Main Article Content

Abstract

The research objective was to see the effect of the information system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use on user satisfaction of the SI APIK application. The study population was Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise (MSME) that had attended training on compiling Android-based financial reports. The study sample that included 32 respondents were determined using the census method. The sample collection was carried out by means of a questionnaire to the respondents. The results showed that quality of information systems has no significant effect on user satisfaction of SI APIK application, quality information has no significant effect on user satisfaction of SI APIK application, perceived usefulness is significant on user satisfaction of SI APIK application, perceived ease of use has no significant effect on user satisfaction of SI APIK application, quality of information systems, quality information, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use simultaneously affect user satisfaction of SI APIK application

Keywords

Quality of Information Systems Quality Information Perceived Usefulness Perceived Ease of Use User Satisfaction

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahmana, Y., & Indriani, M. (2022). SI APIK Application User Satisfaction with The TAM and Delone and Mclean Approach: An Empirical Study on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) in Banda Aceh. Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.12.1.23-36

References

  1. Adhiputra, M. W. (2015). Aplikasi Technology Acceptance Model terhadap pengguna layanan internet banking. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Komunikasi, 2(1), 52–63.
  2. Amalia, S. M., & Pratomo, D. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem Informasi, Kualitas Informasi, Dan Perceived Usefulness Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Pada Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Di Rumah Sakit Mata Cicendo Bandung). EProceedings of Management, 3(2). DOI: http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jrmsi/article/view/9183
  3. Anjilni, R. Q. (2020). Membumikan SAK-EMKM Lewat SI APIK BI. Kompasiana.Com.
  4. Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. w. (1983). Development of a Tool for Measuring and AnalizingComputer User Satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  5. Bodnar, G. H., & Hopwood, W. S. (2006). Sistem informasi akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  6. Buana, I., & Wirawati, N. G. P. (2018). Pengaruh kualitas sistem informasi, kualitas informasi, dan perceived usefulness pada kepuasan pengguna sistem informasi akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 22(1), 683–713. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2018.v22.i01.p26
  7. Chiu, C., Chang, C., Cheng, H., & Fang, Y. (2009). Determinants of customer repurchase intention in online shopping. Online Information Review.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ese of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621
  9. Delone, W., & Mclean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems Success : A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  10. Dimoka, A., & Davis, F. D. (2008). Where does TAM reside in the brain? The neural mechanisms underlying technology adoption. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 169. http://aiset.aisnet.org/icis2008
  11. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1998). Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information & Management, 33(4), 171–185.DOI:10.1016/0378-7206(98)00028-7
  12. Fishbein, M., Jaccard, J., Davidson, A. R., Ajzen, I., & Loken, B. (1980). Predicting and understanding family planning behaviors. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
  13. Guimaraes, T., Staples, & Mckeen. (2003). Empirically Testing Some main User-Related Factors for System Development Quality. Quality Management Journal, 10(4), 39–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919083
  14. Hendra, J. (2016). Aplikasi model TAM terhadap pengguna layanan internet banking di kantor Bank Jatim cabang Situbondo. Jurnal Ilmiah Ecobuss, 4(1), 40–48.
  15. Hess, T. J., Joshi, K., & McNab, A. L. (2010). An alternative lens for understanding technology acceptance: An equity comparison perspective. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 20(2), 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919391003712447
  16. Hess, T. J., McNab, A. L., & Basoglu, K. A. (2014). Reliability generalization of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intentions. Mis Quarterly, 38(1), 1–28. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.01
  17. Isnaeningsih, H. N., Fitriati, A., Pujiharto, P., & Astuti, H. J. (2021). The influence Quality of information, Sistem Quality and Service Quality on Satisfaction and User Performace. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 12(2), Layouting. https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.v12i2.11185
  18. Jayani, D. H. (2021). 96,92% Tenaga Kerja Berasal dari UMKM. Databoks.Katadata.Co.Id.
