Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 31, 2021
Accepted
March 31, 2021
Published
March 31, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 279 Download : 744

Main Article Content

Abstract

Accounting is a form of accountability and conveying financial information of a company or organization to parties concerned. However, the accounting report could potentially be affected by private interests, while the users of financial reports are very concerned to receive reliable financial reports. Therefore there is a need for an independent third party to mediate the two parties (agent and principal) with different interests. The independent party is an auditor who is responsible to provide assessment and opinion statement on the fairness of the financial report presented. DeAngelo (1981) defines audit quality as "the probability of an auditor is able to find and report irregularity in client's accounting system”.
This study aimed to empirically examine the effect of rotation of the public accounting firms, audit tenure, and the size of the public accounting firms on audit quality. The population of the data is the entire manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 to 2016.
This study used purposive sampling method to select sample from the population. Based on this method, sample of 51 manufacturing firms were obtained from the period 2011-2016. The multiple linear regression was used to analysis data. Proxy measurements for audit quality is using discretionary accrual Kazsnik model (1999).
The results of multiple regression analysis show that the size of public accounting firm positivly affecting on audit quality while the rotation of the public accounting firms and audit tenure has no effect on audit quality.

Keywords

Auditor rotation audit tenure size of the public accounting firms audit quality discretionary accrual.

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Faisal, STIE NU Bengkulu




How to Cite
Faisal, M. (2021). PENGARUH ROTASI KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK (KAP), TENURE AUDIT DAN UKURAN KAP TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 9(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v9i2.15232
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agoes, Sukrisno. (2004). Auditing (Pemeriksaan Akuntan) oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik. Edisi Ketiga. Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Trisakti.
  2. Al-Thuneibat, A.A., Al Issa, R.T.I. and Baker, R.A.A. (2011), “Do Audit Tenure and Firm Size Contribute to Audit Quality”. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 317-334.
  3. Arens, Alvin A., dan James K. Loebbecke, (2000). Auditing An Integrated Approach, Alih Bahasa Amir Abadi Jusuf, Eighth, Jilid 1, Prentice – Hall International, Inc, New York.
  4. Arrunada, Benito dan Paz-Ares Candido. (1997).”Mandatory Rotation of Company Auditors: A Critical Examination.” International Review of Law and Economics 17:31-61.
  5. Beatty, R.P. and Ritter, J.R. (1986). “Investment Banking, Reputation and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings”, Journal of Financial Economics, 15:1, pp.213-232.
  6. Becker, B. & Gerhart, B. (1996), The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal. 39(4), 779-801.
  7. Boynton, William C. Johnson., Raymond N. and Kell, Walter G (2001). “Modern Auditing”, Edisi Ketujuh, Jilid 2, Erlangga, Jakarta.
  8. Carcello, J.V., & Nagy A.L., (2004), ?Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting?.Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory.Vol.23 (2): Pp. 55-69.
  9. Carey, Peter. Simnett, Roger. (2006). Audit Partnet Tenure and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review.
  10. Chi, W., (2009). Mandatory Audit-Partner Rotation, Audit Quality and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan www.ssrn.com.
  11. Choi, J., F. Kim, J. Kim, and Y. Zang. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing.Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. Vol. 29. No. 1 May. Pp 73-97.
  12. DeAngelo, LE. (1981). Auditor Size and Auditor Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Dec, Vol.3, No.3:183-199.
  13. Fitriany. (2011). Pengaruh tenure, rotasi dan spesialisasi Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit: perbandingan sebelum dan sesudah regulasi rotasi KAP di Indonesia. Depok. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia.
  14. Ghozali, Imam. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Cetakan Keempat. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  15. Healy, P. (1986). Discussion of a Market-based Evaluation of Discretionary Accrual Models. Journal of Accounting Research 34.
  16. Himawan dan Emarila, (2010).“Pengaruh Persepsi Auditor atas Kompetensi, Independensi dan Kualitas Audit terhadap Umur Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) di Jakarta”, Volume 13 Nomor 3.
  17. Hoyle, Eric. (1978). The Role of Teacher. Rotuledge & Kegen Paul, New York.
  18. Indriani, Yohana. (2010). Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor, Corporate Governance, Leverage dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Manajemen Laba. Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang.
  19. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Manajerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4), 305-360.
  20. Jones, J.J. (1991). Earning Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 No. 2: 193-228.
  21. Kurniasih, Margi, (2014). “Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit Tenure, Dan Rotasi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Go Public Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008-2012)”, Skripsi Program Akuntansi UNDIP, Semarang.
  22. Keown, Arthur J. et al, (2010). “Manajemen Keuangan” , PT Indeks, Jakarta.
  23. Marshal, Geiger, and K. Raghunandan. (2002). Going-Concern Opinions in the “New” Legal Environment. American Accounting Association, Accounting Horizons. Vol. 16 No. 1.
  24. Mautz, RK., Ph.d., CPA, Hussein A. Sharaf, Ph.d. (1980). The philosophy of Auditing. Cetakan ke-10. American Accounting Association. Florida. United States of America.
  25. Mgbame, et al. (2012). “Audit Partner Tenure and Audit Quality: An Empirical Analysis.” European Journal of Bussiness and Management, Vol.4, No.7,pp. 154-159.
  26. Myers, J., L., A. Myers, dan T. C. Omer. (2003). “Exploring the term of the auditorclient relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation?”. The Accounting Review (July): pp.779-799.
  27. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008 tentang Jasa Akuntan Publik.
  28. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No.13/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penggunaan Jasa Akuntan Publik dan Kantor Akuntan Publik dalam Kegiatan Jasa Keuangan.
  29. Rahman, A. dan B. Siregar. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15.
  30. Rahmawati, D., dan Winarna, J.. (2002). Peran Pengajaran Auditing terhadap Pengurangan Expectation Gap: Dalam Isu Peran Auditor dan Aturan serta Larangan pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, (7)2.
  31. Reynolds, K.J. and J.R. Francis. (2001). Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-Level Auditor Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3), 375-400.
  32. Scott, William R, (2009). Financial Accounting Theory. Fifth Edition. Canada Prentice Hall.
  33. Sekaran, Uma (2003), Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Aproach, New York-USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  34. Skandal akuntansi sembilan dari sepuluh KAP yang melakukan audit terhadap 36 bank bermasalah antara tahun 1995 hingga 1997 (2001) (Online) tersedia di World Wide Web: http//www.kompas.com//.
  35. St. Pierre, K. and Anderson. J. (1984). An Analysis of Factors Associated with Lawsuits Against Public Accountants. The Accounting Review 59(1), 242-263.
  36. Sugiri, S.,& Febrianto, R., (2011), Does Mandatory Auditor Rotation Increase Audit Quality? A Test of Indonesian Ministry of Finance’s Decree Effectiveness. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 14, Banda Aceh.
  37. Sulistiarini, Sudarno. (2012). "Analisis Faktor-Faktor Pergantian Kantor Akuntan Publik (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2006-2010)". Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, vol. 1 No.2.
  38. Wardhani, Mari. (2010).”Praktik Intellectual Capital Disclosure Perusahaan yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia”. JAAI. 14, (1),71-85
  39. Watts, R. dan Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.