Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
April 1, 2021
Diterima
April 1, 2021
Diterbitkan
April 1, 2021
Unduh
PDF (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 366 Unduh : 1145

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Implementation of the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) become a necessity in the business as a barometer of a company's accountability, while Enterprise Risk Management ERM) is inseparable from the practice of good corporate governance as a whole, which ultimately is expected to create value for the company on an ongoing basis. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the implementation of good corporate governance variables include the independent board, board size, audit committees, and the reputation of auditors and the implementation of ERM on firm value. Sample of this study was selected by exploring purposive sampling method. The sample of this study consists of 20 companies with the observation period of three (3) years (60 observations). The findings of this study showed that the independent board positively and significantly affect firm value. This result indicates that the greater proportion of independent member on board of the company, then the monitoring function could be improved and the lower the likelihood of conflict, so that the company's value increased. This study can not provide an empirical evidence on the impact of the board size and the audit committee on firm value. However, this found the the negative relationship between auditor's reputation and firm value. Interm of ERM, this study ound that there is a postive relationship between ERM implementation and firm value. It means that ERM implementations are used as part of overall corporate strategy, which allows companies to make better decisions and adjusted with acceptable risk, thus ultimately enhance shareholder value.

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Husaini, H., & Rafika, I. (2021). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 4(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v4i1.15298
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Referensi

  1. Aggarwal, R., Kyaw, N., & Zhao, X. (2008). Leverage and Firm Value: A Global Perspective.
  2. Available at: http://www.fma.org/Texas/Papers/ AKZLevnValIntnl_FMA 08.pdf
  3. Anwari, A. (2010). Latar Belakang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko. (Online) (Diakses 8 Januari 2012)
  4. Tersedia di World Wide Web: http://bankirnews.com
  5. Arifin, Z. (2005). Hubungan Antara Corporate Governance dan Variabel Pengurang Masalah Agensi.
  6. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, Vol.1, No.10, pp. 39-55.
  7. Basle Committee on Banking Supervision. (1998). Framework for International Control Systems in
  8. Banking Organisation. Bank for International Settlements. Washington, D.C.
  9. Beasley, M.S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director
  10. Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, Vol. 71, pp. 443-465.
  11. Beiner, S., Drobetz, W., Schmid, F., dan Zimmermann, H. (2003). Is Board Size an Independent
  12. Corporate Governance Mechanism?. (Online) (Diakses 20 Februari 2012) Tersedia di World Wide
  13. Web: http://www.ssrn.com
  14. Bedard, J., and Gendron, Y. 2006. On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness. Accounting
  15. Organizations and Society. Vol. 31. pp. 211-239.
  16. Chi, J. (2005). Understanding the Endogeneity Between Firm Value and Shareholder Rights.
  17. Financial Management, ABI/INFORM Global, 65-76.
  18. Chtourou, S.M., Bedard, J., dan Courteau, L. (2001). Corporate Governance and Earning
  19. Management. (Online) (Diakses 13 Februari 2012) Tersedia di World Wide Web:
  20. http://www.ssrn.com
  21. COSO. (2004). Enterprise Risk Management-Intergrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring
  22. Organizations of the Treadway Commission. New York.
  23. Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., dan Wright, A. (2004). The Corporate Governance Mosaic and
  24. Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 23, pp.87-152.
  25. Defond, M.L., dan Subramanyam, K.R. (1998). Auditor Changes and Discretionary Accruals.
  26. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 35-67.
  27. Desender, K. (2007). On The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation.
  28. Information Resources Management Association Annual Meeting Paper.
  29. De Zoort, T., Hermanson, D., and Reed, S. 2002. Audit committee effectiveness: a synthesis of the
  30. empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature. No. 21. pp 38-76.
  31. Fama, E. F., dan Jensen, M. C. (1983b). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal Of Law and
  32. Economics, Vol.26, No. 2, pp. 301-325.
  33. FCGI. (2001). Peranan Dewan Komisaris dan Komite Audit dalam Pelaksanaan Corporate
  34. Governance (Tata Kelola Perusahaan). Seri Tata Kelola Perusahaan (Corporate Governance), Jilid
  35. II. Jakarta: Citra Graha.
  36. Herawaty, V. (2008). Peran Praktek Corporate Governance Sebagai Moderating Variable dari
  37. Pengaruh Earnings Management Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan,
  38. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 97-108.
