Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 9, 2020
Accepted
April 4, 2021
Published
June 15, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 137 Download : 251

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

[EFFECT OF FLY ASH APPLICATION FROM POWER PLANT OF PT. GREAT GIANT PINEAPPLE ON SOIL BIOLOGYCAL ACTIVTY IN MARGINAL LAND]. Fly ash is a coal combustion waste containing nutrients that can be used to improve the soil fertility. The waste continues to increase but its handling is still limited because it is still classified as hazardous and toxic waste (B3). This study aims to determine the soil biological activity due to the application of fly ash and cow manure on marginal soils. The study was conducted using a completely randomized block design arranged factorial. The first factor is the dosage level of fly ash (F), namely 0 g/pot (0 ton/ha), 75 g/pot (50 ton/ha), 150 g/pot (100 ton/ha), and 225 g/pot (150 ton/ha) and the second factor is the dose of cow manure with three levels, namely 15 g/pot (10 ton/ha), 30 g/pot (20 ton/ha), and 45 g/pot (30 ton/ha). The observation parameters were (total population of fungi, bacteria, and soil respiration). The results showed that the addition of fly ash at various doses affected the soil biological activity by increasing the population of fungi, bacteria and soil respiration. The highest population of microorganisms was fungi, which was 17.8 x 107 Log CFU/g, bacteria 13.7 x 105 Log CFU/g, while the highest soil respiration was 54.53 mg CO2 at a dose of 100 ton/ha fly ash. In addition, the application of cow manure at a dose of 10, 20, 30 ton/ha  did not affect observed variables.

 

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Nurleni Kurniawati, STIPER Dharma Wacana

Agrotechnology
How to Cite
Kurniawati, N., & Priyadi, P. (2021). DAMPAK APLIKASI FLY ASH DARI PEMBANGKIT LISTRIK DI PT. GREAT GIANT PINEAPPLE-LAMPUNG TERHADAP AKTIVITAS BIOLOGI TANAH DI LAHAN MARGINAL. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 23(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.31186/jipi.23.1.9-14
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aggarwal, S., Singh, G. R. & Yadav, B. R. (2009). Utilization of fly ash for crop production?: effect on the growth of wheat and sorghum crops and soil properties. Journal of Agricultural Physics, 9, 20–23.
  2. Anderson, T. & Domsch, K. (1993). The metabolic quotient for CO2 ( q CO2 ) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as ph, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25(3), 393–395.
  3. Arthur, M. F., Zwick, T. C., Tolle, D. A. & Voris, P. Van. (1984). Effects of fly ash on microbial C02 evolution from an agricultural soil. 22, 209–211.
  4. Basu, M., Pande, M., Bhadoria, P. B. S. & Mahapatra, S. C. (2009). Potential fly-ash utilization in agriculture: A global review. Progress in Natural Science,19(10),1173–1186.DOI:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.006.
  5. Chetstowski, A., Chieko, Z. & Borowik, A. (2014). Effect of coal ash on the microbial and enzymatic activity in soil. Agroekologia-Artyku, 2, 32–36.
  6. Das, S., Jeong, S. T., Das, S., Kim, P. J. & Norton, J. M. (2017). Composted cattle manure increases microbial activity and soil fertility more than composted swine manure in a submerged rice paddy. Front. Microbiol, 8, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01702.
  7. Dijkstra, F. A., Bader, N. E., Johnson, D. W. & Cheng, W. (2009). Soil biology & biochemistry does accelerated soil organic matter decomposition in the presence of plants increase plant N availability?. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(6), 1080–1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.02.013.
  8. Gaind, S. & Gaur, A. C. (2004). Evaluation of fly ash as a carrier for diazotrophs and phosphobacteria. Bioresource Technology, 95(2), 187–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.014.
  9. Geoffrey, M. . (2010). Metals, minerals and microbes?: geomicrobiology and bioremediation. Microbiology, 156, 609–643. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.037143-0.
  10. Idham, Sudiarso, Aini, N. & Nuraini, Y. (2016). Isolation and identification on microorganism decomposers of Palu local cow manure of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. J.Degrade.Min. Land Manage, 3(4), 625–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2016.034.625.
  11. Kementrian LHK. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Penyimpanan Limbah Bahan Berbahaya Dan Beracun. 1–52. http://jdih.menlhk.co.id/uploads/files/P_12_2020_ PENYIMPANAN_ LIMBAH_ B3_menlhk_06262020092441.pdf
  12. Kishor, P., Ghosh, A. & Kumar, D. (2010). Use of flyash in agriculturae: a way to improve soil fertility and its productivity. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(1), 1–14.
  13. Kohli, S. & Goyal, D. (2010). Effect of fly ash application on some soil physical properties and microbial activities. Acta Agrophysica, 16(2), 327–335.
  14. Makut, M. & Ade-ibijola, O. (2012). Citric acid producing fungi found in the soil environment of Keffi metropolis, Nasarawa State. International Research Journal of Microbiology, 3(7), 240–245.
  15. Page, A., Elseewi, A. A. & Straughan, I. R. (1979). Physical and chemical properties of fly ash from coal-fired power plants with reference to environmental impacts. Residue Reviews, 71, 83–120.
  16. Pal, A. & Paul, A. K. (2008). Microbial extracellular polymeric substances?: central elements in heavy metal bioremediation. Indian J Microbiol, 48, 49–64.
  17. Pati, S. S. & Sahu, S. K. (2004). CO2 evolution and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, protease and amylase) of fly ash amended soil in the presence and absence of earthworms (Drawida willsi Michaelsen) under laboratory conditions. Geoderma, 118, 289–301.
  18. Priyadi, Kurniawati, N. & Nugroho, P. (2018). Aktivitas biologi tanah yang berasal dari perkebunan karet pada berbagai kondisi kelengasan. EnviScience, 2(1), 10–15.
  19. Schutter, M. & Fuhrmann, J. (2001). Soil microbial community responses to fly ash amendment as revealed by analyses of whole soils and bacterial isolates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33(14), 1947–1958.
  20. Sharma, S. K. & Kalra, N. (2006). Effect of flyash incorporation on soil properties and productivity of crops?: A review aspects of flyash for its application in agriculture. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 65(5), 383–390.
  21. Shrivastava, H., Mahish, P.K Anjali, G. (2018). Effect of industrial fly ash on the growth of some crop field soil fungi adapted with ash content. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 11(1), 203–207.
  22. Surridge, A.K., van der Merwe, A. & Kruger, R. (2009). Preliminary microbial studies on the impact of plants and South African fly ash on amelioration of crude oil polluted acid soils . World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, 1.
  23. Wicaksono, T., Sagiman, S. & Umran, I. (2015). Kajian Aktivitas Mikroorganisme Tanah Pada Beberapa Cara Penggunaan Lahan di Desa Pal IX Kecamatan Sungai Kakap Kabupaten Kuburaya.