Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 14, 2019
Accepted
July 19, 2019
Published
August 21, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 432 Download : 487

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstrak

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbandingan Good Corporate Governance ( Badan Amil Zakat nasional)  dan Laznas(Lembaga Amil Zakat Nasiona. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak delapan belas(18) Baznas dan Laznas di Jawa Timur. Jenis dan sumber data diperoleh dari laporan tahunan badan atau lembaga amil zakat nasional di Jawa Timur tahun 2016-2017 yang diterbitkan di website resmi pid.baznas.go.id. Data dianalisis dengan beberapa tahap, yaitu melakukan content analysis dan  dilakukan uji hipotesis dengan Mann Whitney U Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan  uji Mann Whitney U Test sebesar 0.003,  dengan demikian terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap penerapan GCG Baznas dengan Laznas. Baznas lebih baik dalam menerapkan good corporate governance dibandingkan pada Laznas.

Kata Kunci: Baznas, Laznas, Good Corporate Governance.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the good corporate governance of the Baznas(Amil Zakat Agency) and Laznas(the National Amil Zakat Institution). The samples used in this study were 18 Amil Zakat Bodies and Amil Zakat Institutions. The types and sources of data are obtained from the annual report of the national amil zakat agency or institution in East Java for 2016-2017 which is published  on the official website of pid.baznas.go.id. The analysis technique in this study was to conduct content analysis, then carried out hypothesis testing with the Mann Whitney U Test. The Mann Whitney U Test results of 0.003 , which means there are significant differences. Based on the results of the study, the authors can conclude that there are differences in the application of good corporate governance at the Baznas with Laznas. The Baznas is better at implementing good corporate governance than at the Laznas.

Keywords: Baznas, Laznas, Good Corporate Governance.

Article Details

License

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Latifah, S. W., Aprilia, S., & Syam, D. (2019). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE BAZNAS DAN LAZNAS. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.2.97-110
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anwar, Hidayat. 2012. “Model Tatakelola Badan Dan Lembaga Amil Zakat Sebagai Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat (Studi Pada Badan/Lembaga Amil Zakat Di Kota Malang)”. Jurnal Humanity, Vol. 7, No. 2, hlm 01 – 13.
  2. BUMN, K. N. 2011. Per-01/MBU/2011 tentang Penerapan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik (Good Corporate Governance) Pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara.
  3. Deegan. 2002. "Introduction: The Legitimizing Effect Of Social And Environmental Disclosure – A Theoretical Foundation". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15, No. 3, hlm: 282–311.
  4. Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1, hlm: 57-74.
  5. Eri, S. 2008. Manajemen Zakat Ciputat, Jakarta: Institut Manajemen Zakat (IMZ).
  6. Forum for Corporate Governance in Indonesia (FCGI).
  7. Ghozali, I. 2006. Statistik non-parametrik: Teori dan aplikasi dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  8. Hery. 2010. Potret Profesi Audit Internal. Bandung.
  9. Husein, Fakhri. 2002. Menata Ulang Sistem Zakat. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Press. hlm: 52.
  10. Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  11. Jansen, M., dan William Meckling. 1976. A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims and Organizational Forms. Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3, No. 4.
  12. Kiryanto, dan V. N. Khasanah. 2013. "Analisis Karakteristik Muzakki Dan Tata Kelola Laz Terhadap Motivasi Membayar Zakat Penghasilan". Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 2, No. 1, hlm.
  13. Komite Nasional Kebijakan Corporate Governance (KNKCG).
  14. Nasution, Mustafa Edwin. 2009. Current issue lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  15. Ross, Stephen. 1973. The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem. American Economic Review. Vol. 63, No. 2, hlm: 134-139.
  16. Setia, Hamid. 2018. Kajian Bisnis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha. Vol. 26, No. 21.
  17. Sjahputra, I., dan A. W. Tunggal. 2010. Internal Audit and Corporate Governance: Harvarindo.
  18. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Syakhroza, A. 2003. "Theory of Good Corporate Governance". Vol., No. 8, hlm: 9-25.
  20. Tan, H.P., D. Plowman, P.Hancock. 2003. Intellectual Capital and Financial Retuns of Companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital. Vol.8, No.1, hlm: 76-95.
  21. Ulum, I., dan A. Juanda. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Akuntansi. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.
  22. Ulya, Z. 2015. "Pengelolaan Zakat Sebagai Bentuk Penegakan Ham Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Rakyat". AL-‘ADALAH, Vol. 12, No. 3, hlm.
  23. Undang Undang 1945 Pasal 33. Pengertian Perekonomian, Pemanfaatan SDA, dan Prinsip Perekonomian Nasional.
  24. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2011. Pengelolaan Zakat.
  25. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 1999. Pengelolaan Zakat.
  26. Warsono, S.. F. Amalia, and D. K. Rahajeng, 2009. Corporate Governance Concept and Model: Preserving True Organization Welfare. Yogyakarta: Center for Good Corporate Governance Universitas Gadjah Mada.