Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 28, 2021
Accepted
March 28, 2021
Published
March 28, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 151 Download : 951

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to examine of effect the relation between ERM, firm complexity and firm value in the Indonesian public listed manufacture companies. Firm size is used moderation variable the effect of firm complexity on ERM. Except as independent variable, ERM used mediation variable the effect of firm complexity on firm value. Tobin’sQ is used to measure the firm value, segment of industry used to measure the firm complexity and indexs ERM used to measure the effective of implementation ERM system.
This study is use all manufacture company listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2010-2011 with the purposive sampling method. By exploring the purposive sampling method, the 82 manufacture company listed on BEI were selected as a sample of this study. Data analysis using linier regression with SPPS 16.
The empirical results of regression model found that ERM and firm complexity possitevely related the firm value. The result support the hypothesis that firm complexity related with ERM. Meanwhile, this study could not find an empirical evidence moderation variable and mediation variable.

Keywords

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) firm complexity firm size and firm value

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmadani, Y. M., & Husaini, H. (2021). ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, KOMPLEKSITAS DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI INDONESIA. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 7(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v7i2.15153
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ariani, R .2011. Manajemen Risiko Enterprise. (online,diakses 28 desember 2011). Tersedia di World Wide Web: http://gangsir.com
  2. Arifin, Zaenal. 2005. Teori Keuangan dan Pasar Modal. Yogyakarta, BPFE.
  3. AS/NZS. 2004. Risk Management Standard AS/NZS 4360: 2004. Council of Standards Australia and Council of Standards New Zealand.
  4. Baron, R. M., dan Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator?mediator variable distinction social psychological research: Conceptual strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Penality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173?112
  5. Bastian, Indra .2006. Akuntansi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta:Erlangga
  6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2003. Trends in Risk Integration and Aggregation. Bank for International Settlements. Basel, Switzerland.
  7. Bateman Thomas, & Snell Scot. 2008. Manajemen–Kepemimpinan dan Kolaborasi dalam Dunia Yang Kompetitif, edisi 7 buku 1. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
  8. Beasley, M., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 521-531. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001
  9. Brigham, E.F. dan Gapenski, LouisC., 1996. Intermediate finance management. (5^thed.). Harbor Drive: The Dryden Press.
  10. CAS (The Casualty Actuarial Society). 2003. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management. http://www.casact.org
  11. Chapman, Robert J. (2006). Tools and Techniques of Enterprise Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  12. Christiawan, Yulius J. dan Tarigan J. 2007. Kepemilikan Manajerial: Kebijakan Hutang, Kinerja dan Nilai Perusahaan,Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol. 9 No. 1.
  13. COSO . 2004. Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commisson. New York.
  14. Daniati, N. dan Suhairi. 2006. Pengaruh kandungan informasi komponen arus kas, laba kotor dan size perusahaan terhadap expected return saham. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 23026 Agustus 2006:1-23.
  15. Endrianto ,W. 2010. Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Basel dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Manajemen Risiko pada PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero TBK). Tesis dipublikasikan. Jakarta. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
  16. Ghozali, Imam. 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS, Cetakan ke IV, Semarang : Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
  17. Gitosudarmo, Indriyo. 2002. Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi Keempat. BPFE, Yogyakarta.
  18. Golshan N. Mottaghi dan Rasid S. Abdul. 2012. Determinats of Enterprise risk management adoption: an empirical analysis of Malaysia public listed firms. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences 6.
  19. Golshan N. Mottaghi dan Rasid S. Abdul. 2012. What leads Enterprise risk management adoption?a literature review. International Conference on Economic Business and Marketing Management IPEDR, Vol.29.
  20. Gujarati, Damodar. 2003. Ekonometrika Dasar : Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  21. Hackston, david dan Milne, J. Markus. 1996. Some determinant of socialand envioremental disclosuresin New Zealand company. Accounting, Auditing dan Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, 1996, pp 77-108. MCB Univercity Press, 0951-3574.
  22. Herawaty, V. 2008. Peran Praktek Corporate Governance Sebagai Moderating Variabel Dari Pengaruh Earning Management Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 97-108.
  23. Hoyt E. Robert dan Liebenberg P. Andre. 2009. The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Working paper.
  24. Husaini .2009. Komite audit & Audit Internal: Integritas Pengawasan Korporasi. UNPAD Press: Bandung.
  25. Husnan, Suad dan Pudjiastuti, Enny. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. UPP AMP YKPN : Yogyakarta
  26. Hutabarat, Jemsly dan Haseini, Marteni. 2006. Manajemen strategic kontemporer (proses, formasi dan implementasi). Jakarta: Medio.
  27. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. 2009. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  28. Indrianto, N. dan Bambang S. 2002. Metodelogi Penelitian Bisnis : Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen . Yogyakarta : BPFE Yogyakarta.
  29. Institute of Internal Auditors . 2002. The Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (SPPIA)
  30. ISO. 2009. AS/NZS ISO 31000: 2009 Risk Management, Principles and Guidelines. ISO 2009.
  31. Jensen, M.C., dan Meckling W. H., .1976. Theory of the firm: manajerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of financial and economic, vol.3, pp. 305-360.
  32. McShane M.K , Nair A dan Rustambekov E. 2011. Does enterprise risk management increase firm value?. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 26(4) 641-658.
  33. Pearce dan Robinson. 2008. Manajemen Strategis –Formulasi,Implementasi, dan Pengendalian Edisi 10 buku 1.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  34. Rapika, Indah. 2012. Pengaruh good corporate governance terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan enterprise risk manajemen sebagai variabel moderating. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Bengkulu, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bengkulu.
  35. Sartono, Agus .2010. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Aplikasi . Edisi 4. Yogyakarta: HBP-FE Yogyakarta.
  36. Sharma, S. dan Durand, M. 1981. Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Working paper of University of Michigan.
  37. Suandy, Erly. 2008. Perencanaan pajak, Edisi 4. Salemba 4: Jakarta.
  38. Sudarmadji dan Sularto. 2007. “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas Leverage dan Tipe Kepemilikan Perusahaan terhadap Luas Voluntary Disclosure Laporan Keuangan Tahunan”. http://repository.Gunadarma.ac.id (Diakses pada tanggal 17 Oktober 2013)
  39. Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. CV Alfabeta, Bandung.
  40. Tahir Izah M. dan Razali A. Rizal. 2011. The Relationship between Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Firm Value: Evidence From Malaysian Public Listed Companies. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Vol.1, No. 2, pp. 32-41.
  41. Trisniana, Ece. 2013. Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Enterprise Risk Management (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Bengkulu, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Bengkulu.
  42. Tseng, C.Y. 2007. Internal Control, Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance. Doctoral Thesis of University of Maryland. Baltimore.
  43. Zhao Xinshu, Lynch John G. dan Chen Q. (2009). Reconsidering Baron dan Kenny: Myths dan Truths about Mediation Analysis. Manuscript 08-0082-2 re-submitted to Journal of Consumer Research.