fitriana (2014). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor dan Karakteristik Perusahaan terhadap Biaya Utang (Cost Of Debt). Skripsi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. Tidak Diterbitkan
  35. Roberts, G. S. dan L. Yuan. (2009). Doest Institusional Ownership Affect The Cost of Bank Borrowing? Working Paper. York Univesity.
  36. Safitri, Indah. (2015). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional Dan Free Cash Flow terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, Vol.4 No.7 Sarmento, Jaquelina N. L. (2014). The Effect Investment Opportunity Set (IOS)
  37. And Corporate-Financing On Devidend Payyout Policy (A Study On Automative And Components Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2009-2011). Jurnal administrasi bisnis (JAB), Vol. 13. No. 2. August
  38. Sartika, Widya. (2012). Analisis Hubungan Pengihindaran Pajak Terhadap Biaya Hutang Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Skripsi S1. Tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta
  39. Sekaran, Uma. (2006). Metodelogi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  40. Shelly (2009). Pengaruh Free Cash Flow Dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Pada Perusahaan Food And Beverages Di BEI. Skripsi USU Medan. Tidak Diterbitkan.
  41. Shleifer, A dan R.W. Vishny. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy. Vol.94, Hal. 461-488.
  42. Titman, S Dan B. Trueman (1986). Information Quality And The Valuation Of New Issues. Journal Of Accounting And Economic, Vol.8 Hal..159-172
  43. Wahidawati. (2002), Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Pada Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan: Sebuah Perspektif Theory Agency, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol.5, No.1, Hal 1-16..