ANALISIS KOMUNIKASI RISIKO PETANI BAWANG MERAH

Raesa Harlina, Sri Fatimah, Iwan Setiawan

Abstract


Onion is the third largest horticultural commodity with the production and land area in Indonesia. The growth of onion demand has an increase up to 1.73% annually. This motivates farmers to develop their onion farms. On the other hand, onion is a risky farm that comes from various factors. Farm risk perceptions need to be developed through risk communication. Without risk communication, farmers' awareness of possible risks is low and farming is increasingly at risk. This research uses descriptive method and sociometry to know perception and risk communication of Rindu Alam Farmer Group. There is a wide diversity of farmers' perceptions towards risk. Risk communication is done directly. The type of social network in this group is the whole network. The density of the network is 0.369 with medium strength, number of bond 114. The actor who has the highest degree of closeness, betweenness and centrality is the manager of the group. This group network system forms 12 clicks with a minimum of 3 members. Leaders in this group are joined in more than one clique. The most frequently communicated risk factors that are considered important.

Keywords: social network analysis (SNA), risk communication, risk perception, clique, betweenness, closeness, density, the centrality


Keywords


social network analysis (SNA), risk communication, risk perception, clique, betweenness, closeness, density, the centrality

Full Text:

PDF PCX

References


Backus, et al. 1995. Farm Decision Making Under Risk And Uncertainty. Netherland: Netherlands Journal Of Agricultural Science 45: page 307 -328

Brass, D.J. et. al. 2004. Taking Stock of Network and organization. A Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Journal vol.47 no.6 page 795-817

Bungin, Burhan. 2008. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Miller, Buys. Evonne dan K.V.Megen . 2012. Conceptuating Climate Change in rural Australia : Community perception and (i) action. Regional environmental change vol 12. Hal. 237-248

Cross, Rob and Stephen P Borgatti. 2000. The Ties That Shares: Relational Characteristic That Fasilitate Information Seeking. Vancouver Sunbelt Social Network. Hal. 1-35

Departemen Pertanian. 2007 Profil

Frewer, Lynn. 2016.The Publik and Effective Risk Communication. University of Wageningen. Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.049

Kementrian Pertanian. 2011. Petunjuk Pelaksanaan penilaian kemampuan Kelompok tani. Pusat Penyuluhan Pertanian Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan SDM Pertanian. Peraturan Kepala

Badan Penyuluhan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian Nomor : 168/Per/Sm.170/J/11/11

Lang, S., Fewtrell. L & Bartram. J. 2001. WHO (World Health Organization): Water Quality : Guideliness, Standarts, and Health. Edited. Fewtrell & Bartram. IWA: London. ISBN 1900222280 317-332

Manyamsari, Ira. dan Mujiburrahmad. 2014. Karakteristik Petani Dan Hubungannya Dengan Kompetensi Petani Lahan Sempit (Kasus : Di Desa Sinar Sari Kecamatan Dramaga Kab. Bogor Jawa Barat). Bogor : Agrisep Vol (15) No. 2 , 2014 59-74

Narayan, Sudha. 2012. Safe Gambles? Farmer Perceptions Of Transactional Certainty And Risk Return Trade Offs In Contract Farming Schemes In Southern India. Mumbai : Indira Gandhi Institute Of Development Research WP-2012-021 page 1 – 54

Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor : 47/Permentan/Ot.140/10/2006 Tentang Pedoman Umum Budidaya Pertanian Pada Lahan Pegunungan

Reynolds, Barbara And Mathew, W Seeger. 2005. Crisis And Emergency Risk Communication As An Integrative Model. Francis : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. ISSN: 1081-0730 print/1087-0415 (43-55)

Rodjak, Abdul. 2006. Manajemen Usahatani. Jilid Ii. Bandung :Pustaka Gratuna.

Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization and crisis. dalam M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 21. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Setiawan, Iwan. 2008 . Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi Petani pada Berbagai Zona Agroekosistem di Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Agrikutura: Vol 19 no 1. ISSN 0853-2885

Snow, E.C. 2010. Increasing Communication Effectiveness And Efficiency Between The Department Of Agriculture And The Cypriot Farmers They Serve :A Dissertation In Agricultural And Extension Education. The Pennsylvania State University. Volume 18, Number 1 DOI: 10.5191/jiaee.2011.18106 (hal 73-86)

Soedjana, Tjeppy D. 2007. Sistem Usaha Tani Terintegrasi Tanaman-Ternak Sebagai Respons Petani Terhadap Faktor Risiko. Bogor: Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Peternakan (hal 82 – 87)

Sumarni, Nani Dan Hidayat. Achmad. 2005. Budidaya Bawang Merah. Bandung: Balai Penelitiantanaman Sayuran Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Hortikultura Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian

Tubbs, S.L. & Moss, S. 2005. Human Communication _ Prinsip – Prinsip Dasar. Terj. Mulyana, Deddy. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosda Karya

Wood, J.T. 2009. Communication In Our Lives : Fifth Edition. Boston.: WADSWORTH Cengage Learning.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.17.2.197-206

URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0001jagrisep.17.2.197-2069

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times PCX - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Raesa Harlina, Sri Fatimah, Iwan Setiawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

AGRISEP indexing by :

Find in a library with WorldCatHasil gambar untuk index copernicus


Crossref Sponsored Member Badge


Locations:

<