  39. Hoyt, R.E., dan Lienberg, A.P. (2006). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the
  40. U.S. Insurance Industry. (Online) (Diakses 01 Januari 2012) Tersedia di World Wed Web:
  41. http://www.ssrn.com
  42. Hoyt, R.E., dan Lienberg, A.P. (2008). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the
  43. U.S. Insurance Industry. (Online) (Diakses 01 Januari 2012) Tersedia di World Wed Web:
  44. http://www.ssrn.com
  45. Husnan, S. (2000). Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Penerapan, Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Akademi
  46. Manajemen Perusahaan YKPN.
  47. Husnan, S. dan Pudjiastuti, E. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi Ketiga.
  48. Yogyakarta: Akademi Manajemen Perusahaan YKPN.
  49. Indrayati, M.R. (2010). Pengaruh Karakteristik Dewan Komisaris Terhadap Tingkat Konservatisme
  50. Akuntansi. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Semarang. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
  51. Jensen, M.C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control
  52. Systems. (Online) (Diakses 5 Februari 2012) Tersedia di World Wide Web: http://www.ssrn.com
  53. Jensen, M.C., dan Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Manajerial Behaviour, Agency Cost,
  54. and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial and Economics, Vol.3, pp. 305-360.
  55. Johnson, V. E., Khurana I. K., dan Reynolds, J. K. (2002). Audit-Firm Tenure and The Quality of
  56. Financial Reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 637–660.
  57. Jones, J.J. (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigation. Journal of Accounting
  58. Research, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 193-228.
  59. Kiymaz, H. (2006), The Impact of Announced Motives, Financial Distress, and Industry Affiliation
  60. on Shareholders' Wealth: Evidence from Large Sell-offs. Quarterly Journal of Business and
  61. Economics, Vol. 45, No. 3-4, pp. 69-89.
  62. KNKG. (2006). Indonesia’s Code of Good Corporate Governance. Komite Nasional Kebijakan
  63. Governance. Jakarta.
  64. Macey, J.R., dan O’Hara, M. (2003). The Corporate Governance of Banks. Federal Reserve Bank of
  65. New York Economic Policy Review, Vol. 9, No.1, pp. 91-107.
  66. Makhdalena. (2007). Peran Komite Audit dalam Pengelolaan Perusahaan. Jurnal Ichsan Gorontalo,
  67. Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 979-985.
  68. Mayangsari, S. (2003). Analisis Pengaruh Independensi, Kualitas Audit, serta Mekanisme Corporate
  69. Governance Terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan. Makalah disajikan pada SNAVI, Surabaya,
  70. -17 Oktober.
  71. Meulbroek, L.K. (2002). Integrated Risk Management for the Firm: A Senior Manager’s Guide.
  72. (Online) (Diakses 09 Februari 2012) Tersedia di World Wide Web: http://papers.ssrn.com
  73. Mohamad, N., & Mohd Saad, N. (2010). Working Capital Management: The Effect of Market
  74. Valuation and Profitability in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(10):
  75. -147.
  76. Nasser, E.M. (2008). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Dewan Komisaris Independen Terhadap
  77. Nilai Perusahaan dengan Manajemen Laba dan Kebijakan Hutang Sebagai Variabel Intervening.
  78. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing dan Informasi, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-27.
  79. Nocco., B. W. and R. Stulz. (2006). Enterprise risk management: Theory and practice. Journal of
  80. Applied Corporate Finance, 18, 4, pp. 8-20.
  81. Naccur, S. B, & Goaied, M. (1999). The Value Creation Process in the Tunisian Stock Exchange.
  82. Proceeding API/WPS9903, Universite de Tunis IH, Faculte des Sciences Economiques et de
  83. Gestion, Tunisia.
  84. Nuryanah, S. (2004). Analisa Hubungan Board Governance dengan Penciptaan Nilai Perusahaan:
  85. Studi Kasus Perusahaan-Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Jakarta.
  86. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
  87. OECD. (2004). Principles of Corporate Governance. Organization for Economic Cooperation and
  88. Development Publication Service. Paris.
  89. O'Keefe, T.B., King, R.D., dan Gaver, K.M. (1994). Audit Fees, Industry Specialization, and
  90. Compliance with GAAS Reporting Standards. Journal of Auditing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 41-55
  91. Ou-Yang, H. (2008). An Empirical Analysis of the Effect Components of the Corporate Governance
  92. Index on Firm Value: Evidence from Taiwan's Financial Industry. The Business Review,
  93. Cambridge, 10: 119-128.
  94. Pagach Don and Richard Warr (2010) The Effects of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance. Jenkins Graduate School of Management North Carolina State University. Working
  95. paper.
