Main Article Content

Abstract

  • This study aimed to examine the effect of audit opinion, audit fee, and KAP size on auditor switching with companies size as moderating variable. The population in this study were 86 financial companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The purposive sampling technique produced 47 companies as the sample. This study used secondary data with the documentation method and analyzed using logistic regression as well as absolute difference test value to test the moderating variable. The results of this study showed that audit opinion has negative significant effect on auditor switching, KAP size has positive significant effect on auditor switching, and audit fee has not effect on auditor switching. Company size is not able to moderate the influence of audit opinion, audit fee, and KAP size on auditor switching. The conclusion of this study is the companies that conduct auditor switching are influenced by the opinions received and the KAP size. Audit fee does not affect the company's decision to conduct auditor switching and the size of the company is not a determinant of the auditor switching.
Keywords: Audit Opinion; KAP Size; Auditor Switching

Keywords

Akuntansi

Article Details

How to Cite
Kholipah, S., & Suryandari, D. (2019). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI AUDITOR SWITCHING PADA PERUSAHAAN KEUANGAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI PERIODE 2015-2017. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.2.83-96

References

  1. Aminah, et al. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Switching pada Perusahaan yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010 - 2015. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan, 8, 36-50.
  2. Arens & Loebbecke J. K. 2003. Auditing; Pendekatan Terpadu Buku 1 dan 2 Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  3. Arinta, K. D., & Adiwibowo, S. (2013). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mendorong Pergantian Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Studi Pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia Tahun 2007 - 2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2, 1–11.
  4. Chadegani, A. A., Mohamed, Z. M., & Jari, A. (2011). The Determinant Factors of Auditor Switch among Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 10(80), 2001–2006. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7524
  5. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit fees. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(May), 183–199.
  6. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  7. Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices. A study of the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7
  8. Hartono, T. A., & Rohman, A. (2015). Analisis Hubungan Auditor-Klien: Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Switching Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4(4), 1–12. Retrieved from http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
  9. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 1215–1224. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=12243301&site=ehost-live
  10. Khasanah, I., & Nahumury, J. (2015). The factors affecting auditor switching in manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). The Indonesian Accounting Review, 3(02), 203. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v3i02.206
  11. Mawariyani Putri, S., Rofika, & Deswiyawati. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perusahaan melakukan auditor switching (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Ekonomi, 2, 1–14.
  12. Mohamed, D. M., & Habib, M. H. (2013). Auditor independence, audit quality and the mandatory auditor rotation in Egypt. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 6(2), 116–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBS-07-2012-0035
  13. Nazri, S. N. F. S. M., Smith, M., & Ismail, Z. (2012). Factors influencing auditor change: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 20(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341211263274
  14. Niranjan Banik, Adam Koesoemadinata, Charles Wagner, Charles Inyang, H. B. (2013). No Title ???????????? ??????????? ?????? (?????? ???????????). https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0137.1
  15. Sari, I. W. I., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. . (2016). Reputasi Auditor Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Audit Fee Pada Auditor Swtitching. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 16(1), 527–556.
  16. Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling Author ( s ): Michael Spence Source : The Quarterly Journal of Economics , Vol . 87 , No . 3 ( Aug ., 1973 ), pp . 355-374 Published by : The MIT Press Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/1882010. Press, The M I T Journal, The Quarterly, 87(3), 355–374.
  17. Stephanie, J. (2017). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Auditor Switching. Journal of Accounting, 6(3), 1–12.
  18. Sulistiarini, E., & Sudarno. (2012). . Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 1(2), 1–12.
  19. Udayani, N. K. S., & Badera, I. D. N. (2017). Kualitas Audit Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Pergantian Manajemen dan Audit Fee pada Auditor Switching. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 20, 1820–1847.
  20. Wea, A. N. S., & Murdiawati, D. (2015) Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audiitor Switching Secara Voluntary pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Bisnis dan ekonomi (JBE), 22(2), 154–170.