Main Article Content

Abstract

Performance Measurement System (PMS) including Performance Accountability is the obligation of every institution to be implemented accurately and measurably. Government AgencAy Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) which has been regulated in PP no. 29 of 2014 contains regulations of the President of the Republic of Indonesia regarding general regulations for the implementation of SAKIP. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the PMS factors on the implementation of SAKIP in the Jambi provincial government by connecting the 5 factors of the PMS and the implementation of SAKIP that influenced them. Specifically, the objects or parts of local government organizations that can explain this problem are the existing agencies, agencies and bureaus or regional apparatus organizations that are under the auspices of the provincial government. The research method used is descriptive quantitative. The warp Partial Least Square (warpPLS) program is a variance-based data processing program created to solve the problems caused by covariance-based SEM. This study hypothesizes the influence of the PMS factors on the implementation of SAKIP. The activities carried out began with submitting proposals to the Jambi provincial government, which then sought data directly or through third parties. Students as enumerators are used to search for data in the field. Primary data used comes from provincial government officials, while secondary data is obtained using the services of parties who are not directly involved with Jambi provincial government policies. The research was conducted by directly observing the Jambi governor's office and was also carried out using only information technology via the internet network. So that the information obtained does come from data sources that are truly valid, reliable and trustworthy.

Keywords

Implementation performance measurement institutional theory SAKIP

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Gowon, Jambi University

I will revise m proposal then..

How to Cite
Gowon, M., Yuliusman, Y., & Fortunasari, F. (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SAKIP IN THE JAMBI PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.2.93-104

References

  1. Adeoye, A. O., dan A. F. Elegunde. 2012. "Impacts of External Business Environment on Organisational Performance in the Food and Beverage Industry in Nigeria".
  2. Ahyaruddin, M., dan R. Akbar. 2016. "The Relationship between the Use of PMS, organizational factors, accountability, and performance of Public Sector Organizations". Journal of Indonesia Economy and Business, Vol. 31.
  3. ———. 2017. "Akuntabilitas dan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah: Semu atau Nyata". Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, Vol. 21 (2) Desember.
  4. Akbar, R. 2011. "Performance Measurement and Accountability in Indonesian Local Government", School of Accounting, Curtin University, Australia.
  5. Akbar, R., R. Pilcher, dan B. Perrin. 2012. "Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government". Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, hlm: 262-291.
  6. Anderson, S. W., dan S. M. Young. 1999. "The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems ".
  7. Carpenter, V. L., dan E. H. Feroz. 2001. "Institutional teory & accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state goverments" decisions to adopt GAAP". Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26.
  8. Cavalluzzo, K. S., dan C. D. Ittner. 2004. "Implementing Performance Measurement innovations: evidence from government". accounting organizations and society, Vol. 29 (2004).
  9. Cooper, D. 2006. "The Impact of Management's Commitment on Employee Behaviour: a Field Study". American Society of Safety Engineers, Vol. March 18-22, 2006.
  10. Denison, D. R., dan A. K. Mishra. 1995. Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness: Organization Science.
  11. DiMaggio, P. J., dan W. W. Powell. 1983. "Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields". American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, hlm: 147-160.
  12. Ferdinand, A. 2011. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. T. D. i. M. Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi. Semarang: BP. UNDIP.
  13. Ghozali, I. 2011. Ekonometrika, Teori, konsep & aplikasi dgn SPSS 17. c. ke-2. Semarang: badan penerbit undip.
  14. ———. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dgn SPSS 21. c. ke-7. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.
  15. Ghozali, I., dan H. Latan. 2017. Partial Least Square; Konsep, Metode dan Aplikasi. p. w. 5.00. Semarang: BP Undip.
  16. Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, dan R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  17. Hoque, Z. 2004. "A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: impact on organizational performance". International Business Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, hlm: 485-502.
  18. Indriantoro, N., dan B. Supomo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. second edition ed. Jogjakarta: BPFE UGM.
  19. Keathley, H., dan E. V. Aken. 2014. "Performance Measurement System Implementation: Meta-Evaluation of Literature on Success Factors". Artikel dipresentasikan pada Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference.
  20. Latan, H., dan I. Ghozali. 2017. Partial Least Squares; Konsep, Metode dan Aplikasi. m. p. w. 5.0. Semarang: BP Undip.
  21. Lawrence, T. B., dan M. Shadnam. 2008. "Institutional Theory". Pada The International Encyclopedia of Communication, diedit oleh W. Donsbach. USA, UK, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
  22. March, J. G., dan J. P. Olsen. 1984. "The New Institutionalism: Oragnizational Factors in Political Life". The American Political Sciense Review, Vol. 78, no. 3, No. September, hlm: 734-749.
  23. Marzuki, P. M. 2010. Fungsi BPK Dalam Pengawasan Pengelolaan dan Pertanggungjawaban Keuangan Negara Dalam Perspektif Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. In Iskandar Zulkarnain Blog. Jakarta: Keuangan Negara.
  24. Negara, L. A. 1999. Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, edited by LAN. Jakarta.
  25. ———. 2003. Perbaikan Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan AKIP. Jakarta
  26. Nugraha, H. 2014. "Pengaruh Sistem Pengukuran KInerja terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Manajerial dengan intermediasi Audit Intern, Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah dan Akuntabilitas Kinerja", Program Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi, Diponegoro, Semarang.
  27. Nurkhamid, M. 2008. "Implementasi Inovasi SPK Instansi Pemerintah". Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, Vol. 3 no.1.
  28. Pemerintah. 2006. Peraturan Pemerintah No. 8 tentang Pelaporan Keuangan & Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
  29. Presiden. 2006. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, edited by M. H. d. H. A. Manusia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
  30. ———. 2014. Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). In Peraturan Presiden no. 29, edited by P. RI. Jakarta.
  31. Primarisanti, H., dan R. Akbar. 2015. "Factors Influencing the Success of Performance Measurement: Evidence from Local Government". Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, Vol. 30, Number 1, 2015, No., hlm: 56 – 71.
  32. Schumacker, R. E., dan R. G. Lomax. 2010. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling: Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  33. Scott, W. R. 2004. Institutional theory.
  34. Selznick, P. 1948. "Foundations of the Theory Organization". American Sociological Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, hlm: 25-35.
  35. Shahzad, F., dan R. A. Luqman. 2012. Impact of Organizational Culture on Organizational Performance: An Overview. In Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business. Pakistan: Institute of Interdisciplinary Business Research.
  36. Sofyani, H., R. Akbar, dan R. C. Ferrer. 2018. "20 years of PMS Implementation in Indonesian Local Governments: Why is Their Performance Still Poor?". Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, Vol. 11.
  37. Spekléa, R. F., dan F. H. M. Verbeeten. 2014. The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance: Management Accounting Research 131–146.
  38. Syachbrani, W., dan R. Akbar. 2013. Faktor-Faktor Teknis dan Keorganisasian yang Memengaruhi Pengembangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah. Jogjakarta: Jurnal Review Akuntansi dan Keuangan FEB UGM.
  39. Zehir, C., Ö. G. Ertosun, S. Zehir, dan B. Müceldili. 2011. The Effects of Leadership Styles and Organizational Culture over Firm Performance: Multi-National Companies in Istambul: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.