Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the significant impact of ERM programme to firm value and its implication for enterprise itself and also the differences of firm value between ERM’s degree of implementation. ur attention in this study on Indonesia’s non-finance enterprise in order to control for differences that might arise from regulatory and characteristic of market differences across industries. Using finance risk as ERM’s proxies, The test was made into 2 phase by include and exclude size as variable control into a model. The result shows that there is positif significant impact of capital risk to firm value and positive significant risk between credit risk and firm value. We also found that there are differences of firm value between We cant prove the impact of foreign exchange risk, and hedging risk to firm value. We also find that contradictive result when sample is divided based the degree of ERM’s implementation. Resulting of the findings, the authors proposes the identification of specific components and processes of ERM that contribute to firm value and evaluation of added benefit of ERM.

Keywords

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Financial Risk Management Firm Value Non-Finance Enterprise.

Article Details

How to Cite
Andina, A. S., Indriani, R., & Suranta, E. (2021). Pengaruh Manajemen Risiko Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 3(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v3i2.15280

References

  1. Accharya, Madhu. 2009. The Influence of Enterprise Risk Management on insurers’ stock market
  2. performance – an event analysis. ERM Symposium. United Kingdom.
  3. Afza Talat dan Atia Alam. 2011. Corporate Derivatives and Foreign Exchange Risk Management.
  4. The Journal of Risk Finance. Vol.12.No.5.2011
  5. Bartram, Shonke M. 2002. Corporate Risk Management as a Lever For Shareholder Value Creation.
  6. www.ssrn.com
  7. Bartram, S. M., Brown, G. W., & Conrad, J. (2009). The effects of derivatives on firm risk and
  8. value(Working paper). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
  9. Benos, A., and Papanastasopoulos (2005). Extending the Merton Model: A Hybrid Approach to
  10. Assessing Credit Quality. Working Paper:University of Piraeus.
  11. Christina, Diane. 12. Kelatahan dalam Penerapan Manajemen Risiko berdasarkan Standar
  12. Internasional. Artikel. Tersedia di www.iknow.html.
  13. Dielman, Terry E. 1991. Applied Regression Analysis for Business and Economics. Boston: PWSKENT Publishing Company.
  14. Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy.Hal. 88
  15. (2): 289-30
  16. Forum for Corporate Governance in Indonesia (FCGI). 2003. Peranan Dewan Komisaris dan Komite
  17. Audit dalam Pelaksanaan Corporate Governance ( Tata Kelola Perusahaan ). Indonesian Company
  18. Law. Available on-line at www.fcgi.or.id.
  19. Fuad. 2005. Simultanitas Dan “Trade-Off” Pengambilan Keputusan Finansial Dalam Mengurangi
  20. Konflik Agensi: Peran Dari Corporate Ownership. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VIII, IAI,
  21. Gubernur Bank Indonesia. Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 8/4/PBI/ 06 tentang Pelaksanaan Good
  22. Corporate Governance bagi Bank Umum. 06.
  23. Halim A dan Hanafi, 2003. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta. UPP. AMP.YKPN.
  24. Hartini, Sri. 2010. Pengaruh Dividen Kas, Arus Kas Bersih, Leverage Ratio Dan Earning Per Share
  25. Terhadap Harga Saham Perusahaan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia.Universitas Sumatera
  26. Utara, Program Pascasarjana. (online),(http://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/20595).
  27. Hartono, Jogiyanto. 2000. Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi. Edisi Kedua.BPFE Yogyakarta.
  28. Herawaty, Vinolla. 2008. Peran Praktek Corporate Governance sebagai Moderating Variable dari
  29. Pengaruh Earnings Management terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol.
  30. , No. 2,Hal. 97-108.
  31. Hoyt, Robert E, dan Dudley L. Moore, Jr. 06. The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence
  32. from the U.S. Insurance Industry. rhoyt@terry.uga.edu.
  33. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.2004. Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Per 1 Oktober 2004. Jakarta: Salemba
  34. Empat.
  35. Isshaq, Zangina. 2009. Corporate Governance governance, ownership structure, cash holding, and
  36. firm value on the Ghana stock Exchange. The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol.10 No.5, Hal. 488-499.
  37. www.emeraldinsight.co.id
  38. Jensen, M.C dan W.H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the Firm. Manager Behaviour Agency Costs and
  39. Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. ,3:24. www.ssrn.com.
  40. Kraus, Verena dan Othmar M.Lehner.2012. The Nexus Of Enterprise Risk Management And Value
  41. Creation: A Systematic Literature Review. ACRN. Journal of Finance and Risk Perspective. Vol.I
  42. Liao, Hsien-hsing dan Tsung-kang Chen, (2005), A Multi-periode Corporate Credit Model—An
  43. Intrinsic Valuation Approach. tersedia di www.defaultrisk.com.
  44. Liebenberg, A. P., & Hoyt, R. E. (2003). The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management :
  45. Evidence From the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers. Risk Management and Insurance Review,
  46. (1): 37-52.
  47. Madura, Jeff.1997. Manajemen Keuangan Internasional, edisi keempat Jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  48. McShane, Michael K, dkk. 2011. Does Enterprise Risk Management Increase Firm Value? Journal of
  49. Accounting, Auditing & Finance.
  50. Midiastuty, Pranata Puspa, dan Machfoedz, M., 03. Analisis Hubungan Mekanisme Corporate
  51. Governance dan Indikasi Manajemen Laba. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VI.
  52. Ng, Tuan Hock dkk. 2010. Firm Size and Risk Taking in Malaysia’s Insurance Industry. The Journal
  53. of Rik Finance Vol.14 No.5.2013.
  54. Nocco, Brian.W dan Rene M.Stultz, 2006. Entreprice Risk Management:Theory and Practice.
  55. www.ssrn.com
  56. Scott, William R. 2000. Financial Accounting Theory. USA : Prentice-Hall.
  57. Siregar, Sheila Ramadhani. 2010. Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Harga Saham
  58. dengan Menggunakan Rasio Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek
  59. Indonesia, Skripsi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
  60. Suwardjono, Teori Akuntansi. 2005. Teori Akuntansi Perekayasaan Pelaporan Keuangan. BPFE
  61. Yogyakarta.
  62. Tahir, Izah Mohd dan Ahmad Rizal Razali. 2011. The Relationship Between Enterprise Risk
  63. Management (ERM) and Firm Value: Evidence from Malaysian Public Listed Companies.
  64. International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences Vol. 1, No. 2, 2011.
  65. Wedari, Linda Kusumaning. 2004. Analisis Pengaruh Proporsi Dewan Komisaris Dan Keberadaan
  66. Komite Audit Terhadap Aktivitas Manajemen Laba. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VII.
  67. Weiying, Jia, dan Chen Baofeng. 2007. The Relationship between Risk Management and Firm
  68. Value. Jiawy 07@yahoo.com.cn