Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 9, 2015
Accepted
September 9, 2015
Published
April 10, 2011
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 875 Download : 3315

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

There was changing in dependency of the economic plantations system in along time. Two phenomena which always occur is the smallholding estate system are poverty and underdevelopment. In the colonial period, though plantation integrated to the external world, but farmer plantation never change from dependency situation which was created by colonial government. At present, when globalization become ideology that condition has not change. In the makro context, dependency in plantation on colonial period was showed by authority for source of economic. At present, dependency have influence in political government. All of government programs have implication in stagnancy of dependency nature.

Keywords

dependency plantation poverty and underdevelopment

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Purwandari, H. (2011). SISTEM EKONOMI PERKEBUNAN: PERSISTENSI KETERGANTUNGAN NEGARA DUNIA KETIGA. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 10(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.10.1.63-79
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Atmosudirdjo, Prajudi. 1983. Sejarah Ekonomi Indonesia: dari Segi Sosiologi Sampai Akhir Abad XIX. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta
  2. Arief, Sritua dan Adi Sasono. 1984. Ketergantungan dan Keterbelakangan: Sebuah Studi Kasus. Penerbit Sinar Harapan. Jakarta
  3. Bachriadi, Dianto. 1995. Ketergantungan Petani dan Penetrasi Kapital. Akatiga. Bandung
  4. Beckford, G.L. 1972. Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third Worl. Oxford University Press.
  5. London Cardoso, Fernando. 1982. “Dependency and Development in Latin America” Pp 112- 127 in Hamza Alavi & Teodor Shanin (Eds). Introduction to the Sociology of Developing Societies. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  6. Frank, Andre Gunder. 1984. Sosiologi Pembangunan dan Keterbelakangan Sosiologi. Pustaka Pulsar. Jakarta Frank, Andre
  7. Gunder. 1969. “The Development of Underdevelopment” in Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Express
  8. Galtung, Johan. 1980. “A Structural Theory of Imperialisme” Pp 261-298 in Ingolf and Anthony R. De Souza (Eds) Dialectics of Third World Development. New York: Montelair
  9. Kartodirdjo, Sartono dan Djoko Suryo. 1991. Sejarah Perkebunan di Indonesia: Kajian Sosial Ekonomi. Aditya Media. Yogyakarta
  10. Kristanto, Heri. 2003. Menimbang Sejarah Dalam Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal ekonomi Rakyat. Th. I - No. 11 - Januari 2003
  11. O?Brien, Philip J. 1975. A Critique of Latin American Theories of Dependency. In I.Oxaal, T. Barentt & Booth (Eds) Beyond the Sociology of Development. London:
  12. O?Malley, William. 1988. Perkebunan 1830-1940: Ikhtisar dalam Sejarah Ekonomi Indonesia. Booth, Anne., et al. (Peny). LP3ES. Jakarta
  13. Pakpahan, Agus. 2002a. Membangun Perkebunan Abad 21: Membalik Arus dan Gelombang Sejarah (sebuah konsep Strategi Pembangunan Perkebunan yang Partisipatif, Produktif, Efisien, Berkeadilan, dan Berkelanjutan) dalam Membalik Arus dan Gelombang Sejarah Perkebunan Indonesia. 2002.
  14. Kumpulan Makalah. Edisi I Pakpahan, Agus. 2000b. Globalisasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Alam (Perkebunan): apakah MNC Sebagai Ancaman atau Peluang? dalam Membalik Arus dan Gelombang Sejarah Perkebunan Indonesia. 2002. Kumpulan Makalah. Edisi I
  15. Pakpahan, Agus. 2000c. Globalisasi dan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Alam (Perkebunan): Internalisasi Otonomi Daerah untuk Kemajuan Agribisnis Perkebunan dalam Membalik Arus dan Gelombang Sejarah Perkebunan Indonesia. 2002. Kumpulan Makalah. Edisi I
  16. Pakpahan, Agus. 2000d. Peranan HGU dalam Pengembangan Perkebunan Besar dalam Pola Penguasaan dan Pola Usaha serta Pemberdayaan BPN dan Pemda dalam Rangka Partisipasi Rakyat di Sektor Perkebunan.
  17. Soetarto, E, et al. (peny). Prosiding Lokakarya. Pusat Kajian Agraria. Bogor
  18. Pakpahan, Agus. 1999. Kebijaksanaan dan Langkah-langkah Pengembangan Kemitraan Bidang Perkebunan dalam Membalik Arus dan Gelombang Sejarah Perkebunan Indonesia. 2002. Kumpulan Makalah. Edisi I Roxborough, Ian. 1986. Teori-teori Keterbelakangan. LP3ES. Jakarta
  19. Suwarsono dan Alvin Y. So. 1991. Perubahan Sosial dan Pembangunan di Indonesia. LP3ES. Jakarta