Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 31, 2021
Accepted
March 31, 2021
Published
March 31, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 205 Download : 441

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research to examine the influence of the individual behavior on Government auditors internal unethical of Bengkulu Province. The population of the research is all auditors internal in inspector of Bengkulu Province amounting to 49 people. Analysis of data using analysis linear regression multiple. This study found: 1) the social factor influences of behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province. 2) Moral Reasoning influences behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province. 3) Emotional intelligence not influences behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province. 4) Intelligence spiritual not influences behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province. 5) Equity sensitivity not influence behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province. 6) Commitment Profesional infleunces behavior unethical internal auditors inspector of Bengkulu Province.

Keywords

Social Factors Moral Reasoning Emotional intelligence Spiritual intelligence Equity Sensitivity Profesional Commitment Unethical behavior

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Dinni Fithria, Nurna Aziza, Nila Aprila

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fithria, D., Aziza, N., & Aprila, N. (2021). PENGARUH FAKTOR INDIVIDU TERHADAP PERILAKU TIDAK ETIS AUDITOR INTERNAL PEMERINTAH PROVINSI BENGKULU. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 10(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v10i3.15266
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Brandon, D.M. (2007). The Joint Influence Of Client Attributes And Cognitive Moral Development On Students Ethical
  2. Judgments. Journal of Accounting Education, Ed. 25, Hal. 59-73
  3. Emerson, T & Mckinney, J. (2010). Importance of Religious Beliefs to Ethical Attitudes in Business. Journal of Religion and
  4. Business Ethics, Vol. 1: Issue 2, Article 5,
  5. Faisal & Dyah, S.R. (2007). Pengaruh Komitmen Terhadap Respon Auditor Atas Tekanan Sosial: Sebuah Eksperimen. Jurnal
  6. Akuntansi and Auditing Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia-Yogyakarta, Vol.9 No.l (Juni 2005): 15-
  8. Febrianty. (2012). Pengaruh Gender, Locus Of Control, Intellectual Capital Dan Ethical Sensitivity Terhadap Perilaku Etis
  9. Mahasiswa Akuntansi Pada Perguruan Tinggi, Jurnal Ilmiah Orasi Bisnis, Edisi Ke-IV.
  10. Gaffikin & Lindawati. (2012). The Moral Reasoning of Public Accountants in the Development of a Code of Ethics: the Case of
  11. Indonesia. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance, (Online), Vol.6, No.10,).
  12. Ghozali, I. (2011), Aplikasi Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 19, Semarang, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  13. Huseman, R.C., J.D. Hatfield, E.W. Miles. (1987). A New Perpective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct.
  14. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12: 222-234
  15. Khomsatun, M. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Perkembangan Moral dan Pengalaman Audit terhadap Perilaku Etis Auditor
  16. Inspektorat. Skripsi. Jurusan Akuntansi. Fakultas Ekonomi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  17. Lisda, A. (2009). Pengaruh Kemampuan Intelektual, Kecerdasan Emosional, Dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Perilaku Etis
  18. Auditor Serta Dampaknya Pada Kinerja (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jakarta). Skripsi Jurusan Akuntansi
  19. Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  20. Lucyanda, J., & Endro, G. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Perilaku Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Bakrie,
  21. Media Riset Akuntansi, Vol. 2 No.2: 2088-2106
  22. Mazar, N, O. Amir & D. Ariely. 2008. The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance. Journal of
  23. Marketing Research, No.45 Vol.6, Hal.633-644.
  24. Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996). Audit Time Budget Pressure: Consequence and Antecendents. Accounting, Auditing and
  25. Accountability Journal. Vol. 9 No. 1. pp. 31-58.
  26. Silaban, A. (2009). Perilaku Disfungsional Auditor Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Audit. Disertasi. Semarang: Progam Doktor
  27. Ilmu Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
  28. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfa Beta .
  29. Widiastuti, E & Nugroho, M.A. (2015). Pengaruh Orientasi Etis, Equity Sensitivity , Dan Budaya Jawa Terhadap Perilaku Etis
  30. Auditor Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Nominal / volume IV Nomor 1 / tahun 2015.