Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 2, 2020
Accepted
February 29, 2020
Published
March 3, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 297 Download : 161

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study deals with online teaching by using ICT in teaching writing skill. This study aimed in investigating the activity of the teacher, the teacher’s perception, and students’ perception to the process of teaching online by means of slack application in students writing skill. A qualitative design with a case study approach was employed in this study by conducting classroom observations and interviews to collect the data regarding the use and the impact of slack application in teaching writing by the teachers in EFL classrooms. The participant of this study were the students at one of senior high school in Tasikmalaya. In analyzing the data, multiple sources of data collection commonly known as triangulation as purposed was employed. The findings showed that the teacher used four steps in optimizing slack application in an online teaching writing. Introducing, memorizing and giving feedback were the strategy in teaching online by using slack application in classroom. This study suggested that English teacher need to apply Online Application as a system and tools to support the teacher in how they give a task, planning, and empowering in their teaching practices.

Keywords

Online Teaching Online Application Information and Communication of Technology (ICT) Slack Application Writing.

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Heryandi, Y., Said, I., & Herlina, R. (2020). Online Teaching in Writing by Means of Slack Application. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.1.49-68
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agca, R. K., & Ozdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. ELSEVIER, 83, 781 – 785
  2. Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor’s and Master’s thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276–297.
  3. Amin, S. N. (2013). An effective use of ICT for education and learning by drawing on worldwide knowledge, research and experience: ICT as a change agent for education. Scholarly Journal of Education, 2(4), 38-45.
  4. Atai, M. R., & Alipour, M. (2011). The effect of the combination of small group conferencing and portfolio procedure on EFL students' writing accuracy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(6), 97-112.
  5. Azmi, N. (2017). The benefits of using ICT in the EFL classroom: From perceived utility to potential challenges. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 111-118.
  6. Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Faris, N. S. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Longman Inc.
  8. Cakici, D. The use of ICT in teaching English as a foreign language. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 4(2). 73-77.
  9. Cakir, I. (2006). The use of video as an audio-visaual material in foreign language teaching classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , 5(4), 67-71.
  10. Cao, Y., Ajjan, H., & Hong, P. (2013). Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 581-593
  11. Clark, R. C, & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and The Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th Ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th Ed). London: Routledge Falmer.
  13. Coll, R. K., & Chapman, R. (2006). Qualitative or quantitative?. Choice of methodology for cooperative education researchers. Journal of Cooperative Education, 35(1), 25-35.
  14. Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73-99.
  15. Coombs, N. (2010). Making online teaching accessible. Inclusive course design for students with disabilities. New York: PB Printing.
  16. Cowie, B. & Jones, A. (2009). Teaching and learning in the ICT environment. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.) International Handbook of Research on Teachers and Teaching: Part One (pp. 791-801). New York: Springer.
  17. Daniels, E. (2011). Creating motivating learning environments: Teachers matter. Middle School Journal. 43(2), 32-37.
  18. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied lingusitics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
  20. Farrukh, S., and Singh, S. P. (2014). Teachers Attitude towards Use of ICT in Technical and Non-Technical Institutes. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(7), 153-160.
  21. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in school. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.
  23. Gofine, M., & Clark, S. (2017). Integration of slack, a cloud-based team collaboration application, into research coordination. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, 24(2), 252–254.
  24. Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326.
  25. Hancock, B. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. Nothingham University: Trent Focus Research.
  26. Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of english language teaching (4th ed.). Malayasia: Pearson Education Limited.
  27. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55
  28. Hsu, L., & Sheu, C. M. (2008). A study of low English proficiency students’ attitude toward online learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 5(2), 240–264.
  29. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: US: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Iqba, Z., Ali, M. Q., Nargis, N., & Yasmeen, R. (2015). ICT use for effective teaching-learning process in secondary schools in Punjab Province. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(3), 138-143.
