Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 17, 2019
Accepted
June 17, 2019
Published
June 17, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 208 Download : 670

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the effect of (1) the perceived ease of use, (2) the perceived usefulness, (3) the attitude towards using, and (4) the intention to use in using the E-commerce on the SMEs in Bengkulu city. The characteristics of the SMEs that were used in this study are the SMEs that are listed on the Department of Cooperatives and SMEs in Bengkulu city in the marketing field, that have not using the E-commerce for business activities yet, but already familiar with E-commerce in private, and already completed the training related to electronic commerce, SMEs recording and accounting. The populations in this study were the SMEs registered in the Department of Cooperatives and SMEs in Bengkulu City in the marketing field. Based on the Purposive Sampling Method, the samples obtained were 87 SMEs. The data is analyzed using SmartPLS 2.0 M3. The analysis shows that the perceived ease of use positively affects perceived usefulness, ease of use perceived positively effects the attitudes towards using, the perceived usefulness positively effects the attitudes towards using, the perceived usefulness positively effects the intention to use, and attitudes towards using positively influences the intention to use in using e-commerce in SMEs in Bengkulu city.


Key words: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude towards using, intention to use

Article Details

License

Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal

Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Akuntansi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

How to Cite
Marsyadini, F., & Aprila, N. (2019). Niat Menggunakan E-commerce: Suatu Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Models (Studi Pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Di Kota Bengkulu). Jurnal Akuntansi, 8(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.8.1.55-66
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aaker, David, A dan Myers, John, G. 1997. Advertising Management. New Jersey: Prentce Hall inc.
  2. Abdillah, Willy dan Jogiyanto. 2015. Partial Least Square (PLS) – Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset.
  3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. 1999.”Are Individual Differences Germane To The Acceptance Of New Information Technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol.30 No.2,pp.361-91
  4. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, 129-385, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
  5. Ajzen. I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviourand Human Decision Process. Amherst, MA: Elsevier.
  6. Ajzen, Icek. 1988. from intentions to actions: attitudes, personality, & behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
  7. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  8. Bagozzi, R. P. 1981. “Attitudes, Intention and Beavior; A test of some key hypothesis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychological, 41, 607 – 626
  9. Barret, G.V., Thornton, C. L., & Cabe, P.A. 1968, Human Factors Evaluation of A Computer Bassed Information System and Retrieval System. Human Factors, 10, 431-436
  10. Bodnar, George H, and William S. Hopwood. 2006. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Buku I. Jakarta: Penerbit salemba empat.
  11. Chau, P. Y. K. 1996. An Emperical Investigation on Factors Affecting The Acceptance of CASE by Systems Developers. Information & Management, 30, 269-280.
  12. Chin, W. W. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.). Modern Methods for Business Research (295-336). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.
  13. Cooper, Donald R. & Schindler, Pamela S. 2012. Business Research Methods, 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  15. Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi & PR. Washaw. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoritical Models, International Journal Management Machine Studies, August, 35(8), 982-1003.
  16. Ferdinand, Augusty. 2006. Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro,
  17. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 18 (1), 39-50.
  18. Ghozali, Imam. 2014.Structural Equation Modeling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Edisi 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  19. Hall, James A. 2007. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Edisi Ketiga Terjemahan Amir Abadi Yusuf. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  20. Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. & Davis, G.B. 1997. Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, (11), 87-114.
  21. Indriantoro dan Supomo, 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Edisi Pertama, BPFE-Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.
  22. Intan, Raden Ajeng dan Warsono, Sony. 2014. Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Internal Dan Eksternal Terhadap Penggunaan E-Commerce Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM). Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Jurusan Ilmu Akuntansi/Akuntansi Terapan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
  23. Jogiyanto, H. M. 2007. Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  24. Jogiyanto. H. M. 2005. Analisis dan Desain Sistem Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi
  25. Lesmono, Ibnu Dwi. 2015. Pengaruh Penggunaan E-Commerce Bagi Pengembangan Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Evolusi, 3 (1), 49-60.
  26. Lestari, Yuni Puji, Setyowati, Nuning, dan Ihsaniyati, Hanifah. 2014. Dampak Pengaruh Sosial dan Kondisi Fasilitas Terhadap Niat Adopsi Media Sosial oleh UMKM Rotan di Kecamatan Gatak Kabupaten Sukoharjo. E-Journal AGRISTA. 3 (2), 1-14.
  27. Malhotra, N. K. and Birks, D.F. 2007. Marketing Research: An Apllied Approach. 3rd European Edition. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
  28. Maskur, Abdullah. 2005 .Lilitan Masalah Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Menegah (UMKM) &. Kontroversi Kebijakan. Medan: Bitra Indonesia.
  29. Mulyadi, 2001. Sistem Akuntansi. Edisi Ketiga. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  30. Nicolaou, A. I. 2000. A contingency model of perceived effectiveness in accounting information systems: Organizational coordination and control. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 1, 2, pp. 91-105.
  31. Purbo, O. W. & Wahyudi, A. A. 2001. Mengenal E-Commerce. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  32. Poetri, Adellia Rosarindry. 2010. Adopsi E-Commerce Dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Bagi UKM. Skripsi. Ekonomi, Manajemen, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
  33. Putri, Ni Made Kania I, dan Suprapti, Ni Wayan Sri. 2016. Aplikasi Model TAM dalam Menjelaskan NiatMenggunakan Mobile Commerce di Kota Denpasar. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 5 (4), 2341-2368.
  34. Sarwono, Jonathan. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  35. Sarwono, Jonathan. 2007. Analisis Jalur Untuk Riset Bisnis: Aplikasi Riset Pemasaran, Keuangan, MSDM dan Kewirausahaan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  36. Schultz dan Slevin. 1975. “Implementation and Organizational Validity: An empirical Investigation”, Implementating OperationResearch Management Science. New York.
  37. Sekaran, Uma. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis Buku 1 dan 2 Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  38. Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Cetakan Ke-20. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  39. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  40. Sujarweni, V. Wiratna. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
  41. Supriono. 2015. Pengaruh Sikap, Norma Subyektif, Persepsi Penggunaan dan Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan Terhadap Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi dengan Minat Penggunaan sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Teknik Informatika, 3 (2), 1-15.
  42. Taylor, S. and P.A. Todd. 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models." Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 144-176.
  43. Triandis, H. C. 1977. Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
  44. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 Tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah.
  45. Utami, Sri Setyaningsih. 2010. Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi Dalam Perkembangan Bisnis. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Teknologi Informasi, 8 (1), 61-67.
  46. Yuliana, Oviliani Y. 2000. Penggunaan Teknologi Internet dalam Bisnis. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol. 2, No. 1, Mei 2000: 36-52.