Main Article Content

Abstract

In 2009 dewa carambola was inaugurated as an icon of Depok City. This is because Depok City contributes quite a lot of carambola production in West Java Province. Sawangan sub-district was chosen as the research location because it is one of the centers for carambola production in Depok City. The occurrence of land-use change, the price of production inputs is increasingly high, and PDO (Plant Disturbing Organisms) are problems in the farming activities of the dewa carambola in Sawangan District. This study aimed to determine carambola farming characteristics and income analysis in the Sawangan District. Respondents were determined purposively with 30 farmers using the Slovin formula. In this study, the characteristics of the farm are described descriptively, and the analysis of farm income uses the R/C ratio analysis. The analysis results show that the total cost per hectare per year of carambola farming in Sawangan District is IDR 29,147,430,444. The result is the sum of the cash costs of IDR 20,644,741,935 per hectare per year and the calculated costs of IDR 8,502,688,508 per hectare per year. The highest cash costs incurred were wages for non-family labor (TKLK) of IDR 7,288,709,677/ha/yr. Meanwhile, the highest calculated cost is the TKDK fee of 65.90%, or around IDR 5,668,548,387 per hectare per year. Meanwhile, the income for carambola farming in Sawangan sub-district for cash costs is IDR 13,125,677,419 per hectare and the value of income for total costs is IDR 4,622,988,911 per hectare. The analysis results of the R/C ratio of cash costs are 1.63 and the R/C ratio of total costs is 1.15. So it can be said that carambola farming in Sawangan District is efficient or feasible to cultivate.

Keywords

Dewa Carambola Characteristics Income R/C ratio

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmadona, L., & Devitasari, F. (2022). INCOME ANALYSIS OF DEWA CARAMBOLA FARMING IN SAWANGAN SUBDISTRICT, DEPOK CITY, WEST JAVA. Journal of Agri Socio Economics and Business, 4(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.31186/jaseb.4.1.57-68

References

  1. Assis, K., Nurrul Azzah, Z & Mohammad Amizi. 2014. Relationship Between
  2. Socioeconomic Factors, Income And Productivity Of Farmers : A Case
  3. Study On Pineapple Farmers. International Journal of Research in
  4. Humanities, Arts and Literature.
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Triwulanan 2016 – 2020. Statistik Produk Domestik Bruto.
  6. Indonesia Triwulanan [internet]. [diunduh 5 Desember 2020]. Tersedia pada
  7. https://.bps.go.id.
  8. Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura. 2015. Rencana Strategis Direktorat Jenderal
  9. Hortikultura 2015 – 2019. Tersedia pada : http://hortikultura.pertanian.go.id/.
  10. [diunduh pada 9 Desember 2020]
  11. Direktorat Jenderal Hortikultura. 2015. Statistik Produksi Hortikultura Tahun
  12. Tersedia pada : http://hortikultura.pertanian.go.id/ [diunduh pada 10
  13. Desember 2020]
  14. Soekartawi. 2016. Analisis Usahatani. UI Press. Jakarta.
  15. Sugiyono. (2012). Teknik pengambilan sampel purposive adalah teknik penentuan
  16. sampel dengan pertimbangan tertentu. Dalam penelitian ini peneliti akan
  17. menetapkan beberapa kriteria sampel.
  18. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif,
  19. dan R&D. Alfabeta; Bandung.
  20. Syafruddin, et al. 2003. Potensi dan kesesuaian lahan untuk pengembangan pakan
  21. ruminansia di lembah Palu. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi
  22. Peternakan dan Veteriner. Bogor,
  23. Thamrin, Muhammad., Ainul Mardhiyah dan Samsul Efendi Marpaung. 2013. Analisis Usahatani Ubi Kayu (Manihot utilissima). Jurnal Agrium, Vol. 18 (1): 57 – 63.