Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 1, 2021
Accepted
April 1, 2021
Published
April 1, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 69 Download : 98

Main Article Content

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine increasing in the market competition about the application of manufacturing technology, deregulation of economies and privatization of government owned enterprises makes decision makers to be management accounting system (SAM) information more important. This research reports the results of a study which offers an explaination for the relationship between intensity of market competition and business unit performance by incorporating into the model the use of managent accounting systems information by managers as moderating variable. To asses the relationship, data were colleced from 87 enterprises in service. The result of this research indicate that the intensity of market competition is a determinant of the use of the information MAS which, in turn, is a determinant plays a mediating role in the relationship between the intensity of market competition and business unit performance. An interpretation of the result is that those organizatations which use the information can effectively face competition in the market and thereby improve performance.

Keywords

technology be management accounting system informatiointensity of market competition and business unit performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Coryanata, I. (2021). PENGARUH VERABEL MODERATING PENGGUNAAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI DAN SISTEM AKUNTANSI MANAJEMEN TERHADAP HUBUNGAN ANTARA INTENSITAS PERSAINGAN PASAR DAN KINERJA PERUSAHAAN. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 5(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v5i2.15309
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Barney, J.B. dan E. J. Zajac, 1994., “Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an
  2. Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage”. Strategic Management
  3. Journal, Winter Special Issue, 15.
  4. Bromwich, M., 1990, “The Case for Strategic Management Accounting Sistem : The Role of
  5. Accounting Information for Strategy in Competitive Markets”, Accounting,
  6. Organization and Society, 15.
  7. Day, G. S., 1991. “Learning About Markets”. Report No. 91-117. Cambridge, Marketing Science
  8. Institute
  9. Dharmmesta, B.S, 1999, “Riset Konsumen dalam Pengembangan Teori Perilaku Konsumen dan
  10. Masa Depan”, Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, vol. VI. No.1.
  11. Drucker, P. F. 1996, “The Executive in Action”: Managing for Results. Innovation and
  12. Enterpreneurship, The Effective. New York.
  13. Foster, G. and Gupta, M, 1994., “Marketing, cost management and management accounting”,
  14. Journal of Management Accounting Research..
  15. George Stalk, Phlip Evans dan Lawrence E. Shulman, 1992, “Competing on Capabilities: The
  16. New Rules of Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review.
  17. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., & Black, W.C, 1998., Multivariate Analysis 5th ed. Printice Hall
  18. International, Inc.
  19. Hax, A. C dan N.S. Majluf. 1996., The Strategy : Concept and Process, A Pragmatic Approach.
  20. Edisi kedua. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc .
  21. Hermawan Kartajaya dkk, 1998, “Consumer Behavior in the Economic Crisis and its Implication
  22. for Marketing Strategy”, Kelola, no. 18. Ed. VIII.
  23. Ietje Nazaruddin, 1998, “Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Karakterstik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi
  24. Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial”, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia.
  25. Ikhsan, Arfan dan Rasdianto, 2005, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Dalam
  26. Hubungan Antara Intensitas Persaingan Pasar Terhadap Kinerja Unit Perusahaan”,
  27. Seminar Nasional Akuntansi 8, Solo.
  28. Imam Ghozali. 2001., Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Edisi pertama,
  29. Program Studi Magister Akuntansi, Badan Penerbit,Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP),
  30. Semarang.
  31. Kohli, A. J. And Jawoski, B. J., 1990, “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions,
  32. And Managerial Implication”. Journal Of Marketing.
  33. Mia And Clarke, 1999, “Market Competition, Use of Information Management Accunting Sistem,
  34. Performance Unit Business”. Management Accounting Research.
  35. Muslichah, 2002, “Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi, Saling Ketergantungan, Karakteristik Sistem
  36. Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial”, Proceeding SNA 5 Undip.
  37. Pogue, G.A., 1990, “Strategic Management Accounting and Marketing Strategy”, Management
  38. Accounting.
  39. Rolfe, A. J., 1992, “Profitability Exporting Techniques Bridge Information Gap”, The Journal Of
  40. Business Strategy.
  41. Santoso, Singgih, 2001, Mengolah Data Statistik Secara Profesional, Penerbit PT Elex Media
  42. Komputindo, Jakarta.
  43. Senge, P.M., 1990, “The Leader’s New York : Building Learning Organizations”, Sloan
  44. Management Review.
  45. Sekaran, Uma., 2000, “Research Methods for Business”, John Wisley.
  46. Ward, K., 1993, “Accounting For a Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Management
  47. Accounting