  31. Jayanthi, N. S., & Kumar, R. V. (2016). Use of ICT in English language teaching and learning. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 34-38.
  32. Joyes, G., & Chen, Z. (2006). Developing teacher autonomy and reflective practice through an online teacher education course. The Journal of Asia TEFL. 3(4), 1-8
  33. Ke, I. C., & Suzuki, T. (2011). Teaching global English with NNS-NNS online communication. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(2), 169-188.
  34. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Network based language teaching: Concept and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Khodadady, E., & Khodabakhshzade, H. (2012). The effect of portfolio and self-assessment on writing ability and autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 518-524.
  36. Lehman, R. M., & Conceicao, S. C. O. (2010). Creating a sense of presence in online teaching: How “to be there” for distance leaners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  37. Macia, et.al. (2006). Information technology in language for specific purposes. New York: Springer.
  38. Malik, R. S., & Hamied, F. A. (2016). Research methods: A guide for first time researchers (2nd ed.). Bandung: UPI Press.
  39. Mbangwana, M. A. (2008). Introduction of ICT in schools and classrooms in Cameroon. In K. Toure, T.M.S. Tchombe, & T. Karsenti (Eds.). ICT and Changing Mindsets in Education, Bamenda, Cameroon: Langaa; Bamako, Mali: ERNWACA / ROCARE
  40. Meenakshi. (2013). Importance of ICT in education. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(4), 3-8.
  41. Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. In J. Bass (Ed.), San Francisco: CA.
  42. Noor, N. M., Aman, I., Mustaffa, R., & Seong, T. K. (2010). Teacher’s verbal feedback on students’ response: A Malaysian ESL classroom discourse analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 398-405. https://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.054
  43. Pekosz, et.al, (2015). Application of ICT tools in enhancing education in information society. Proceedings: 9th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation (pp. 160-169). ECIME 2015, Bristol: UK.
  44. Perkel, J.M. (2017). How scientists use Slack. Nature, 541, 123–124
  45. Print, M. (1993). Curriculum development and design. Malaysia: SRM Production Sevices Sdn Bhd.
  46. Ramezani, M., Kaffash, H., Kargiban, Z., & Kargiba. (2010). A close look into role of ict in education. International Journal of Instruction, 3(2), 63-82.
  47. Rashidi, & Rafieerad, M. (2010). Analyzing patterns of classroom interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(3), 93-120.
  48. Rhodes, T. L. (2011). Making learning visible and meaningful through electronic portfolios. Routledge, 43(1), 6-13.
  49. Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., & Dombrovskaia, L. (2012). ICT for education: A conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of technology-enhanced learning environments in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 291-315.
  50. Romova, Z., & Andrew, M. (2011). Teaching and assessing academic writing via the portfolio: Benefits for learners of English as an additional language. ELSEVIER, 16, 111-122.
  51. Saondi, O., & Suherman, A. (2012). Etika profesi keguruan. Indonesia: Redaksi Refika
  52. Seng, K. T., & Choo, L. S. (2008). Information Communication Technology in Education. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
  53. Shahsavar, Z., & Hoon, T. B. (2010). Using weblogs to promote critical thinking through asynchronous online discussion. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 309-331.
  54. Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electronic literacy skills in an online language learning community. Routledge: Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 327-345.
  55. Smith, K. (2000): Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: Rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 73-102.
  56. Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: London: The Guilford Press.
  57. Tabatabaei, O., & Assefi, F. (2012). The Effect of portfolio assessment technique on writing performance of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 138-147.
  58. Taselin, M. (2010). The Teacching of English Language Skills and English Language Components. Malang: State University of Malang Press.
  59. Taylor, R., King, F. & Nelson, G. (2012). Student learning through social media. Journal of Sociological Research, 3(2), 29-35.
  60. Uluyol, C., & ?ahin, S. (2016). Elementary school teachers' ICT use in the classroom and their motivators for using ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 65-75.
  61. Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse language in action. New York: Routledge.
  62. Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Zhao, J. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 95-104.
  63. Williams, R.T., and Lutes, P. (2013). Using video in the ESL classroom. Cambridge Journal of Education 34(3), 331-351
  64. Yang, C., & Chang, Y. (2012). Assessing the effects of interactive blogging on student attitudes towards peer interaction, learning motivation, and academic achievements. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(2), 126-135. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00423
  65. Yastibas, A. E., & Yastibas, G. C. (2015). The use of e-portfolio-based assessment to develop students’ self-regulated learning in English language teaching. ELSEVIER: Social and Behavioral Sciences 176 (2015) 3-13.