Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 31, 2021
Accepted
March 31, 2021
Published
April 1, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 41 Download : 52

Main Article Content

Abstract

Information technology systems in establishing effective financial management includes budgeting, implementation / Business Management, and reporting and accountability are fast, accurate, and appropriate and in accordance with the regulations, it is necessary efforts to carry out financial management as expected above. Attempts to run the financial management to be effective so as to achieve results quickly, accurately, and proper and in accordance with the regulations can be achieved by the issuance of Regional Management Information System (SIMDA) made by the Financial Supervisory Agency of Finance and Development. This study aims to demonstrate empirically the effect of perceived usefulness on intention to use SIMDA Treasury civil servant in the Government Bengkulu Tengah and to demonstrate empirically the effect of perceived ease of use on intention PNS SIMDA Finance in the Government of Bengkulu Tengah. The research uses primary with in the form of questionnaires. Analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis.From the results of multiple linear regression testing can be concluded that the influence of perception Usefulness (H1) is positive and significant impact on intention to use SIMDA Finance so that the first hypothesis (H1) is accepted and the perceived ease result (H2) significant positive effect on intention to use SIMDA Finance, so The second hypothesis (H2)is accepted.

Keywords

Perception of Usefulness Perceived Ease and Finance SIMDA Bengkulu Tengah

Article Details

How to Cite
Susanti, M., Fadli, F., & Coryanata, I. (2021). SIKAP PNS TERHADAP NIAT MENGGUNAKAN SIMDA KEUANGAN DALAM PROSES PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DI LINGKUNGAN PEMERINTAH BENGKULU TENGAH. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 3(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v3i2.15285
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agarwal, Ritu. (2004). “Individual Acceptance on Information Technologies,”
  2. www.c4ads.seas.gwu.edu/classes/CSci285_Fall_2004/readings/9/required/Agarw al_02.pdf.
  3. Accessed February 11th, 2006.
  4. Bhatti, Tariq. (2007). “Exploring Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Commerce,”
  5. Journal of Internet Banking, Vol.12, No.3, pp.1-13.
  6. Brown, Irwin T.J. (2002). “Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Use of Webbased Learning Technologies in a Developing Country,” The Electronic Journal on Information
  7. Systems in Developing Countries, http://www.ejisdc.org. Accessed February 11th, 2006.
  8. Cazier, Joseph A.; E. Vance Wilson & B. Dawn Medlin. (2007). “The Role of Privacy Risk in IT
  9. Acceptance: An Empirical Study,” International Journal of Information Security and Privacy,
  10. Vol.1, Issue 2, pp.61-73.
  11. Eveleth, Lori Baker; Daniel M. Eveleth; Michele O’Neill & Robert W. Stone. 2006).”Enabling
  12. Laptop Exams Using Secure Software: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of
  13. Information System Education, Vol.17, No.4, pp.413-420.
  14. Gong, Min & Yap Xu. (2004). “An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web- Based
  15. Learning,” Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol.15, No.4, pp.365-374.
  16. Hair, Joseph F.,Jr., William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson & Ronald L.
  17. Tatham.(2006). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
  18. Hall Inc.
  19. Heijden, Hans van der. (2000). “Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Predict Website Usage:
  20. Extension and Empirical Test,” Serie Research Memoranda,
  21. http://dare.ubvu.vu.nl/bitsream/1871/1579/1/20000025.pdf. Accessed February 11th, 2006.
  22. Huang, Zhenyu. (2007).”A comprehensive analysis of US Counties e-government portals:
  23. development status and funtionalitites,” European Journal of Information System, Vol.16, pp.149-
  25. Hubona, Geoffrey S. & Sarah Geitz. (1997). “External Variables, Beliefs, Attitudes and Information
  26. Technology Usage Behavior,” IEEE Computer Society. Ifinedo, Princerly. (2006). “Acceptance
  27. and Continuance Intention of Web-Based- Learning Technologies (WLT) Use Among University
  28. Students in A Baltic Country,” The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing
  29. Countries, http://www.ejisdc.org. Accessed February 11th, 2006.
  30. Jiang, James J., Maxwell K. Hsu, Gary Klein and Binshan Lin. (2000). “E-commerce user behavior
  31. model: an empirical study,” Human Systems Management,Vol.19,pp.265-276.
  32. Jones, Andrew Burton & Geoffrey S. Hubona. (2003). “The Mediation of External Variables in the
  33. Technology Acceptance Model,” Working Paper, Department of Computer Information Systems,
  34. Georgia State University, mis.sauder.ubc.ca/members/burton-jones/PDFs/ABJ-GH-03.pdf.
  35. Accessed February 11th, 2006.
  36. Kwon, Hyosum Stella & Laku Chidambaram. (2000). “A Test of the Technology Acceptance
  37. Model,” csdl.computer.org/como/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/ accessed 11/02/006.
  38. Malhotra, Yogesh & Dennis F. Galletta. (1999). ”Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to
  39. Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation,”
  40. www.brint.org/technologyacceptance.pdf. accessed 11/02/2006