  19. Jogiyanto, H. M. (2007). Sistem informasi keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  20. Kulkarni, U. R., Ravindran, S., & Freeze, R. (2006). A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 309–347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230311
  21. Laumer S, Christian Maier & Tim Weitzel (2017) Information quality, user satisfaction, and the manifestation of workarounds: a qualitative and quantitative study of enterprise content management system users, European Journal of Information Systems, 26:4, 333-360, DOI: 10.1057/s41303-016-0029-7
  22. Lee, J., & Kim, S. (1992). The relationship between procedural formalization in MIS development and MIS success: A contingent analysis. Information & Management, 22(2), 89–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(92)90064-M
  23. Liu, Z., & Lai, M. (2014). Price Comparison, Product Differentiation and Tacit Collusion in B2C Market. Review of Industrial Economics.
  24. Livary, J. (2005). An Empirical Test of DeLoneand McLean Model of Information SystemSuccess: Database for Advance in InformationSystem (DFA. Proquest Company.
  25. Maas, A. L., Hannun, A. Y., & Ng, A. Y. (2013). Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. Proc. Icml, 30(1), 3.
  26. Mc Leod, R. (2010). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  27. Mc Leod, R., & Schell, G. P. (2013). Management Information System. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  28. Melone, N. (1990). A Theoritical Assessment of The User Satisfaction Construct in Information System Research. Management Science, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.1.76
  29. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823
  30. Nugraheni S, I. (2016). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Paket Program Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Empiris pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat di Kota Boyolali). Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. DOI: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/43245
  31. Ogunsade & Obembe, D. (2016) The influence of informal institutions on informal sector entrepreneurship: a study of Nigeria's hand-woven textile industry, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 28:6, 413-429, DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2016.1202093
  32. Ong, C.-S., Day, M.-Y., & Hsu, W.-L. (2009). The measurement of user satisfaction with question answering systems. Information & Management, 46(7), 397–403. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2009.07.004
  33. Purwati, A. A., Mustafa, Z., & Deli, M. M. (2021). Management Information System in Evaluation of BCA Mobile Banking Using DeLone and McLean Model. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 2(2), 70–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v2i2.217
  34. Rukmiyati, N. M. S., & Budiartha, I. K. (2016). Pengaruh kualitas sistem informasi, kualitas informasi dan perceived usefulness pada kepuasan pengguna akhir software akuntansi (studi empiris pada hotel berbintang di provinsi bali). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 5(1), 115–142. http://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view
  35. Simon Nisja Putra Zai, A. F. D. (2014). Pengaruh Pentingnya Sistem, Kualitas Sistem& Kualitas Informasi Terhadap Kegunaan& Kepuasan Pengguna Dalam Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Studi Kasus di RSUP Dr.Soeradji Tirtonegoro Klaten). Yogyakarta, Unversitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1992.
  36. Stefanovic, I., Prokic, S., & Rankovic, L. (2010). Motivational and success factors of entrepreneurs: the evidence from a developing country. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci: ?asopis Za Ekonomsku Teoriju i Praksu, 28(2), 251–269.
  37. Supriatna, D., & Jin, T. F. (2006). Analisis pengaruh kepuasan pengguna public computer terhadap efisiensi dan efektifitas mahasiswa Trisakti School of Management. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 8(2), 111–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34208/jba.v8i2.154
  38. Tahu, G. P., & Yuesti, A. (2021). Academic Information System In Higher Education: Applicating Delone and Mclean Model. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 2844–2853.
  39. Teo, T. S. H., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. I. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99–132. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250303
  40. Tulodo, B. A. R., & Solichin, A. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi dan Perceived Usefulness terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Care dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja Karyawan. JRMSI-Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia, 10(1), 25–43.
  41. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2). DOI:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  42. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  43. Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & O’Neal, Q. (1995). Exploring the factors associated with expert systems success. MIS Quarterly, 83–106. DOI: 10.2307/249712
  44. Yuliani, A. (2017). Kemenkop UKM: 3,79 Juta UMKM Sudah Go Online. Www.Kominfo.Go.Id.