  96. Peraturan Bank Indonesia. (2003). No. 5/8/PBI/2003 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi
  97. Bank Umum. Jakarta. Bank Indonesia.
  98. Peraturan Bank Indonesia. (2006). No. 8/14/PBI/2006 tentang Pelaksanaan GCG Bagi Bank Umum.
  99. Jakarta. Bank Indonesia.
  100. Peraturan Bank Indonesia. (2009). No. 11/25/PBI/2009 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Bagi
  101. Bank Umum. Jakarta. Bank Indonesia.
  102. Rahayu, S. (2010). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan dengan Pengungkapan
  103. Corporate Social Responsibility dan Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi
  104. (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Jakarta). Skripsi tidak
  105. dipublikasikan. Semarang. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
  106. Ramaniya, G. (2005). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Imbal Hasil Saham. Skripsi tidak
  107. dipublikasikan. Jakarta. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
  108. Sandra, D., dan Kusuma, I.W. (2004). Reaksi Pasar Terhadap Tindakan Perataan Laba dengan
  109. Kualitas Auditor dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Makalah disajikan
  110. pada SNA VII, Denpasar, 2-3 Desember.
  111. Sari, I. (2010). Pengaruh Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perbankan
  112. Nasional (Studi pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode
  113. -2008). Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Semarang. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro.
  114. Sharma, A. K. (2006). Financial Leverage and Firm's Value A Study of Capital Structure of Selected
  115. Manufacturing Sector Firms in India. The Business Review. Cambridge. ABI/INFORM Global,
  116. -76.
  117. Siallagan, H., dan Machfoedz, M. J. (2006). Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Kualitas Laba, dan
  118. Nilai Perusahaan. Makalah disajikan pada SNA IX, Padang, 23-26 Agustus.
  119. Sutawinangun, N. M. (2003). Manajemen Risiko dalam Corporate Governance. Forum for Corporate
  120. Governance in Indonesia (FCGI).
  121. Stulz, R. (1996). Rethinking risk management, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9, 3, 8-24.
  122. Stulz, R. (2003). Rethinking risk management, The Revolution in Corporate Finance, 4th Edition,
  123. Blackwell Publishing, 367-384.
  124. Tahir, Izad Mohd., & Ahmad Rizal Razali. 2011. The Relationship Between Enterprise Risk
  125. Management (ERM) And Firm Value: Evidence From Malaysia Public Listed Companies.
  126. International Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol 1, No. 2.
  127. Tampubolon, R. (2004). Risk Management (Manajemen Risiko): Pendekatan Kualitatif untuk Bank
  128. Komersial. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  129. Thompson, R.S. (1984). Diversification Strategy and Systematic Risk: an Empirical Inquiry.
  130. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 5, No.2, pp. 98-103.
  131. Tseng, C.Y. (2007). Internal Control, Enterprise Risk Management, and Firm Performance. Doctoral
  132. Thesis of University of Maryland. Baltimore.
  133. Waweru, N., dan Kisaka, E.S. (2011). The Effect of Enterprise Risk Management Implementation on
  134. the Value of Companies Listed in the Nairobi Stock Exchange. (Online) (Diakses 01 Januari 2012)
  135. Tersedia di World Wide Web: http://www.ssrn.com
  136. Wijayanto, A., Rahmawati, dan Suparno, Y. (2007). Pengaruh Asimetri Informasi Terhadap
  137. Hubungan Antara Penerapan Sistem Perdagangan Dua Papan di Bursa Efek Jakarta dan Indikasi
  138. Manajemen Laba Pada Perusahaan Perbankan. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol. 09, No. 02, pp.
  139. -175.
  140. World Bank. (1998). Global Development Finance. Washington, D.C.